General Many-Electron Formalism

For the sake of brevity, we proceed in presenting a pragmatic approach to relativistic electronic structure theory, which is justified by its close analogy to the nonrelativistic theory and the fact that most of the finer relativistic aspects must be neglected for calculations on any atom or molecule with more than a few electrons. For a recent comprehensive account on the foundations of relativistic electronic structure theory we refer to Quiney et al. (1998b). 

The electron-electron interaction is usually supposed to be well described by the instantaneous Coulomb interaction operator l/rn. Also, all interactions with the nuclei whose internal structure is not resolved, like electron-nucleus attraction and nucleus-nucleus repulsion, are supposed to be of this type. Of course, corrections to these approximations become important in certain cases where a high accuracy is sought, especially in computing the term values and transition probabilities of atomic spectroscopy. For example, the Breit correction to the electron-electron Coulomb interaction should not be neglected in fine-structure calculations and in the case of highly charged ions. However, in general, and particularly for standard chemical purposes, these corrections become less important. 

Four-component quantum mechanical methods for the calculation of the electronic structure of atoms, molecules and solids are based on the n-electron Hamiltonian 

The appropriately chosen electron-nucleus potential is denoted as Vnuc(0- Usually, we shift the energy scale with /T = /3 — 1 to yield energy expectation values which are directly comparable with those obtained from nonrelativistic calculations. 

In the case of polynuclear systems like molecules and solids, it is common to use the standard nonrelativistic Born-Oppenheimer approximation for the separation of 

---

So far we have studied the general many-electron problem of electrons and Nion fixed or very slow ions. Let us now apply the above-developed formalism to molecules and solids. 

In what follows, we present in this short review, the basic formalism of TDDFT of many-electron systems (1) for periodic TD scalar potentials, and also (2) for arbitrary TD electric and magnetic fields in a generalized manner. Practical schemes within the framework of quantum hydrodynamical approach as well as the orbital-based TD single-particle Schrodinger-like equations are presented. Also discussed is the linear response formalism within the framework of TDDFT along with a few miscellaneous aspects. 

Resonances are common and unique features of elastic and inelastic collisions, photodissociation, unimolecular decay, autoionization problems, and related topics. Their general behavior and formal description are rather universal and identical for nuclear, electronic, atomic, or molecular scattering. Truhlar (1984) contains many examples of resonances in various fields of atomic and molecular physics. Resonances are particularly interesting if more than one degree of freedom is involved they reflect the quasi-bound states of the Hamiltonian and reveal a great deal of information about the multi-dimensional PES, the internal energy transfer, and the decay mechanism. A quantitative analysis based on time-dependent perturbation theory follows in the next section. 

The shared features of quantum cell models are specified orbitals, matrix elements and spin conservation. As emphasized by Hubbard[5] for d-electron metals and by Soos and Klein [11] for organic crystals of 7r-donors or 7r-acceptors, the operators o+, and apa in (1), (3) and (4) can rigorously be identified with exact many-electron states of atoms or molecules. The provisos are to restrict the solid-state basis to four states per site (empty, doubly occupied, spin a and spin / ) and to stop associating the matrix elements with specific integrals. The relaxation of core electrons is formally taken into account. Such generalizations increase the plausibility of the models and account for their successes, without affecting their solution or interpretation. 

A typical electronic spectrum of a M(4-TCPyP) complex is shown in Fig. 16 (39,123,170,176,182,183). In general, the electronic transitions in the porphyrin center exhibit many similarities with those observed in the spectra of the M(4-TRPyP) species, with the Soret band typically in the range of 414- 75 nm, and the Qi and Qo o bands in the range of 557-584 and 611-645 nm, respectively. In the formal Ru(III)Ru(III)Ru(III) oxidation state, the characteristic intracluster band is observed in the 685-707-nm range, while the RusO py MLCT band can be found in the 314—351 -nm range. The spectral data of a series of M-4TCPyP derivatives are listed in Table II. 

Because the convenience of the one-electron formalism is retained, DFT methods can easily take into account the scalar relativistic effects and spin-orbit effects, via either perturbation or variational methods. The retention of the one-electron picture provides a convenient means of analyzing the effects of relativity on specific orbitals of a molecule. Spin-unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) calculations usually suffer from spin contamination, particularly in systems that have low-lying excited states (such as metal-containing systems). By contrast, in spin-unrestricted Kohn-Sham (UKS) DFT calculations the spin-contamination problem is generally less significant for many open-shell systems (39). For example, for transition metal methyl complexes, the deviation of the calculated UKS expectation values S (S = spin angular momentum operator) from the contamination-free theoretical values are all less than 5% (32). 

In the present paper, we shall discuss a method for generating many-electron states of a given symmetry using Kramers pair creation operators and other symmetry-preserving pair creation and annihilation operators. We will first develop the formalism for the case where orthonormality between the orbitals of different configurations can be assumed. Afterwards we will extend the method to cases where this orthonormality is lost, so that the method also can be used in generalized Sturmian calculations [11-13] and in valence bond calculations. 

This so-called reverse lexical ordering gives the upper path 123 index 1 and the lower path 456 index 20. If we have a situation where the Cl space is dominated by the reference determinant it is of course convenient to number the active spinor set in such a way that the occupied spinors of this determinant precede the unoccupied spinors. This gives this determinant index 1 while determinants that differ in many places from it and are likely to contribute little to the Cl wave function receive the highest indices. Since the size of the full Cl space increases factorially with the number of spinors it is usually not feasible to allow all possible determinants to contribute to the many-electron wave function. In non-relativistic calculations several ways to reduce the size of a full Cl space to more tractable dimensions are used. One example is the General Active Space formalism [35] that provides a very general and convenient way to handle various choices of Cl spaces. 

By comparison with the situation when the first observation of C ) was made, there is now a much clearer theoretical understanding of the chemistry and physics of carbon. Ceo is now known to bejust one of many molecular allotropes of carbon, which can be counted, constructed as molecular graphs and in 3D space, and assigned to a limited number of point groups with characteristic NMR signatures. A general if not formally complete picture of the link between their electronic structures and molecular... 

Basing on the first principles of Quantum mechanics as exposed in the previous chapters and sections, special chapters of quantum theory are here unfolded in order to further extend and caching the quantum information from free to observed evolution within the matter systems with constraints (boundaries). As such, the Feynman path integral formalism is firstly exposed and then applied to atomic, quantum barrier and quantum harmonically vibration, followed by density matrix approach, opening the Hartree-Fock and Density Functional pictures of many-electronic systems, with a worthy perspective of electronic occupancies via Koopmans theorem, while ending with a further generalization of the Heisenberg observability and of its first application to mesosystems. 

M. Esser. Direct MRCl Method for the Calculation of Relativistic Many-Electron Wavefunction. 1. General Formalism. Int. 

These lectures present an introduction to density functionals for non-relativistic Coulomb systems. The reader is assumed to have a working knowledge of quantum mechanics at the level of one-particle wavefunctions (r) [1]. The many-electron wavefunction f (ri,r2,..., rjv) [2] is briefly introduced here, and then replaced as basic variable by the electron density n(r). Various terms of the total energy are defined as functionals of the electron density, and some formal properties of these functionals are discussed. The most widely-used density functionals - the local spin density and generalized gradient... 

---