Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

HSAB hardness parameter

Recently Parr and Pearson have used the b parameter to investigate the hard and soft properties of metal ions and ligands. They have termed this the absolute hardness in comparison to the Mulliken-Jaff6 a parameter which they call absolute electronegativity. They provide strong arguments for the use of the absolute hardness parameter in treating hard-soft acid-base (HSAB) interactions. [Pg.710]

As Pearson has pointed out, "while the HSAB principle has proved useful in many ways, it has been justifiably criticized because of the lack of a precise definition of hardness and the inability to assign numbers to this property".30 The hardness parameter (13) is now defined in terms of electronegativity, as in Equation... [Pg.87]

They indicated that the softness parameter may reasonably be considered as a quantitative measure of the softness of metal ions and is consistent with the HSAB principle by Pearson (1963, 1968). Wood et al. (1987) have shown experimentally that the relative solubilities of the metals in H20-NaCl-C02 solutions from 200°C to 350°C are consistent with the HSAB principle in chloride-poor solutions, the soft ions Au" " and Ag+ prefer to combine with the soft bisulfide ligand the borderline ions Fe +, Zn +, Pb +, Sb + and Bi- + prefer water, hydroxyl, carbonate or bicarbonate ligands, and the extremely hard Mo + bonds only to the hard anions OH and. Tables 1.23 and 1.24 show the classification of metals and ligands according to the HSAB principle of Ahrland et al. (1958), Pearson (1963, 1968) (Table 1.23) and softness parameter of Yamada and Tanaka (1975) (Table 1.24). Compari.son of Table 1.22 with Tables 1.23 and 1.24 makes it evident that the metals associated with the gold-silver deposits have a relatively soft character, whereas those associated with the base-metal deposits have a relatively hard (or borderline) character. For example, metals that tend to form hard acids (Mn +, Ga +, In- +, Fe +, Sn " ", MoO +, WO " ", CO2) and borderline acids (Fe +, Zn +, Pb +, Sb +) are enriched in the base-metal deposits, whereas metals that tend to form soft acids... [Pg.180]

This chapter is intended to provide basic understanding and application of the effect of electric field on the reactivity descriptors. Section 25.2 will focus on the definitions of reactivity descriptors used to understand the chemical reactivity, along with the local hard-soft acid-base (HSAB) semiquantitative model for calculating interaction energy. In Section 25.3, we will discuss specifically the theory behind the effects of external electric field on reactivity descriptors. Some numerical results will be presented in Section 25.4. Along with that in Section 25.5, we would like to discuss the work describing the effect of other perturbation parameters. In Section 25.6, we would present our conclusions and prospects. [Pg.364]

In our original work, we used an ionic-covalent model to interpret the E and C parameters. It has been suggested that our E and C parameters are a quantitative manifestation of the hard-soft model. "Softness (or hardness") can be considered (67) as a measure of the ratio of the tendency of a spedes to undergo covalent interaction to the tendency of the species to undergo electrostatic interaction. The relative "softness or hardness is depicted in the C/E ratio. The ratios for the acids and bases can be calculated from the data in Tables 3 and 4. If the ratio C/E is comparatively large, the add or base would be classified as type B or soft. Inasmuch as the relative ratios of C/E tells the relative importance of the two effects for various donors and acceptors, we agree that the hardness or softness discussed in the HSAB model is given by this ratio. [Pg.119]

To summarize, the HSAB principle is a very good first approximation but is usually inadequate for detailed analysis of reaction mechanisms. This is not really surprising. After all, this principle is nothing else than a two parameters relationship each reactant is characterized by its acidic or basic strength and by its hardness (softness). And obviously, we cannot expect to describe the complexity of chemistry with only two parameters. On the other hand, one should not underestimate its utility. Simple Hiickel calculations are also a two parameters treatment where the initial choice of the coulombic and resonance integrals a and )3 is critical. There is no doubt however that, handled with care, these calculations may give valuable insights. The same may be said for the HSAB principle. [Pg.97]

