Droplets progeny

Evaporation of Droplets Leading to Coulomb Fissions Producing Progeny Droplets that Ultimately Lead to Ions in the Gas-Phase Effects of the Concurrent Large Concentration Increase... 

It is clear that the process of repeated droplet fissions of both parent and progeny droplets ultimately will lead to very small charged droplets that are the precursors of the gas-phase ions. The mechanisms by which the gas-phase ions are produced from... 

Figure 1.5 Droplet histo of charged water droplets produced by nanospray. First droplet is one of the droplets produced at spray needle. This parent droplet is followed over three evaporation and fission events. The first generation progeny droplets are shown as well as the fission of one of the progeny droplets that leads to second-generation progeny droplets.

Z = 0.9 Zr just before the fission and Z = 0.7 Zr just after the fission (as observed in Figure 1.4), while the progeny droplets have Z = 0.7 Zr just after the fission of the parent. (Based on Figure 1.1 in Peschke, Verkerk and Kebarle [33].) it should be noted that the droplets history presented in Figure 1.6 is only a qualitative model. Thus, the assumption that only five progeny droplets could be formed at each fission is quite uncertain. The actual number could be much larger and the progeny droplets much smaller. 

Peschke et al. [33] evaluated an approximate droplet history scheme for water droplets produced by nanoelectrospray. The early part of this scheme is shown in Figure 1.5, Section 1.2.7. Because the initial droplets produced by nanospray have a small diameter (< 1 tm), their evaporation is very fast, so that they reach the Rayleigh instability condition in just a few p,s. It could also be established that the first generation progeny droplets will be the major source of analyte ions [33]. 

Because large complexes are most probably transferred to the gas phase via CRM, another question must also be examined. Considering a protein-substrate complex, and assuming close to equal concentrations of protein (P) and substrate (S), an evaluation [33] shows that, for an initial concentration of 10 pM, in most cases there will be one protein and one substrate molecule in the average first generation progeny droplet that has evaporated down to the size of the protein. In that case. 

Grimm, R.L. Beauchamp, J.L. Dynamics of Field-Induced Droplet Ionization Time-Resolved Studies of Distortion, Jetting, and Progeny Formation from Charged and Neutral Methanol Droplets Exposed to Strong Electric Fields. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,109, 8244-8250. 

Evolution of Droplets by Evaporation and Coulomb Fissions Producing Smaller and Smaller Progeny Droplets that Lead Ultimately to Minute Charged Droplets that Produce Ions in the Gas Phase... 

Figure 13. Different f(Hms of electrospray at the tip of the spray capilary. (a) Cone jet mode. Relation p between radius of droplets and radius of jet Rj /Rj 1.9. Much smaller, satellite droplets can also be [HXKluced (see small drc let in this figure). Hiese are more common at higher flow rates. In such cases, two types of monodisperse droplets are observed the large progeny droplets and the small (satellite) IHx>geny. (b), (c) Multijet modes result as the spray voltage is increased and the flow rate imposed by the syringe is high. (After Cloupeau. )...

X 10 V/m and in the second row droplets with q = 0.09qn and =2.14 X 10 V/m. In both cases these helds represent the minimum for which held-induced droplet ionization (FlDl) is observed. The jets in frames E and J demonstrate capillary instability and the formation of progeny droplets of approximately 10-pm diameter. For the q = 0.04, the time of 650 ps for jetting to begin is identical to that observed for a neutral droplet. (From Grimm and Beauchamp, with permission from the American Chemical Society.)... 

It is notable that the generation of a charged protein in the gas phase by the above model falls somewhere between the CRM and the lEM. With CRM, the protein stays in the droplet until the solvent has evaporated and the charges of the droplet land on the protein. With lEM the protein leaves the droplet before it has evaporated, whereas in the model above, the protein stimulates the release of charged progeny droplets and leaves the parent drop in the first progeny drop that is of similar size to the protein. 

---