Hydraulic systems disposal

PCBs are discharged into the environment by leaking from hydraulic systems, diffusion from coatings and during production, waste incineration or waste disposal. Atmospheric PCBs are predominately presented in the gas phase. However, significant fractions of the more chlorinated congeners are also presented in the particulate phase [26]. 

Disposal is not normally a heavy expense for hydraulic systems and monitoring devices. There are some instruments that are radioactive, with thin layer activation, but not a serious level. 

Another auxiliaiy unloading system that has proven to be very effective and efficient involves the use of moveable, hydraulically operated truck dumps located at the disposal site. Operationally, the trailer is backed up onto one of the tipping ramps, with or without its tractor. The back of the trailer is opened, and the unit is then tilted upward until the wastes fall out by gravity. The time required for the entire unloading operation typically is about 5 min per trip. 

After the type of system has been selected, many of these same factors must be considered in selecting the fluid for the system. This chapter is devoted to hydraulic fluids. Included in it are sections on the properties and characteristics desired of hydraulic fluids types of hydraulic fluids hazards and safety precautions for working with, handling, and disposing of hydraulic liquids types and control of contamination and sampling. 

Alternative final cover systems, such as the innovative evapotranspiration (ET) cover systems, are increasingly being considered for use at waste disposal sites, including municipal solid waste (MSW) and hazardous waste landfills when equivalent performance to conventional final cover systems can be demonstrated. Unlike conventional cover system designs that use materials with low hydraulic permeability (barrier layers) to minimize the downward migration of water from the cover to the waste (percolation), ET cover systems use water balance components to minimize percolation. These cover systems rely on the properties of soil to store water until it is either transpired through vegetation or evaporated from the soil surface. 

Another important implication is that highly permeable soil liners generally have defects, such as cracks, macropores, voids, and zones, that have not been compacted properly. One opportunity to eliminate those defects is at the time of construction. Another opportunity arises after the landfill is in operation, and the weight of overlying solid waste or of a cover over the whole system further compresses the soil. This compression, however, occurs only on the bottom liners, as there is not much overburden stress on a final cover placed over a solid waste disposal unit. This is one reason why it is more difficult to design and implement a final cover with low hydraulic conductivity than it is for a bottom liner. Not only is there lower stress acting on a cover than on a liner, but also the cover is subjected to many environmental forces, whereas the liner is not. 

The bathtub effect occurs, in part, because most wastes have much higher hydraulic conductivities than the natural material into which they are placed they may also have very different unsaturated soil—moisture characteristics. The hydraulic conductivity of some wastes can be reduced by compaction. The bathtub effect also occurs because more infiltration enters the disposal excavation than would under normal undisturbed conditions. Trench covers may be constructed to achieve the desired hydraulic conductivity and to limit infiltration for the required period of containment or until compaction of the wastes occurs however, it is difficult to maintain the trench covers. The covers must withstand attack by plants, weather (freeze—thaw, wet—dry), erosion, and strains caused by consolidation within the trench. Most trench covers are not capable of meeting these demanding requirements without costly long-term maintenance programs. The cover should be designed to allow for expected consolidation and to utilize hydro-geological concepts of saturated and unsaturated flow systems present at the site. 

Abstract Geological disposal of nuclear fuel wastes relies on the concept of multiple barrier systems. In order to predict the performance of these barriers, mathematical models have been developed, verified and validated against analytical solutions, laboratory tests and field experiments within the international DECOVALEX project. These models in general consider the full coupling of thermal (T), hydrological (H) and mechanical (M) processes that would prevail in the geological media around the repository. This paper shows the process of building confidence in the mathematical models by calibration with a reference T-H-M experiment with realistic rock mass conditions and bentonite properties and measured outputs of thermal, hydraulic and mechanical variables. 

Geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) in Japan is based on a multibarrier system composed of engineered and natural barriers. The engineered barriers are composed of vitrified waste encapsulated in a canister, metal overpack and buffer material. Highly compacted bentonite is considered as the candidate buffer material, mainly because of its low hydraulic conductivity and high sorption capacity of radionuclides. 

---