Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Functional Orthogonality Requirement

If there is more than one constraint, one additional multiplier term is added for each constraint. The optimization is then performed on the Lagrange function by requiring that the gradient with respect to the x- and A-variable(s) is equal to zero. In many cases the multipliers A can be given a physical interpretation at the end. In the variational treatment of an HF wave function (Section 3.3), the MO orthogonality constraints turn out to be MO energies, and the multiplier associated with normalization of the total Cl wave function (Section 4.2) becomes the total energy. [Pg.339]

The transformation T we adopt is induced by the wave function normalization condition which, in terms of the weights, reads w + W3 = 1. From (3.5), it is apparent that if T sends the vvm set into a new set wm with ivi = vvi + iv3 = 1 as one of its elements, then both the first row and the first column of the transformed polarization component of the solvent force constant matrix K, "/ = T. Kp°r. T (T = T) are zero, since the derivatives of wi are zero. Given the normalization condition and the orthogonality requirement — with the latter conserving the original gauge of the solvent coordinates framework — one can calculate T for any number of diabatic states [42], The transformation for the two state case is... [Pg.270]

The above function is a one-center correlated Gaussian with exponential coefficients forming the symmetric matrix A]. <1) are rotationally invariant functions as required by the symmetry of the problem—that is, invariant with respect to any orthogonal transformation. To show the invariance, let U be any 3x3 orthogonal matrix (any proper or improper rotation in 3-space) that is applied to rotate the r vector in the 3-D space. Prove the invariance ... [Pg.396]

Though the core expansion leads to the appropriate fit, it may not be the proper explanation for the scale factor discrepancy. Hansen et al. (1987) note that the expansion of the core would lead to a decrease of 7.5 eV in the kinetic energy of the core electrons, at variance with the HF band structure calculations of Dovesi et al. (1982), which show the decrease to be only about 1.5 eV. An alternative interpretation by von Barth and Pedroza (1985) is based on the condition of orthogonality of the core and valence wave functions. The orthogonality requirement introduces a core-like cusp in the s-like valence states, but not in the p-states. Because of the promotion of electrons from s - p in Be metal, the high-order form factor for the crystal must be lower than that for the free atom. It is this effect that can be mimicked by the apparent core expansion. [Pg.259]

In simple cases the Gl is a HLSP function while the Gf wave function is a standard tableaux function, which we describe below in Sect. 3.3. For Gf wave functions one may show that the above orthogonality requirement is not a real constraint on the energy. On the other hand, no such invariance occurs with Gl or HLSP functions, so the orthogonality constraint has a real impact on the calculated energy in this case and with all other Gi wave functions. [Pg.16]

The most common approach is to note that since the pair functions vv/ may not contain any interparticle co-ordinates (as then the strong orthogonality requirement cannot be sustained), they may be expressed as bilinear expansions in one-electron orbitals ... [Pg.100]

SC theory does not assume any orthogonality between the orbitals ij/ which, just as in the GVB-PP-SO case, are expanded in the AO basis for the whole molecule Xp P 1,2,..., M. The use of the full spin space and the absence of orthogonality requirements allow the SC wavefunction to accommodate resonance which is particularly easy to identify if 0 sm is expressed within the Rumer spin basis. In addition to the Rumer spin basis, the SC approach makes use of the Kotani spin basis, as well as of the less common Serber spin basis. When analysing the nature of the overall spin function in the SC wavefunction (3.9), it is often convenient to switch between different spin bases. The transformations between the representations of 5M in the Kotani, Rumer and Serber spin bases can be carried out in a straightforward manner with the use of a specialised code for symbolic generation and manipulation of spin eigenfunctions (SPINS, see ref. 51). [Pg.318]

The functions belonging to the set Yi(p aoi) j must fulfill definite orthogonality requirements with respect to the electronic Hamiltonian He(p, R) that must be valid for any value of R. [Pg.111]

For this study the density functional method was applied at its local approximation level. An application of the density functional to absorption and luminescence involves excited electronic states. As in any electronic structure theory, excited states are conceptually more difficult to treat than the ground state, since there is an orthogonality requirement with respect to all lower states. Despite the fact that DFT was originally designed to efficiently calculate electronic ground states, several extensions have been developed to treat excited states for a review see Jones and Gunnarsson [99]. [Pg.239]

Early applications of pseudopotentials in cluster models [62,63], which dealt with impurities in alkali halide crystals, used Hartree-Fock (HF) based model potentials [64] and complete-cation norm-conserving pseudopotentials [65]. A similar technique was found valuable to describe bulk properties of alkaline-earth oxides [66-68]. A general procedure for calculating embedded clusters under the assumption of a frozen environment and orthogonality requirements for the wave function of the cluster and the environment was also discussed... [Pg.373]

In order to be able to carry through the implementation of the solution of the SCF equations the ability to transform the equations to a basis of orthogonal functions is required. The simplest way to carry this out is the so-called symmetrical or L0wdin orthogonalisation method. [Pg.480]

In a majority of applications compactly supported wavelets (scaling functions) are required and then the above mentioned sums are finite. If we want to create an orthogonal system we require that... [Pg.218]


See other pages where Functional Orthogonality Requirement is mentioned: [Pg.458]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.1186]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.819]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.180]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.180 ]




SEARCH



Functional requirements

Orthogonal functions

Orthogonally functionalized

© 2024 chempedia.info