Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Heart failure evaluation

Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, Meurers G, Cowley AJ, Thomas I et al. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE). Lancet 1997 349(9054) 747-52. [Pg.223]

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Heart failure Evaluation and treatment of patients with left ventricular systolic dysftmction. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998 46 525-9. [Pg.387]

The calcium channel blockers generally are considered seconder third-line options for preventive treatment when other drugs with established clinical benefit are ineffective or contraindicated. Verapamil is the most widely used calcium chaimel blocker for preventive treatment, but it provided only modest benefit in decreasing the frequency of attacks in two placebo-controlled studies." The therapeutic effect of verapamil may not be noted for up to 8 weeks after initiation of therapy. Side effects of verapamil may include constipation, hypotension, bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and exacerbation of congestive heart failure. Evaluations of nifedipine, nimodipine, diltiazem, and nicardipine have yielded equivocal results. ... [Pg.1116]

Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen AK, et al. Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation 2002 106 2078-84. [Pg.94]

Expert opinion is a source, frequently elicited by survey, that is used to obtain information where no or few data are available. For example, in our experience with a multicountry evaluation of health care resource utilization in atrial fibrillation, very few country-specific published data were available on this subject. Thus the decision-analytic model was supplemented with data from a physician expert panel survey to determine initial management approach (rate control vs. cardioversion) first-, second-, and third-line agents doses and durations of therapy type and frequency of studies that would be performed to initiate and monitor therapy type and frequency of adverse events, by body system and the resources used to manage them place of treatment and adverse consequences of lack of atrial fibrillation control and cost of these consequences, for example, stroke, congestive heart failure. This method may also be used in testing the robustness of the analysis [30]. [Pg.583]

Unlike systolic HF, few prospective trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of various cardiac medications in patients with diastolic HF or preserved ejection fraction. The Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) study demonstrated that angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan resulted in beneficial effects on HF morbidity in patients with preserved LVEF similar to those seen in depressed LV function.25... [Pg.51]

Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 38 2101-2113. [Pg.61]

Biguanides such as metformin are thought to inhibit mitochondrial oxidation of lactic acid, thereby increasing the chance of lactic acidosis occurring. Fortunately, the incidence of lactic acidosis in clinical practice is rare. Patients at greatest risk for developing lactic acidosis include those with liver disease or heavy alcohol use, severe infection, heart failure, and shock. Thus, it is common practice to evaluate liver function prior to initiation of metformin. [Pg.656]

PI. Pacher, R Stanek, B., HUlsmann, M Koller-Strametz, J Berger, R., Schuller, M., Hartter, E Ogris, E., Frey, B., Heinz, G., and Maurer, G Prognostic impact of big endothelin-1 plasma concentrations compared with invasive hemodynamic evaluation in severe heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 27,633-641 (1996). [Pg.124]

FIGURE 78-1. Diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of hyponatremia. (CHF, congestive heart failure EABV, effective arterial blood volume SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone UNa, urine sodium concentration Uosm, urine osmolality.)... [Pg.896]

Flosequinan has a positive inotropic effect and shows a tendency to increase the heart rate, atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial fibrillation and neurohormonal activation. Although the precise mechanisms involved have remained unclear up to now [29], this drug has been used to treat congestive heart failure (CHF). The FDA approved flosequinan (Manoplax) in 1993. However, the drug was withdrawn a year later because the PROFILE (prospective randomized flosequinan longevity evaluation) study indicated that flosequinan had adverse effects on survival, and that beneficial effects on the symptoms of heart failure did not last beyond the first 3 months of therapy, after which patients on the dmg had a higher rate of hospitalization than patients taking a placebo [14]. [Pg.7]

QT prolongation, recent acute Ml, uncompensated heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia). Discontinue treatment if the QT interval is over 500 msec. Patients who experience symptoms that may be associated with the occurrence of torsade de pointes (eg, dizziness, palpitations, syncope) may warrant further cardiac evaluation in particular, consider Holter monitoring. [Pg.1102]

The results of MADIT II were met with some skepticism, but later confirmed by the recent Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) [24]. This study evaluated the benefit of ICD therapy versus amiodarone or placebo as primary prevention in over 2,500 patients with stable NYHA class II or III heart failure and EF < 35%, without the requirement for NSVT or EPS. Patients with both ischemic and nonischemic etiologies for cardiomyopathy were included. Over a follow-up of 4 years, there was no benefit of amiodarone over placebo for overall mortality, but ICD therapy resulted in a significant 23% reduction in overall mortality [p = 0.007] (Fig. 3.5). The benefit of ICD therapy was comparable for ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. [Pg.44]


See other pages where Heart failure evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.812]    [Pg.1297]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.788]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.53]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.365 ]




SEARCH



Diastolic heart failure evaluation

Heart failure evaluation of therapeutic outcomes

Heart failure, chronic evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info