Standard states heat capacity

According to Reichelt and Hemminger (144), the values of the calibration constant of a DSC apparatus obtained by means of heat of fusion standards are different from those of well-known heat capacity standards. Varying the container geometry, they were able to show that there was no influence of the disturbance of steady-state conditions of heat flux on the calculated value of the enthalpy of fusion of indium. An error of 20% in the enthalpy may result if incorrectly closed containers are employed. 

Enthalpies are referred to the ideal vapor. The enthalpy of the real vapor is found from zero-pressure heat capacities and from the virial equation of state for non-associated species or, for vapors containing highly dimerized vapors (e.g. organic acids), from the chemical theory of vapor imperfections, as discussed in Chapter 3. For pure components, liquid-phase enthalpies (relative to the ideal vapor) are found from differentiation of the zero-pressure standard-state fugacities these, in turn, are determined from vapor-pressure data, from vapor-phase corrections and liquid-phase densities. If good experimental data are used to determine the standard-state fugacity, the derivative gives enthalpies of liquids to nearly the same precision as that obtained with calorimetric data, and provides reliable heats of vaporization. 

From this equation, the temperature dependence of is known, and vice versa (21). The ideal-gas state at a pressure of 101.3 kPa (1 atm) is often regarded as a standard state, for which the heat capacities are denoted by CP and Real gases rarely depart significantly from ideaHty at near-ambient pressures (3) therefore, and usually represent good estimates of the heat capacities of real gases at low to moderate, eg, up to several hundred kPa, pressures. Otherwise thermodynamic excess functions are used to correct for deviations from ideal behavior when such situations occur (3). 

The interpretation of AC is that it is the difference in the standard molar heat capacities of the transition state and the reactants. Values of AC for the solvolysis of neutral molecules lie in the range 0 to -400 J mol-1 K l. The need for high-precision determinations of k (and 77) is emphasized by these values. 

A number of other thermodynamic properties of adamantane and diamantane in different phases are reported by Kabo et al. [5]. They include (1) standard molar thermodynamic functions for adamantane in the ideal gas state as calculated by statistical thermodynamics methods and (2) temperature dependence of the heat capacities of adamantane in the condensed state between 340 and 600 K as measured by a scanning calorimeter and reported here in Fig. 8. According to this figure, liquid adamantane converts to a solid plastic with simple cubic crystal structure upon freezing. After further cooling it moves into another solid state, an fee crystalline phase. 

At room temperature, atactic polystyrene is well below its glass transition temperature of approximately 100 °C. In this state, it is an amorphous glassy material that is brittle, stiff, and transparent. Due to its relatively low glass transition temperature, low heat capacity, and lack of crystallites we can readily raise its temperature until it softens. In its molten state, it is quite thermally stable so we can mold it into useful items by most of the standard conversion processes. It is particularly well suited to thermoforming due to its high melt viscosity. As it has no significant polarity, it is a good electrical insulator. 

The value of this standard molar Gibbs energy, p°(T), found in data compilations, is obtained by integration from 0 K of the heat capacity determined by the translational, rotational, vibrational and electronic energy levels of the gas. These are determined experimentally by spectroscopic methods [14], However, contrary to what we shall see for condensed phases, the effect of pressure often exceeds the effect of temperature. Hence for gases most attention is given to the equations of state. 

In addition to the intermolecular potential, there is an intramolecular portion of the Helmholtz free energy. Cheetah uses a polyatomic model to account for this portion including electronic, vibrational, and rotational states. Such a model can be expressed conveniently in terms of the heat of formation, standard entropy, and constant-pressure heat capacity of each species. 

Information on partial molar heat capacities [1,18] is indeed very scarce, hindering the calculation of the temperature correction terms for reactions in solution. In most practical situations, we can only hope that these temperature corrections are similar to those derived for the standard state reactions. Fortunately, due to the upper limits set by the normal boiling temperatures of the solvents, the temperatures of reactions in solution are not substantially different from 298.15 K, so large ArCp(T - 298.15) corrections are uncommon. 

