Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Humic acid distributions

H NMR 38,39,42, 50-55 Hole capacity constant 205 Homogeneous distribution of correlation times 37 Humic acids 17 Humidity of plastics 119 Humins 17 Hydrogen bond 200 Hydrophilic 191, 194, 206... [Pg.220]

Latch DE, K McNeill (2006) Microheterogeneity of singlet oxygen distributions in irradiated humic acid solutions. Science 311 1743-1747. [Pg.44]

Evidence for the association of U with humic acids has been documented elsewhere. Dearlove et al. (1991) showed that U concentrated by ultrafiltration techniques from organic-rich groundwater samples were associated with humic colloids. Humic and fulvic acids have been shown to strongly complex U. Lienert et al. (1994) modeled the distribution of U species in the Glatt River and concluded that U-humate complexes become important at pH <6.8. These results reinforce the conclusions in the estuarine studies that U humate and fulvate complexes may account for the association of U with colloids. [Pg.588]

Table 1. Structural carbon distribution (%) of the humic acids extracted from soil horizons, adopted from Xing (2001). The distribution was calculated from solid state 13C Cross-Polarization Magic-Angle-Spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectra. Chemical shift assignment for carbon functional groups alkyl 0-50 ppm O-alkyl 50-117 ppm aromatic 107-165 ppm. Table 1. Structural carbon distribution (%) of the humic acids extracted from soil horizons, adopted from Xing (2001). The distribution was calculated from solid state 13C Cross-Polarization Magic-Angle-Spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectra. Chemical shift assignment for carbon functional groups alkyl 0-50 ppm O-alkyl 50-117 ppm aromatic 107-165 ppm.
Beckett, R., Jue, Z. and Giddings, J. C. (1987). Determination of molecular weight distributions of fulvic and humic acids using flow field-flow fractionation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 21, 289-295. [Pg.521]

Klenke et al. [5] described a technique for extraction of humic and fulvic acids from stream sediments and outlined methods for their determination. By means of flame atomic absorption spectrometry, the levels of environmentally important heavy metals (cadmium, copper, chromium, cobalt, nickel and lead) in the fulvic and humic acid extracts were compared with those in the original sediment samples. The pattern distribution of the respective metals in the two cases showed very close agreement, suggesting that the combined extract of humic and fulvic acids could be used as an indicator of the level of heavy metal pollution in flowing waters. [Pg.283]

The humates present in soil are polyelectrolytes and bear some similarity to polyacrylic acid and polymethacrylic acid (49, 50). The molecular weight distribution for the humates is considerable fulvic acid fractions of 1,000 daltons have been isolated (51) while humic acid molecular weights obtained by gel chromatography are in the range 17,000 to 100,000 daltons according to the type of soil from which it was extracted (52). However, ultracentrifugation analysis indicates a molecular range of 2,000 to 1,500,000 daltons for humic acids (55). [Pg.57]

In spite of this variation in molecular weights and solubilities humic acid and fulvic acid have a very similar chemical composition. These acids consist of aromatic moieties such as phenols, benzenepolycarboxylic acids, hydroxybenzenepolycarbo-xylic acids, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene carboxylic acids, together with more complex condensed structures and polycylic compounds. It is conjectured that these various units are joined together by aliphatic chains (45, 54) the distribution of functional groups is presented in Table 5. [Pg.57]

Figure 9.19 Aldrich humic acid (AHA)-water distribution ratio (Adoc) of TBT (A) and TPT ( ) as a function of pH. Each point was determined from a sorption isotherm. Error bars are the standard deviation of the slope of the linear isotherm and of pH. The lines were calculated using the model described by Arnold et al. (1998). The insert shows the speciation of TBT and TPT as a function of pH. Adapted from Arnold et al. (1997 and 1998). Figure 9.19 Aldrich humic acid (AHA)-water distribution ratio (Adoc) of TBT (A) and TPT ( ) as a function of pH. Each point was determined from a sorption isotherm. Error bars are the standard deviation of the slope of the linear isotherm and of pH. The lines were calculated using the model described by Arnold et al. (1998). The insert shows the speciation of TBT and TPT as a function of pH. Adapted from Arnold et al. (1997 and 1998).
Leboeuf, E. J., and W. J. Weber Jr., A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 8. Sorbent organic domains Discovery of a humic acid glass transition and an argument for a polmer-based model , Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1697-1702 (1997). [Pg.1234]

