Hartree-Fock equations/theory configuration interaction

As we have already observed above, within the hardness (interaction) representation (see Tables 1, 3) the FF indices provide important weighting factors in combination formulas which express the global CS and potentials in terms of the local properties, relevant for the resolution in question. The FF expressions from the EE equations are invalid in the MO resolution, since no equalization of the orbital potentials can take place, due to obvious constraints on the MO occupations in the Hartree-Fock (HF) theory [61]. Moreover, standard chain-rule transformations of derivatives are not applicable in the MO resolution since some of the derivatives involved are not properly defined. Various approaches to the local FF, f(f), have been proposed e.g., those expressing f(f), in terms of the frontier orbital densities [11, 25], or the spin densities [38]. Also the finite difference estimates of the chemical potential (electronegativity) and hardness have been proposed in the MO and Kohn-Sham theories for various electron configurations [10, 11, 19, 52, 61b, 62, 63]. 

In the Hartree-Fock equations explicit electron-electron interactions are neglected. To meet this drawback the Hartree-Fock approach has been upgraded by several so-called post-Hartree-Fock methods, as there are Moller-Plesset perturbation theory, configuration interaction, or the... 

Caricato M et al (2009) Using the ONIOM hybrid method to apply equation of motion CCSD to larger systems benchmarking and comparison with time-dependent density functional theory, configuration interaction singles, and time-dependent Hartree-Fock. J Chem Phys 131 12... 

In the RISM-SCF theory, the statistical solvent distribution around the solute is determined by the electronic structure of the solute, whereas the electronic strucmre of the solute is influenced by the surrounding solvent distribution. Therefore, the ab initio MO calculation and the RISM equation must be solved in a self-consistent manner. It is noted that SCF (self-consistent field) applies not only to the electronic structure calculation but to the whole system, e.g., a self-consistent treatment of electronic structure and solvent distribution. The MO part of the method can be readily extended to the more sophisticated levels beyond Hartree-Fock (HF), such as configuration interaction (Cl) and coupled cluster (CC). 

The value of 3 and its dispersion can be theoretically calculated from equation 6, provided a complete set of electron states of the system is known. Such quantum mechanical calculations have been developed based on molecular Hartree-Fock theory including configuration interactions( 1 3). A detailed theoretical analysis of 3 and contributing 1T -electron states has been presented for several important molecular structures. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

Two general groups of methodologies are used to solve the Schrodinger equation in combination with cluster models, the Hartree-Fock (HF) approach and related methods to include correlation effects like Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) or configuration interaction (Cl) [58,59] and the Density Functional Theory (DFT) approach [59,60]. 

Accounting for relativistic effects in computational organotin studies becomes complicated, because Hartree-Fock (HF), density functional theory (DFT), and post-HF methods such as n-th order Mpller-Plesset perturbation (MPn), coupled cluster (CC), and quadratic configuration interaction (QCI) methods are non-relativistic. Relativistic effects can be incorporated in quantum chemical methods with Dirac-Hartree-Fock theory, which is based on the four-component Dirac equation. " Unformnately the four-component Flamiltonian in the all-electron relativistic Dirac-Fock method makes calculations time consuming, with calculations becoming 100 times more expensive. The four-component Dirac equation can be approximated by a two-component form, as seen in the Douglas-Kroll (DK) Hamiltonian or by the zero-order regular approximation To address the electron cor-... 

The scientifically orthodox resolution of this difficulty is spelled out in many places (e.g., McWeeny, 1979, ch. 5). MO and VB theories are shown to be alternative first steps in a pair of schemes designed to successively approximate to an accurate quantum mechanical solution for the structure of a molecule. One aspect of this process that makes it seem a little less convincing is that the later steps in the approximation schemes differ markedly from the first. For example, with MO theory, a series of MO-Uke steps of successive approximation leads not to an accurate solution of the equations that arise from quantum theory but to the Hartree Fock limit. It is only by taking a rather different type of step, quite out of tune with the basis of the molecular orbital method—configuration interaction or some alternative—that the quantum theory solution can be approximated. 

Configuration Interaction Density Functional Theory Equation of Motion CCSD Multiconfiguration-SCF Moller Plesset 2nd Order Multireference Cl Multistate CASPT2 Restricted Active Space SCF Restricted Hartree Fock Symmetry Adapted Cluster-CI Self Consistent Field Singlestate CASPT2... 

---