Glutamic acid mechanism

In transamination an amine group is transferred from L glutamic acid to pyruvic acid An outline of the mechanism of transamination is presented m Figure 27 4... 

Crystallization Method. Such methods as mechanical separation, preferential crystallisation, and substitution crystallisation procedures are included in this category. The preferential crystallisation method is the most popular. The general procedure is to inoculate a saturated solution of the racemic mixture with a seed of the desired enantiomer. Resolutions by this method have been reported for histidine (43), glutamic acid (44), DOPA (45), threonine (46), A/-acetyl phenylalanine (47), and others. In the case of glutamic acid, the method had been used for industrial manufacture (48). 

The reaction mechanism for glutamate racemase has been studied extensively. It has been proposed that the key for the racemization activity is that the two cysteine residues of the enzyme are located on both sides of the substrate bound to the active site. Thus, one cysteine residue abstracts the a-proton from the substrate, while the other detivers a proton from the opposite side of the intermediate enolate of the amino acid. In this way, the racemase catalyzes the racemization of glutamic acid via a so-called two-base mechanism (Fig. 15). 

S. W. Fox (from 1984, director of the Institute for Molecular and Cellular Evolution of the University of Miami) made the highly controversial suggestion that the amino acid sequences in the proteinoids are not random. Nakashima prepared a thermal polymer from glutamic acid, glycine and tyrosine the analysis showed that two tyrosine-containing tripeptides had been formed pyr-Glu-Gly-Tyr and pyr-Glu-Tyr-Gly (Nakashima et al 1977). The result was confirmed (Hartmann, 1981). A closer examination of the reaction mechanism showed that the formation of these two tripeptides under the reaction conditions used depends on three parameters ... 

The precise mechanism of dimethylhydrazine toxicity is uncertain. In addition to the contact irritant effects, the acute effects of dimethylhydrazine exposure may involve the central nervous system as exemplified by tremors and convulsions (Shaffer and Wands 1973) and behavioral changes at sublethal doses (Streman et al. 1969). Back and Thomas (1963) noted that the deaths probably involve respiratory arrest and cardiovascular collapse. The central nervous system as a target is consistent with the delayed latency in response reported for dimethylhydrazine (Back and Thomas 1963). There is some evidence that 1,1-dimethylhydrazine may act as an inhibitor of glutamic acid decarboxylase, thereby adversely affecting the aminobutyric acid shunt, and could explain the latency of central-nervous-system effects (Back and Thomas 1963). Furthermore, vitamin B6 analogues that act as coenzymes in the aminobutyric acid shunt have been shown to be effective antagonists to 1,1-dimethylhydrazine toxicity (reviewed in Back and Thomas 1963). 

Plaquet et al. (PI) found in the urine of rachitic children peptides consisting of proline, hydroxyproline, and glycine, which they believed to be the products of collagen degradation. Two similar peptides containing considerable amounts of proline and hydroxyproline were isolated from the urine of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis by Mechanic et al. (Ml). One of these peptides consisted of three proline, two hydroxyproline, and nine glutamic acid residues, the second one consisted of four proline, four hydroxyproline, and one glutamic acid residues. The N-terminal amino acid in the first peptide was demonstrated to be hydroxyproline. 

Polymorphs and solvated crystals is generally observed in pharmacentical indnstry [1], The bioavailability, stability, solnbility, and morphology of the pharmacentical products are very influenced by polymorphs [2-7], therefore the control of the polymorphic crystallization is very important. The crystallization process of polymorphs and solvated crystals is composed of competitive nucleation, growth, and transformation from a meta-stable form to a stable form [4], Furthermore, the crystallization behavior is influenced by various controlling factors such as temperature, supersaturation, additives and solvents [8], In order to perform the selective crystallization of the polymorphs, the mechanism of each elementary step in the crystallization process and the key controlling factor needs to be elucidated [8], On the other hand, we reported for L-Glutamic acid and L-Histidine system previously [4] that the nucleation and transformation behaviors of polymorphs depend on the molecular stractures. If the relationship between molecular stmcture and polymorphic crystallization behavior is known, the prediction of the polymorphism may become to be possible for the related compound. However, detail in such relationship is not clearly understood. 

The mechanism of interaction of amino acids at solid/ aqueous solution interfaces has been investigated through adsorption and electrokinetic measurements. Isotherms for the adsorption of glutamic acid, proline and lysine from aqueous solutions at the surface of rutile are quite different from those on hydroxyapatite. To delineate the role of the electrical double layer in adsorption behavior, electrophoretic mobilities were measured as a function of pH and amino acid concentrations. Mechanisms for interaction of these surfactants with rutile and hydroxyapatite are proposed, taking into consideration the structure of the amino acid ions, solution chemistry and the electrical aspects of adsorption. 

General acid catalysis by glutamic acid-35 represents at present the mechanism for lysozyme best able to explain the kinetic and structural data. For it to occur, however, distortion of the hexose ring in subsite D to a half-chair must take place so that relief of strain in the transition state will make bond breaking sufficiently easy. A question that must be answered for this picture to be tenable is whether relief of strain can so greatly facilitate bond breaking when the carbonium ion is a glycosyl ion [see also the discussion in Fife (1972) and Atkinson and Bruice (1974)]. 

---