That several model organic compounds were only partially or incompletely retained by the resins prompted us to investigate the use of Carbopack B as an alternative or complementary adsorbent. Test solutions without humic acids were used to verify the sorptive-desorptive behavior of several model compounds under the experimental conditions proposed by Bacaloni et al. (8), except that the compounds were desorbed with methylene chloride. The results of duplicate experiments are given in Table III. Isophorone and MIBK were not effectively retained by Carbopack B, whereas bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was almost equally distributed between the aqueous phase and the carbon. The relatively poor recovery of 1-chlorododecane, 2,4 -dichlorobiphenyl, and 2,2, 5,5 -tetrachlorobiphenyl may be ascribed to sorptive losses onto reservoir glass wall, whereas furfural may be inefficiently... [Pg.464]

HUMIC Acid. Humic acid did not contribute detectable impurities to the eluates of blank parfait columns. This result was apparently due to the insolubility of humate in the organic solvents used to elute the Teflon and ion-exchange beds and the inability of the humate to volatilize in the GC. Humic acid did, however, distribute itself throughout the parfait column, as indicated by the observation of color entering the column effluent, F7. When 16 mg of humate in 8 L of synthetic hard water was passed through a parfait column having the Teflon bed divided into three sequential 50-mL beds, 8.9 , 5.0 , and 2.9 of the total humate were found in the aqueous phases that separated upon elution of these beds, as indicated by absorbance at 200 nm. The column effluent from this experiment contained 5.1 of the humate applied. The majority of the humate applied was found as color adsorbed to PTFE, and it did not elute into methylene chloride. Conditions to elute it from PTFE were not explored. [Pg.507]

The only other effect possibly attributed solely to humic acid involved 2,4-dichlorophenol, the most broadly distributed compound tested in this study. In columns 108 and 109, the humic acid apparently decreased the ease of elution of the chlorophenols because lower overall recoveries were obtained from column 109, which included the humate, than from column 108, which was humate-free. Also, recovery was detected in F6 of column 109 but not in F6 of column 108. This result suggests that humate enhanced binding of the phenol to the column. The reproducibility of 2,4-dichlorophenol recovery among the various parfait fractions was poor, as illustrated by the results from replicate columns 117, 118, and 120. Because of the variability, the differences in... [Pg.510]

Humic acid is composed of aromatic, aliphatic and carbohydrate carbon compounds. An average humic acid s elemental composition is 55.1% C, 5.0% H, 3.5% N, 35.6% O, and 1.8% S (Rice and MacCarthy, 1991). Its molecular weight distribution is typically broad, and it is a relatively high-molecular-weight material relative to the fulvic acid isolated from the same soil or sediment. It s predominantly functionalized by carboxylic acid and phenolic groups. At least some components of humic acid are surface-active, and these components have been shown to form micelles in concentrated, alkaline aqueous solutions (Piret et al., 1960 Visser, 1964 Wershaw et al., 1969 Tschapek and Wasowski, 1976 Chen et al., 1978 Rochus and Sipos, 1978 Hayano et al., 1982 Hayase and Tsubota, 1984 Guetzloff and Rice, 1994). [Pg.115]

TABLE 4.6. Freundlich Adsorption Constants (1In and K) and Distribution Coefficients (Kd) for Adsorption of Alachlor (Generally Linear Isotherms), Imazethapyr (Nonlinear Freundlich Isotherms), and Rimsulfuron (Langmuir Isotherms) on Humic Acids (HAs) Isolated from Two Sewage Sludges (SSI and SS2), a Soil Amended with 10tha 1yr 1 of SSI for 2 Years (SOI + SSI), and a Soil Amended with 40(ha 1yr 1 of SS2 for 2 Years (S02 + SS2), with the Corresponding Unamended Soils (SOI and S02, Respectively) (from Senesi et al., 2001)... [Pg.171]

All three components showed a very similar patter in their pH-dependent mobility. These patterns were also similar to the one found in previous CE studies (Hosse and Wilkinson, 2001 Schmitt-Kopplin et al., 1998). The SRFA were comparable to the SRNOM in terms of peak shape changes at lower pH. The two humic acids showed Gaussian mobility distributions and highly symmetric peaks over all the pH range. At pH < 3, the humic acids still showed very sharp and nicely shaped signals... [Pg.510]


See other pages where Humic acid distributions is mentioned: [Pg.151]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.858]    [Pg.860]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.515]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 ]




SEARCH



Humic acid , acidity

Humic acid distribution coefficient

Humic acids

© 2024 chempedia.info