Different surfactants are usually characterised by the solubility behaviour of their hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecule fraction in polar solvents, expressed by the HLB-value (hydrophilic-lipophilic-balance) of the surfactant. The HLB-value of a specific surfactant is often listed by the producer or can be easily calculated from listed increments [67]. If the water in a microemulsion contains electrolytes, the solubility of the surfactant in the water changes. It can be increased or decreased, depending on the kind of electrolyte [68,69]. The effect of electrolytes is explained by the HSAB principle (hard-soft-acid-base). For example, salts of hard acids and hard bases reduce the solubility of the surfactant in water. The solubility is increased by salts of soft acids and hard bases or by salts of hard acids and soft bases. Correspondingly, the solubility of the surfactant in water is increased by sodium alkyl sulfonates and decreased by sodium chloride or sodium sulfate. In the meantime, the physical interactions of the surfactant molecules and other components in microemulsions is well understood and the HSAB-principle was verified. The salts in water mainly influence the curvature of the surfactant film in a microemulsion. The curvature of the surfactant film can be expressed, analogous to the HLB-value, by the packing parameter Sp. The packing parameter is the ratio between the hydrophilic and lipophilic surfactant molecule part [70] ... [Pg.193]

Another property that characterizes solvents is their softness, in terms of the HSAB concept (Pearson 1963), according to which the interactions of soft solvents are strongest with soft solutes, of hard solvents with hard solutes, but are weaker for hard solvents with soft solutes and vice versa. The applicability of the softness property takes into account that it is superimposed on the more general electron pair donation property discussed above. In fact, it can replace (Marcus 1987) the notion of the family dependence of the P scale, expressed by the , parameter (Kamlet etal. 1985). A few quantitative scales have been... [Pg.264]

Parr and Pearson 1301 defined a parameter 17, which they called "absolute hardness" (17 V4[IP-EA]), and calculated 17 for a variety of neutral and ionic Lewis acids and bases possessing from one to four atoms. These authors showed that the qualitative predictions of the HSAB model regarding the relative reactivities of these species toward one another may be obtained using the results from simple calculations of stabilization energies using 17 and electronegativity values. [Pg.109]

Fig. 9.6 McDaniel diagram fllustraling HSAB parameters. is the difference in affinity of iwo bases, and Bh, for the hard acid Af), The reaction enthalpy. Fig. 9.6 McDaniel diagram fllustraling HSAB parameters. is the difference in affinity of iwo bases, and Bh, for the hard acid Af), The reaction enthalpy.
As cyanide ions operate as ambident nucleophiles, alkylation reactions may generate isonitriles as well as nitriles (equation 2). A whole range of parameters is responsible for the outcome of reactions of this type and their particular role together with special counter influences is not easily evaluated. There is a large and growing number of papers on this topic, but one can concentrate here on a few selected review articles.Suffice it to say that Komblum s seminal article s from 1955 is still of special importance in this field. Pearson s principle of soft and hard acids and bases (HSAB) proved to be particularly helpful in the interpretation of experimental results. ... [Pg.226]

Fig. 9.6 McDaniel diagram illustrating HSAB parameters. A, is the difference in affinity of two ba.ses, B, and Bh, for the hard acid A,. The reaction enthalpy, A//r, of Eq. 9.84 is given by the horizontal distance (or vertical distance) between the two lines of unit. slope. [Courtesy of D. H. McDaniel.I... Fig. 9.6 McDaniel diagram illustrating HSAB parameters. A, is the difference in affinity of two ba.ses, B, and Bh, for the hard acid A,. The reaction enthalpy, A//r, of Eq. 9.84 is given by the horizontal distance (or vertical distance) between the two lines of unit. slope. [Courtesy of D. H. McDaniel.I...

See other pages where HSAB hardness parameter is mentioned: [Pg.116]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.1032]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.351]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 ]




SEARCH



HSAB

Hardness parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info