Fusion, nuclear solar

Resource pessimists counter that this process cannot proceed forever because the eternal persistence of demand for any given commodity that is destroyed by use must inevitably lead to its depletion. I lowever, the eternal persistence assumption is not necessarily correct. The life of a solar system apparently is long but finite. Energy sources such as nuclear fusion and solar energy in time could replace more limited resources such as oil and natural gas. Already, oil, gas, nuclear power, and coal from better sources have displaced traditional sources of coal in, for example, Britain, Germany, Japan, and France. 

Solar fusion Nuclear fusion reactions are responsible for the glow and heat from stars such as the Sun. The temperature of the Sun s core Is about 15,000,000 K. It is so hot and dense that hydrogen nuclei fuse to produce helium. After billions of years, the Sun s hydrogen will be mostly depleted. Its temperature will rise to about 100,000,000 K, and the fusion process will then change helium into carbon. 

Most schemes that have been proposed to propel starships involve plasmas. Schemes differ both in the selection of matter for propulsion and the way it is energi2ed for ejection. Some proposals involve onboard storage of mass to be ejected, as in modem rockets, and others consider acquisition of matter from space or the picking up of pellets, and their momentum, which are accelerated from within the solar system (184,185). Energy acquisition from earth-based lasers also has been considered, but most interstellar propulsion ideas involve nuclear fusion energy both magnetic, ie, mirror and toroidal, and inertial, ie, laser and ion-beam, fusion schemes have been considered (186—190). 

What are the opportunities for using forms of energy that do not lead to CO2 formation Nuclear power from fission reactors presents problems with the handling and deposition of nuclear waste. Fusion reactors are more appealing, but may need several decades of further development. However, solar and wind energy offer realistic alternatives. 

The second factor relates to environmental issues. Much will depend on how dangerous will actually be global consequences of Earth pollution with mamnade extra heat, chemicals, etc., associated with traditional types of energy production. Note, that nuclear fusion, which sooner or later is anticipated to be developed, also is expected to pollute Earth with extra heat. If such pollution occurs intolerable, the development and corrunercialization of solar power pltints, which produce no extra heating of the Earth and in other respects also seem to be envirorunentally friendly, may obtain high priorities. 

At 2000 K there is sufficient energy to make the H2 molecules dissociate, breaking the chemical bond the core density is of order 1026 m-3 and the total diameter of the star is of order 200 AU or about the size of the entire solar system. The temperature rise increases the molecular dissociation, promoting electrons within the hydrogen atoms until ionisation occurs. Finally, at 106 K the bare protons are colliding with sufficient energy to induce nuclear fusion processes and the protostar develops a solar wind. The solar wind constitutes outbursts of material that shake off the dust jacket and the star begins to shine. 

Neutrino deficit Subatomic particles predicted to be released by the nuclear reactions on the Sun and should be detected on Earth. The number of neutrinos observed on Earth is much less than predicted by the models of solar nuclear fusion. 

This solar energy is the aftermath of nuclear fusion, while nuclear fission occurs in commercial nuclear reactors. Without this energy there would be no life, there would be no fossil fuels or wind or even elements in our world. 

Students often state the laws of thermodynamics this way. You cant win because you cant get any more energy out of a system than you put into it. You can t break even because no matter what you do, some of your energy will be lost as ambient heat. Lastly, you cant get out of the game because you depend on entropy-increasing processes, such as solar nuclear fusion or cellular respiration, to remain alive. 

Energy sources and conversion— biomass, batteries, fuel celts and fuel cell technology, hydrogen as a fuel, liquid and gaseous fuels from coal, oil shale, tar sands, nuclear fission and fusion, lithium lor thermonuclear reactors, insulating materials, and solar energy. 

In exploring alternatives to nuclear fission and fusion, it is particularly important to determine as quickly as possible whether a combination of solar and biomass options can provide the food, fiber, shelter, transport and other essentials for a world population that could easily reach 10 billion well before the end of the 21st century. We know enough today to explore within reasonable limits of certainty whether a totally non-nuclear economy in the post-fossil fuel era, be it high-technology or low-technology, can provide the necessities of life for this number of people. 

Never mind. In the center of the Sun is the core, the Sun s power plant in which nuclear fusion reactions turn hydrogen into helium and generate tremendous amounts of heat. Here, the gas density is more than 100 times that of water, or 14 times that of lead. In fact, the core contains 40 percent of the solar mass. 2 Sir, at that density, why isn t the core a solid ... 

On solar scales, the change is slow. It takes a billion years for only 0.01 percent of the Sun s mass to metamorphose into beautiful sunshine. The Sun s nuclear reactions are slowed because the positively charged protons repel each other. This repulsion slows down the fusion. If the rate were much quicker, the Sun would explode like a big hydrogen bomb. 

---