Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydraulic gradient concentration, measurement

Based on the above mentioned, the programme of theoretical and experimental investigation of the main parameters of coal-methanol (or its water solution) mixture pipeline transport should be opened. As the first step of the programme the comparison of power consumption (dependency of hydraulic gradient I on slurry flow velocity V and solid concentration Cs) for the pipeline transport of coal-water mixture and coal-methanol solution mixture was realised. The special laboratory measurements were made to define unknown input data of semi-empirical relationships, i.e. the limit volumetric concentration Cm and the coefficient of mechanical friction of coal in the water or water-methanol solution ka. The resultant comparison of the hydraulic gradient I of the coal-water and coal-methanol solution mixture flow is presented in Figure 2, where density of coal was pc = 1480 kg/m3, diameter of the pipe was D = 0.103 mm, the maximal grain size of coal dmax was less than 0.25 mm, volumetric concentration - C = 20 %. [Pg.376]

Figure 10.6 Profile a Distribution of velocities (values taken from measured and interpolated gradients of groundwater table and measured and interpolated hydraulic conductivities, kf) with identical scales in x- and y-direction. All values of thickness and length of profile in meter. Profile b The same profile, but with different scale of y-direction. Profile c Modelled distribution of DOC concentrations in groundwater after 250 years (again with different scale in y-direc-tion). Profile d Modelled distribution of Fe concentrations in groundwater after 250 years, (i.e. today), again with different scale in y-direction. Figure 10.6 Profile a Distribution of velocities (values taken from measured and interpolated gradients of groundwater table and measured and interpolated hydraulic conductivities, kf) with identical scales in x- and y-direction. All values of thickness and length of profile in meter. Profile b The same profile, but with different scale of y-direction. Profile c Modelled distribution of DOC concentrations in groundwater after 250 years (again with different scale in y-direc-tion). Profile d Modelled distribution of Fe concentrations in groundwater after 250 years, (i.e. today), again with different scale in y-direction.
In this Section, it is implicitly assumed that the mass transport resistance at the fluid-membrane interface on either side of the membrane is negligible. Also the following is information that is made available publicly by the membrane manufacturers, when not otherwise noted. As in technical processes, mass transport across semipermeable medical membranes is conveniently related to the concentration and pressme driving forces according to irreversible thermodynamics. Hence, for a two-component mixture the solute and solvent capacity to permeate a semipermeable membrane under an applied pressure and concentration gradient across the membrane can be expressed in terms of the following three parameters Lp, hydraulic permeability Pm, diffusive permeability and a, Staverman reflection coefficient (Kedem and Katchalski, 1958). All of them are more accurately measured experimentally because a limited knowledge of membrane stmcture means that theoretical models provide rather inaccurate predictions. [Pg.496]


See other pages where Hydraulic gradient concentration, measurement is mentioned: [Pg.1035]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.1606]    [Pg.1606]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.1129]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.2724]    [Pg.2740]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.1276]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.199 ]




SEARCH



Concentration gradient

Concentration measurements

Concentration, measures

Gradient measurements

Hydraulic gradient

Hydraulic measures

Measuring concentrations

© 2024 chempedia.info