0-0 hopping

The band theory applies to the perfectly regular organization of a crystal, leading to delocalized Bloch wave functions, Eq. (6). In a now classical paper, Anderson [7] has shown that disorder may result in a localization of the states. In that case, the one-electron wave function takes an exponential form 

---

An acyclic monterpene, b.p. 166-168°C, found in many essential oils, e.g. in verbena oil and oil of hops. 

It is known that even condensed films must have surface diffusional mobility Rideal and Tadayon [64] found that stearic acid films transferred from one surface to another by a process that seemed to involve surface diffusion to the occasional points of contact between the solids. Such transfer, of course, is observed in actual friction experiments in that an uncoated rider quickly acquires a layer of boundary lubricant from the surface over which it is passed [46]. However, there is little quantitative information available about actual surface diffusion coefficients. One value that may be relevant is that of Ross and Good [65] for butane on Spheron 6, which, for a monolayer, was about 5 x 10 cm /sec. If the average junction is about 10 cm in size, this would also be about the average distance that a film molecule would have to migrate, and the time required would be about 10 sec. This rate of Junctions passing each other corresponds to a sliding speed of 100 cm/sec so that the usual speeds of 0.01 cm/sec should not be too fast for pressurized film formation. See Ref. 62 for a study of another mechanism for surface mobility, that of evaporative hopping. 

The atoms on the outennost surface of a solid are not necessarily static, particularly as the surface temperature is raised. There has been much theoretical [12, 13] and experimental work (described below) undertaken to investigate surface self-diffiision. These studies have shown that surfaces actually have dynamic, changing stmetures. For example, atoms can diflfiise along a terrace to or from step edges. When atoms diflfiise across a surface, they may move by hopping from one surface site to the next, or by exchanging places with second layer atoms. 

This is no longer the case when (iii) motion along the reaction patir occurs on a time scale comparable to other relaxation times of the solute or the solvent, i.e. the system is partially non-relaxed. In this situation dynamic effects have to be taken into account explicitly, such as solvent-assisted intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) in the solute, solvent-induced electronic surface hopping, dephasing, solute-solvent energy transfer, dynamic caging, rotational relaxation, or solvent dielectric and momentum relaxation. 

Inter-atomic two-centre matrix elements (cp the hopping of electrons from one site to another. They can be described [7] as linear combmations of so-called Slater-Koster elements [9], The coefficients depend only on the orientation of the atoms / and m. in the crystal. For elementary metals described with s, p, and d basis fiinctions there are ten independent Slater-Koster elements. In the traditional fonnulation, the orientation is neglected and the two-centre elements depend only on the distance between the atoms [6]. (In several models [6,... 

Figure B3.4.17. When a wavepacket comes to a crossing point, it will split into two parts (schematic Gaussians). One will remain on the same adiabat (difFerent diabat) and the other will hop to the other adiabat (same diabat). The adiabatic curves are shown by fidl lines and denoted by ground and excited die diabatic curves are shown by dashed lines and denoted 1, 2.

The simplest approach to simulating non-adiabatic dynamics is by surface hopping [175. 176]. In its simplest fomi, the approach is as follows. One carries out classical simulations of the nuclear motion on a specific adiabatic electronic state (ground or excited) and at any given instant checks whether the diabatic potential associated with that electronic state is mtersectmg the diabatic potential on another electronic state. If it is, then a decision is made as to whedier a jump to the other adiabatic electronic state should be perfomied. 

To remedy this diflSculty, several approaches have been developed. In some metliods, the phase of the wavefunction is specified after hopping [178]. In other approaches, one expands the nuclear wavefunction in temis of a limited number of basis-set fiinctions and works out the quantum dynamical probability for jumping. For example, the quantum dynamical basis fiinctions could be a set of Gaussian wavepackets which move forward in time [147]. This approach is very powerfLil for short and intemiediate time processes, where the number of required Gaussians is not too large. 

Tully J C and Preston R K 1971 Trajectory surface hopping approach to nonadiabatic molecular collisions the reaction of H" with D2 J. Chem. Phys. 55 562... 

