Heat capacity determination

The value of this standard molar Gibbs energy, p°(T), found in data compilations, is obtained by integration from 0 K of the heat capacity determined by the translational, rotational, vibrational and electronic energy levels of the gas. These are determined experimentally by spectroscopic methods [14], However, contrary to what we shall see for condensed phases, the effect of pressure often exceeds the effect of temperature. Hence for gases most attention is given to the equations of state. 

The estimated d is about 90 K, in agreement with previous heat capacity determinations performed on single crystals (Coleman et al, 1973a). Table 1.5 shows some d values found in the literature for some MOMs. 

In order to obtain accurate results, this function should be accounted for when the temperature of a reaction mass tends to vary over a wider range. However, in the condensed phase the variation of heat capacity with temperature is small. Moreover, in case of doubt and for safety purposes, the specific heat capacity should be approximated by lower values. Thus, the effect of temperature can be ignored and generally the heat capacity determined at a (lower) process temperature is used for the calculation of the adiabatic temperature rise. 

The reactor is charged with 1000 kg of a 10 wt. % H2SO4 solution and 200 kg of 1-hexene at 300 K. Assuming that the heat capacities for the reactants and products do not vary with temperature, the heat of reaction does not vary with temperature, and the presence of H2SO4 is ignored in the calculation of the heat capacity, determine the time required to achieve 50 percent conversion and the reactor temperature at that point. 

Tests on an adiabatic gas turbine (expander)yield values for inlet conditions (Ti, P ) and outlet conditions (72, P2)- Assuming ideal gases with constant heat capacities, determine the turbine efficiency for one of the following ... 

Kybett et al. ( ) have determined the enthalpy of combustion of the liquid form under its own pressure using the sample from the heat capacity determinations (2 ). ... 

Other studies (8-13) are considered for comparison with and confirmation of the adopted values, but they are not Included in the polynomial fitting procedure. The heat capacity results of Mannchen and Bornkessel (8), 12-300 K, were presented only graphically and support the results of Craig et al. (JL). The quantitative agreement is uncertain since it is not clear If the authors (8) were aware of the correction required for the data of Chraig et al. (1 ). Clusius and Vaughn (9) made experimental heat capacity determinations in the range 11-228 K. These data scatter about the selected values within 2-4%. 

An exhaustive survey of different experimental calorimetric techniques used for heat capacity determination was given very recently by Gaune-Escard (2002) and is excerpted here with her kind permission. 

Figure 4.5. Heat capacity determination by the ratio method.

Stelen, Fjellvag, Gr0nvold, Sipowska, and Westrum [96STO/FJE] measured the heat capacity of a-CuSe in the temperature range 5 to 653 K using adiabatic shield calorimetry. The heat capacity determined at 298.15 K is selected ... 

The heat capacity constant (KCp) is determined by first subtracting or adding the baseline (empty pan) values as appropriate from the sample and calibration reversing heat capacity data. The baseline-corrected measured reversing heat capacity for the aluminum oxide is compared to the expected heat capacity, determined from the literature heat capacity data as follows ... 

Bonell [72BON] used levitation calorimetry to measure the heat content of liquid zirconium in the temperature range 2233 to 3048 K, referring to a reference temperature of 2128 K (the melting point of zirconium see Section V. 1.1.1). The data obtained were linear with respect to temperature (Figure V-6) indicating that the heat capacity of the liquid phase is a constant. The value of the heat capacity determined for liquid zirconium from the data of [72BON] is ... 

The difference in the heat capacity determined in this study with the earlier work of [44KEL] was found to be negligible whereas the data from [90NEV/FAN] was found to be only slightly higher. This review agrees with this conclusion. The data from this study is accepted by this review and has been re-evaluated to determine the appropriate uncertainty in the heat capacity and associated thermochemical parameters. 

For heat capacity determinations with normal DSC and MDSC systems, heat capacity calibration is performed by scanning a heat capacity standard, such as sapphire. This calibrates the system for Cp values and is used in separating the heat capacity component from the total heat flow. 

Polymer chemists use DSC extensively to study percent crystallinity, crystallization rate, polymerization reaction kinetics, polymer degradation, and the effect of composition on the glass transition temperature, heat capacity determinations, and characterization of polymer blends. Materials scientists, physical chemists, and analytical chemists use DSC to study corrosion, oxidation, reduction, phase changes, catalysts, surface reactions, chemical adsorption and desorption (chemisorption), physical adsorption and desorption (physisorp-tion), fundamental physical properties such as enthalpy, boiling point, and equdibrium vapor pressure. DSC instruments permit the purge gas to be changed automatically, so sample interactions with reactive gas atmospheres can be studied. 

For the cure studies in this work, this deviation is not so important. Firstly, because most of the MTDSC experiments are performed above —50°C, and secondly, because for quantitative analyses a mobility factor is calculated by normalising the heat capacity between reference heat capacities determined at the same temperature. Thus, changes in Kc with temperature have no effect on this result (section 5.8). 

Main applications of thermal analysis are (1) Soil and clay analysis (2) Determination of Glass transition (3) Compositional effects on glass transition (4) Heat capacity determination (5) Characterization of polymer blends (6) Study the effects of additives added to polymer (7) Polymer degradation analysis (8) Crystallinity and crystallization rate study and (9) Reaction kinetic studies. 

---