General Human Behaviors

Professionals working in the area of human factors have studied humans in regard to their expected behaviors. To minimize safety-related problems, knowledge of these expected or general human behaviors is considered essential. Some of the general or typical human behaviors are as follows [25,26]  

Most people fail to recheck specified procedures for errors. 

1 Human consistency can be low. Machines are consistent, unless there are failures. 

2 Humans require some motivation. Machines require no motivation. 

3 Humans may be absent from work due to various reasons induding strikes, training, illness, and personal matters. Machines are subject to malfunctions or failures. 

---

There are three generally accepted criteria for validating animal models for human psychiatric disorders face validity, construct validity, and predictive validity. Face validity refers to the outward appearance of the model, i.e. does the animal s behavior adequately reflect the human behavior being modeled In this dimension, anxiety models have a clear advantage over other psychiatric models it is usually quite apparent if an animal is frightened, whereas it is a much more difficult to assess whether an animal is displaying psychotic-like or depressive-like behavior, for example. 

Campbell, D. P. (1995). The psychological test profiles of Brigadier Generals Warmongers or decisive warriors In D. Lubinski R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior (pp. 145—175). Palo Alto, CA Davies-Black. 

Similar to LSD and other monoamine hallucinogens, mescaline suppresses locomotor and exploratory behavior in novel environments (Wing et al. 1990). Also similar to LSD, tolerance develops to the behavioral effects of chronic doses of mescaline (Murray et al. 1977). Mescaline increases aggression in rat models (Sbordone et al. 1978) however, this is an elicited aggression (by electric shock) and does not necessarily generalize to human behavior. Increased aggression is not characteristic of humans using mescaline. 

Finally, the MOS should also take into account the uncertainties in the estimated exposure. For predicted exposure estimates, this requires an uncertainty analysis (Section 8.2.3) involving the determination of the uncertainty in the model output value, based on the collective uncertainty of the model input parameters. General sources of variability and uncertainty in exposure assessments are measurement errors, sampling errors, variability in natural systems and human behavior, limitations in model description, limitations in generic or indirect data, and professional judgment. 

Second, it clearly demonstrates that we can master simple, safe, and economical self-hypnosis techniques. This observation has broad implications for psychiatry, for medicine, and for human behavior generally. That a voluntary practice can influence even so highly automatic and... 

It demonstrates that exposure of the general population or specific groups is occurring. Classical exposure pathway analyses are hypothetical constructs with many assumptions about human behaviors that lead to exposure. The finding of a chemical in blood or urine documents that exposure has occurred and may indicate whether exposure is widespread or occurs only in isolated cases. 

Air, water, and food are the minunum essentials for immediate human survival. Air and water are generally available in most places on earth. The quest for food often dominates human behavior and directly affects many aspects of human society, including group size and social organization, residence patterns, technology, and transportation. Many fundamental questions in archeology revolve around the nature of human diet and sources of food. 

General design requirements for expert systems have been identified by researches in Artificial Intelligence (AI) (9). More recently, the human behavior in engineering or psycho-engineering concepts have been introduced into the expert opinion (8). 

Believing that Scientists now generally agree that human behavior is caused rather than willed, Bazelon thinks he has solved the problem of justice all that is needed are more scientific facts about the defendant. In this New Jerusalem, justice is dispensed not with even-handed impartiality but with tender-hearted psychodynamic insight. What is usually required of the [psychiatric] experts, explains Bazelon, is a statement in simple terms of why the accused acted as he did—the psychodynamics of his behavior. . . Where it occurs, under the Durham rule [handed down by Bazelon], the accused may be seen as a sick person and confined to a hospital for treatment, not to a prison for punishment. This is just the point In the courtroom, the more we talk about the psychodynamics of the accused, the more we come to believe that he is a sick patient in need of treatment. The unacknowledged aim, and assuredly the practical effect, of this tactic is that the participation of persons other than the defendant in the crea-... 

---