In addition to the configuration, electronic stmcture and thennal stability of point defects, it is essential to know how they diffuse. A variety of mechanisms have been identified. The simplest one involves the diffusion of an impurity tlirough the interstitial sites. For example, copper in Si diffuses by hopping from one tetrahedral interstitial site to the next via a saddle point at the hexagonal interstitial site. 

Terril R H ef a/1995 Monolayers in three dimensions NMR, SAXS, thermal and eleotron hopping studies of alkanethiol stabilized gold olusters J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 12 537... 

In solid state materials, single-step electron transport between dopant species is well known. For example, electron-hole recombination accounts for luminescence in some materials [H]. Multistep hopping is also well known. Models for single and multistep transport are enjoying renewed interest in tlie context of DNA electron transfer [12, 13, 14 and 15]. Indeed, tliere are strong links between tire ET literature and tire literature of hopping conductivity in polymers [16]. 

Figure C3.2.15. Schematic diagram showing (A) electron hopping between electron reservoirs via empty states of an intervening bridge, (B) tunnelling, and (C) hole hopping via filled states of an intervening bridge. From...

Henderson P T, Jones D, Hampikian G, Kan Y Z and Schuster G B 1999 Long-distance charge transport in dupiex DNA the phonon-assisted poiaron-iike hopping mechanism Proc. Natl Acad. Sc/., USA 96 8353-8... 

By using this approach, it is possible to calculate vibrational state-selected cross-sections from minimal END trajectories obtained with a classical description of the nuclei. We have studied vibrationally excited H2(v) molecules produced in collisions with 30-eV protons [42,43]. The relevant experiments were performed by Toennies et al. [46] with comparisons to theoretical studies using the trajectory surface hopping model [11,47] fTSHM). This system has also stimulated a quantum mechanical study [48] using diatomics-in-molecule (DIM) surfaces [49] and invoicing the infinite-onler sudden approximation (lOSA). 

To add non-adiabatic effects to semiclassical methods, it is necessary to allow the trajectories to sample the different surfaces in a way that simulates the population transfer between electronic states. This sampling is most commonly done by using surface hopping techniques or Ehrenfest dynamics. Recent reviews of these methods are found in [30-32]. Gaussian wavepacket methods have also been extended to include non-adiabatic effects [33,34]. Of particular interest here is the spawning method of Martinez, Ben-Nun, and Levine [35,36], which has been used already in a number of direct dynamics studies. 

The standard semiclassical methods are surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics (also known as the classical path (CP) method [197]), and they will be outlined below. More details and comparisons can be found in [30-32]. The multiple spawning method, based on Gaussian wavepacket propagation, is also outlined below. See [1] for further infomiation on both quantum and semiclassical non-adiabatic dynamics methods. 

The simplest way to add a non-adiabatic correction to the classical BO dynamics method outlined above in Section n.B is to use what is known as surface hopping. First introduced on an intuitive basis by Bjerre and Nikitin [200] and Tully and Preston [201], a number of variations have been developed [202-205], and are reviewed in [28,206]. Reference [204] also includes technical details of practical algorithms. These methods all use standard classical trajectories that use the hopping procedure to sample the different states, and so add non-adiabatic effects. A different scheme was introduced by Miller and George [207] which, although based on the same ideas, uses complex coordinates and momenta. 

After a hop has been made, adjustments have to be made to conserve the energy of a trajectory. There is a variety of ways in which this can be done, but... 

Other studies have also been made on the dynamics around a conical intersection in a model 2D system, both for dissociahve [225] and bound-state [226] problems. Comparison between surface hopping and exact calculations show reasonable agreement when the coupling between the surfaces is weak, but larger errors are found in the shong coupling limit. 

A final study that must be mentioned is a study by Haitmann et al. [249] on the ultrafast spechoscopy of the Na3p2 cluster. They derived an expression for the calculation of a pump-probe signal using a Wigner-type density mahix approach, which requires a time-dependent ensemble to be calculated after the initial excitation. This ensemble was obtained using fewest switches surface hopping, with trajectories inibally sampled from the thermalized vibronic Wigner function vertically excited onto the upper surface. 

---