In equations 7.27 and 7.28 m(BA), m(cot), m(crbl), and m(wr) are the masses of benzoic acid sample, cotton thread fuse, platinum crucible, and platinum fuse wire initially placed inside the bomb, respectively n(02) is the amount of substance of oxygen inside the bomb n(C02) is the amount of substance of carbon dioxide formed in the reaction Am(H20) is the difference between the mass of water initially present inside the calorimeter proper and that of the standard initial calorimetric system and cy (BA), cy(Pt),cy (cot), Cy(02), and Cy(C02)are the heat capacities at constant volume of benzoic acid, platinum, cotton, oxygen, and carbon dioxide, respectively. The terms e (H20) and f(sin) represent the effective heat capacities of the two-phase systems present inside the bomb in the initial state (liquid water+water vapor) and in the final state (final bomb solution + water vapor), respectively. In the case of the combustion of compounds containing the elements C, H, O, and N, at 298.15 K, these terms are given by [44]... 

References (20, 22, 23, 24, 29, and 74) comprise the series of Technical Notes 270 from the Chemical Thermodynamics Data Center at the National Bureau of Standards. These give selected values of enthalpies and Gibbs energies of formation and of entropies and heat capacities of pure compounds and of aqueous species in their standard states at 25 °C. They include all inorganic compounds of one and two carbon atoms per molecule. 

For a Gas. The procedure for the calculation of the entropy of a gas in its standard state is substantially the same as the that for a solid or liquid except for two factors. If the heat capacity data have been obtained at a pressure of 1 atm (101.325 kPa), the resultant value of Sjj, is appropriate for that pressure and must be corrected to the standard state pressure of 1 bar (0.1 MPa). This correction is given by... 

The standard state for the heat capacity is the same as that for the enthalpy. For a proof of this statement for the solute in a solution, see Exercise 2 in this chapter. This choice of standard state for components of a solution is different fixjm that used by many thermodynamicists. It seems preferable to the choice of a 1-bar standard state, however, because it is more consistent with the extrapolation procedure by which the standard state is determined experimentally, and it leads to a value of the activity coefficient equal to 1 when the solution is ideal or very dilute whatever the pressure. It is also preferable to a choice of the pressure of the solution, because that choice produces a different standard state for each solution. For an alternative point of view, see Ref. 2. 

We have seen in chapter 2 that the heat capacity at constant P is of fundamental importance in the calculation of the Gibbs free energy, performed by starting from the standard state enthalpy and entropy values... 

As shown by Helgeson et al. (1978), satisfactory estimates of standard state molar entropy for crystalline solids can be obtained through reversible exchange reactions involving the compound of interest and an isostructural solid (as for heat capacity, but with a volume correction). Consider the generalized exchange reaction... 

Standard state entropy values and Maier-Kelley coefficients of heat capacity at constant P, with respective T limits of validity, are listed for the same components in table 5.13. The adopted polynomial expansion is the Haas-Fisher form ... 

Table 5.13 Selected standard state entropy Sx, p/, T, = 298.15 K, = 1 bar) and Maier-Kelley coefficients of heat capacity function. References as in table 5.12. Data in J/(mole X K).

Table 5.36 Thermodynamic properties of pure pyroxene components in their various structural forms according to Saxena (1989) (1), Berman (1988) (2), and Holland and Powell (1990) (3) database. = standard state entropy of pure component at 7) = 298.15 K and Py = bar (J/mole) Hjp p = enthalpy of formation from elements at same standard state conditions. Isobaric heat capacity function Cp is... 

If the heat capacity functions of the various terms in the reaction are known and their molar enthalpy, molar entropy, and molar volume at the 2) and i). of reference (and their isobaric thermal expansion and isothermal compressibility) are also all known, it is possible to calculate AG%x at the various T and P conditions of interest, applying to each term in the reaction the procedures outlined in section 2.10, and thus defining the equilibrium constant (and hence the activity product of terms in reactions cf eq. 5.272 and 5.273) or the locus of the P-T points of univariant equilibrium (eq. 5.274). If the thermodynamic data are fragmentary or incomplete—as, for instance, when thermal expansion and compressibility data are missing (which is often the case)—we may assume, as a first approximation, that the molar volume of the reaction is independent of the P and T intensive variables. Adopting as standard state for all terms the state of pure component at the P and T of interest and applying... 

If the heat capacity of the molten component is known (cf section 6.6.2), molar enthalpy and molar entropy at the standard state of the pure melt at T = 298.15 and P = 1 bar may be readily derived by applying... 

---