Amphipathic helices

Residues 50-64 of the GAL4 fragment fold into an amphipathic a helix and the dimer interface is formed by the packing of these helices into a coiled coil, like those found in fibrous proteins (Chapters 3 and 14) and also in the leucine zipper families of transcription factors to be described later. The fragment of GAL4 comprising only residues 1-65 does not dimerize in the absence of DNA, but the intact GAL4 molecule does, because in the complete molecule residues between 65 and iOO also contribute to dimer interactions. 

FIGURE 6.24 (a) The alpha helix consisting of residues 153-166 (red) in flavodoxin from Anahaena is a surface helix and is amphipathic. (b) The two helices (yellow and blue) in the interior of the citrate synthase dimer (residues 260-270 in each monomer) are mostly hydrophobic, (c) The exposed helix (residues 74-87—red) of calmodulin is entirely accessible to solvent and consists mainly of polar and charged residues. 

Interestingly, certain other pore-forming toxins possess helix-bundle motifs that may participate in channel formation, in a manner similar to that proposed for colicin la. For example, the S-endotoxui produced by Bacillus thuringiensis is toxic to Coleoptera insects (beetles) and is composed of three domains, including a seven-helix bundle, a three-sheet domain, and a /3-sandwich. In the seven-helix bundle, helix 5 is highly hydrophobic, and the other six helices are amphipathic. In solution (Figure 10.32), the six amphipathic... 

FIGURE 10.35 The amino acid sequences of several amphipathic peptide antibiotics, a-Helices formed from these peptides cluster polar residues on one face of the helix, with nonpolar residues at other positions. 

As such, the magainins provide a useful initial target for peptoid-based peptido-mimetic efforts. Since the helical structure and sequence patterning of these peptides seem primarily responsible for their antibacterial activity and specificity, it is conceivable that an appropriately designed, non-peptide helix should be capable of these same activities. As previously described (Section 1.6.2), peptoids have been shown to form remarkably stable hehces, with physical characterishcs similar to those of peptide polyprohne type-I hehces (e.g. cis-amide bonds, three residues per helical turn, and 6A pitch). A faciaUy amphipathic peptoid helix design, based on the magainin structural motif, would therefore incorporate cationic residues, hydrophobic aromatic residues, and hydrophobic aliphathic residues with threefold sequence periodicity. 

The amino acid sequence of our first aPNA (which we termed backbone 1 or bl) was designed based on this amphipathic hehx sequence (Fig. 5.3 B). Specifically, this aPNA backbone included hydrophobic amino acids (Ala and Aib), internal salt bridges (Glu-(aa)3-Lys-(aa)3-Glu), a macrodipole (Asp-(aa)i5-Lys), and an N-ace-tyl cap to favor a-helix formation. The C-termini of these aPNA modules end in a carboxamide function to preclude any potential intramolecular end effects. Each aPNA module incorporates five nucleobases for Watson-Crick base pairing to a target nucleic acid sequence. 

Segrest MP et al The amphipathic alpha-helix A multifunctional structural motif in plasma lipoproteins. Adv Protein Chem... 

The hydrophobic C domain appears to start with an amphipathic membrane-spanning helix [5]. 

Amphipathic peptides contain amino acid sequences that allow them to adopt membrane active conformations [219]. Usually amphipathic peptides contain a sequence with both hydrophobic amino acids (e.g., isoleucine, valine) and hydrophilic amino acids (e.g., glutamic acid, aspartic acid). These sequences allow the peptide to interact with lipid bilayer. Depending on the peptide sequence these peptides may form a-helix or j6-sheet conformation [219]. They may also interact with different parts of the bilayer. Importantly, these interactions result in a leaky lipid bilayer and, therefore, these features are quite interesting for drug delivery application. Obviously, many of these peptides are toxic due to their strong membrane interactions. 

FIGURE 2.1 A side view of the structure of the prototype G-protein-coupled, 7TM receptor rhodopsin. The x-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin is shown with horizontal gray lines, indicating the limits of the cellular lipid membrane. The retinal ligand is shown in a space-filling model as the cloud in the middle of the structure. The seven transmembrane (7TM) helices are shown in solid ribbon form. Note that TM-III is rather tilted (see TM-III at the extracellular and intracellular end of the helix) and that kinks are present in several of the other helices, such as TM-V (to the left), TM-VI (in front of the retinal), and TM-VII. In all of these cases, these kinks are due to the presence of a well-conserved proline residue, which creates a weak point in the helical structure. These kinks are believed to be of functional importance in the activation mechanism for 7TM receptors in general. Also note the amphipathic helix-VIII which is located parallel to the membrane at the membrane interface. 

An Intracellular Amphipathic Helix Connects TM-VII to the Palmitoylation Site... 

In the x-ray structure of rhodopsin, an amphipathic helix runs parallel to the membrane from the intracellular end of TM-VII beneath the seven-helical bundle to the other side of TM-I and TM-II. At this point, one or more Cys residues are often found and are known to be subject to a dynamic posttranslational modification with palmitic acid residues. Like the phosphorylation event, the palmitoylation process appears to be dynamically regulated by receptor occupancy and is also involved in the desensitization phenomenon. The two posttranslational modifications can influence each other. For example, the conformational constraint induced by palmitoylation may alter the accessibility of certain phosphorylation sites. Like the phosphorylation process, the functional consequences of palmitoylation also appear to vary from receptor to receptor. 

These AChE forms differ in solubility and mode of membrane attachment rather than in catalytic activity. One class of molecular forms exists as homomeric assemblies of catalytic subunits that appear as monomers, dimers or tetramers (Fig. 11-7). These forms also differ in hydrophobicity, and their amphiphilic character arises from either exposure of an amphipathic helix or post-translational addition of a glycophospholipid on the carboxyl-terminal amino acid. The glycophospholipid allows the enzyme to be tethered on the external surface of the cell membrane. 

RGS domain Cystine string Amphipathic helix GGL Domain DEP Domain PDZ Domain PTB Domain Rap binding domain Loco homology domain PDZ binding motif... 

---