Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Homogeneous kinetic measurements applications

The origins of SECM homogeneous kinetic measurements can be found in the earliest applications of ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) to profile concentration gradients at macroscopic (millimeter-sized) electrodes (1,2). The held has since developed considerably, such that short-lived intermediates in electrode reactions can now readily be identified by SECM under steady-state conditions, which would be difficult to characterize by alternative transient UME methods, such as fast scan cyclic voltammetry (8). [Pg.241]

SECM is a powerful tool for studying structures and heterogeneous processes on the micrometer and nanometer scale [8], It can probe electron, ion, and molecule transfers, and other reactions at solid-liquid, liquid-liquid, and liquid-air interfaces [9]. This versatility allows for the investigation of a wide variety of processes, from metal corrosion to adsorption to membrane transport, as discussed below. Other physicochemical applications of this method include measurements of fast homogeneous kinetics in solution and electrocatalytic processes, and characterization of redox processes in biological cells. [Pg.178]

The majority of applications of crystal population balance modeling have assumed that the solution and suspension in the crystallizer are homogeneous, i.e., the Mixed-Suspension Mixed-Product Removal (MSMPR) approximation (Randolph and Larson 1988). (This is simply the analog of the Continuous Stirred Tank (CSTR) (Levenspiel 1972) approximation for systems containing particles. It means that the system is well mixed from the standpoint of the solute concentration and the particle concentration and PSD. In addition, the effluent is assumed to have the same solute concentration, particle concentration, and PSD as the tank.) This approximation is clearly not justified when there is significant inhomogeneity in the crystallizer solution and suspension properties. For example, it is well known that nucleation kinetics measured at laboratory scale do not scale well to full scale. It is very likely that the reason they do not is because MSMPR models used to define the kinetic parameters may apply fairly well to relatively uniform laboratory crystallizers, but do considerably worse for full scale, relatively nonhomogeneous crystallizers. [Pg.194]

Heterogeneous electrode reactions can be compared with homogeneous kinetics in solution, with regard to mass transport. The second-order rate coefficient for a fast homogeneous reactions in solution, k(hom), which would be observed if diffusion were infinitely fast, can be related to the measured rate coefficient, kob3(hom) by application of Eick s first law in a spherical continuum diffusion field around the reacting molecule. At a collision distance Tab. this corresponds to the average... [Pg.564]

It is clear that the experimental curves, measured for solid-state reactions under thermoanalytical study, cannot be perfectly tied with the conventionally derived kinetic model functions (cf. previous table lO.I.), thus making impossible the full specification of any real process due to the complexity involved. The resultant description based on the so-called apparent kinetic parameters, deviates from the true portrayal and the associated true kinetic values, which is also a trivial mathematical consequence of the straight application of basic kinetic equation. Therefore, it was found useful to introduce a kind of pervasive des-cription by means of a simple empirical function, h(a), containing the smallest possible number of constant. It provides some flexibility, sufficient to match mathematically the real course of a process as closely as possible. In such case, the kinetic model of a heterogeneous reaction is assumed as a distorted case of a simpler (ideal) instance of homogeneous kinetic prototype f(a) (1-a)" [3,523,524]. It is mathematically treated by the introduction of a multiplying function a(a), i.e., h(a) =f(a) a(a), for which we coined the term [523] accommodation function and which is accountable for a certain defect state (imperfection, nonideality, error in the same sense as was treated the role of interface, e.g., during the new phase formation). [Pg.322]

In conclusion, it can be claimed that a combination of kinetic and equilibrium conductance and membrane potential measurements provides a powerful method for investigating the permselective properties of membranes of low fixed charge density. Such methods should be applicable also to other polymers useful in hyperfiltration if they can be prepared in the form of homogeneous membranes. [Pg.110]

The rate laws and hence the mechanisms of chemical reactions coupled to charge transfer can be deduced from LSV measurements. The measurements are most applicable under conditions where the charge transfer can be considered to be Nernstian and the homogeneous reactions are sufficiently rapid that dEv/d log v is a linear function, i.e. the process falls into the KP or purely kinetic zone. In the 1960s and 1970s, extensive... [Pg.174]

The response to the applied perturbation, which is generally sinusoidal, can differ in phase and amplitude from the applied signal. Measurement of the phase difference and the amplitude (i.e. the impedance) permits analysis of the electrode process in relation to contributions from diffusion, kinetics, double layer, coupled homogeneous reactions, etc. There are important applications in studies of corrosion, membranes, ionic solids, solid electrolytes, conducting polymers, and liquid/liquid interfaces. [Pg.224]

As with the kinetic analyses of homogeneous rate processes, quantitative comparisons are made between the experimentally measured data for a reaction of interest and the curve shapes of the various rate equations (Table 5.1) to identify the applicable kinetic model. This can be approached in several ways (29,105). One traditional method is to plot graphs of g(a) against time and decide which, from the available expressions (Table 5.1), provides the best (linear) representation, or fit. There is no general agreement on what criteria constitute a best or a satisfactory fit. The... [Pg.184]

The current-potential curves discussed so far can be used to measure concentrations, mass-transfer coefficients, and standard potentials. Under conditions where the electron-transfer rate at the interface is rate-determining, they can be employed to measure heterogeneous kinetic parameters as well (see Chapters 3 and 9). Often, however, one is interested in using electrochemical methods to find equilibrium constants and rate constants of homogeneous reactions that are coupled to the electron-transfer step. This section provides a brief introduction to these applications. [Pg.35]


See other pages where Homogeneous kinetic measurements applications is mentioned: [Pg.3]    [Pg.908]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.1856]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.503]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.259 , Pg.260 , Pg.261 , Pg.262 , Pg.263 , Pg.264 , Pg.265 , Pg.266 , Pg.267 , Pg.268 , Pg.269 , Pg.277 , Pg.278 , Pg.279 , Pg.280 , Pg.281 , Pg.282 , Pg.292 , Pg.293 ]




SEARCH



Homogeneous applications

Homogeneous kinetics

Homogenizer applications

Kinetic applications

Kinetic homogeneity

Kinetic homogenity

Kinetic measurement

Kinetics application

Kinetics measurements

© 2024 chempedia.info