Full cubic model

For example, in the case of the 3 component mixture we may assume that the response is well or at least adequately modelled by a third-order polynomial. However if we are not sure of the best model, we may prefer a step-wise approach, first building up a second-order design, and then augmenting it as necessary. The possibility of such a sequential approach to experimental design is as valuable for mixtures, as it is for independent variables. Thus the ternary test point 7 is added to the 3 component second-order design (figure 9.3) and the special cubic model determined. Extra test points may be added but these points do not allow fitting of the full cubic model. 

Add further binary points to be able to use a full cubic model. 

The full cubic model for a mixture of three components is given by the equation... 

Trying to fit the usual models to the data in the table, we find that this system is more complex than the others we have seen in this chapter. All of the simpler models presented lack of fit, and only the full cubic model proved satisfactory for both responses. In terms of the original quantities, these models are given by the equations below, where only the significant terms (at the 95% confidence level) are retained. 

Fig. 7A.9. Contour curves for the two full cubic models fitted to the data of Table 7A.6.

The coefficients of the statistically significant terms of the fitted models for the five responses are given in Table 7A.8. The special cubic model is the one that best fits all properties except cohesivity, for which the quadratic model is sufficient. Of all fitted models, only that for firmness shows some lack of fit, but the number of level combinations in the design is not sufficient for fitting a full cubic model. The coefficient values clearly indicate that starch (xi) is the most important component, but its effect depends on the proportions of the other two ingredients, sugar and powdered milk. 

Statistical design of experiment (DOE) is an efficient procedure for finding the optimum molar ratio for copolymers having the best property profile. Based on the concepts of response-surface (RS) methodology, developed by Box and Wilson [11], there are four models or polynominals (Table III) useful in our study. For three components, in general, if there are seven to nine experimental data points, the linear, quadratic and special cubic will be applicable for use in predictions. If there are ten or more data points, the full cubic model will also be applicable. At the start of the effort, one prepares a fair number of copolymers with different AA IA NVP ratios and tests for a property one wishes to optimize, with the data fit to the statistical models. Based on the models, new copolymers, with different ratios, are prepared and tested for the desired property improvement. This type procedure significantly lowers the number of copolymers that needs to be prepared and evaluated, in order to identify the ratio needed to give the best mechanical property. 

FIGURE 8.8 Examples of simplex lattices for (a) linear, (b) quadratic, (c) full cubic, and (d) special cubic models. 

For tliis model tire parameter set p consists of tire rate constants and tire constant pool chemical concentrations l A, 1 (Most chemical rate laws are constmcted phenomenologically and often have cubic or otlier nonlinearities and irreversible steps. Such rate laws are reductions of tire full underlying reaction mechanism.)... 

In the remainder of this section it is desired to obtain the relative, constant-pressure heat capacity of the liquid at x=j and the concentration fluctuation factor for all compositions. Since the latter equation is complicated, it is not written out in full here. This has been done in Eqs. (37)-(45) of the paper by Liao et al. (1982) for the special case that 14 = 34 = 0 and / l3 is the only nonzero cubic interaction term, i.e., the version of the model applied here to the Ga-Sb and In-Sb binaries. Bhatia and Hargrove (1974) have given equations for the composition fluctuation factor at zero wave number for the special cases of complete association or dissociation and only quadratic interaction coefficients. 

The previous chapter has provided some indication of the behaviour which can be exhibited by the simple cubic autocatalysis model. In order to make a full analysis, it is convenient both for algebraic manipulation and as an aid to clarity to recast the rate equations in dimensionless terms. This is meant to be a painless procedure (and beloved of chemical engineers even though traditionally mistrusted by chemists). We aim wherever possible to make use of symbols which can be quickly identified with their most important constituents thus for the dimensionless concentration of A we have a, with / for the dimensionless concentration of B. Once this transformation has been achieved, we can embark on a quite detailed and comprehensive analysis of the behaviour of this prototype chemical oscillator. 

Fig. 3. Temperature variation of the cubic lattice parameter of Gdlnj measured by x-ray powder diffraction (this work). The full line corresponds to a fit of a Debye model to the whole temparature range, the dashed line shows an extrapolation from the paramagnetic range obtained from fitting the Debye function only to the data points...

The full extent and variety of the phase behavior for water-isopropanol-C02 mixtures observed experimentally and calculated with the Peng-Robinson equation of state was not anticipated based on known phase behavior for the constituent binary mixtures or similar ternary mixtures. These results suggest that multiphase behavior for related model surfactant systems could also be complex. Measurements of all the critical endpoint curves, the tricritical points, and secondary critical endpoint for such systems would be tedious and are extremely difficult. However, by coupling limited experimental data with a thermodynamic model based on this cubic equation of state, complex multiphase behavior can be comprehensively described. 

To account for this, a full-profile fit of the XRD pattern was made for three different crystallographic models (1) pure B structure (2) pure B2 structure (3) cubic structure with the fee sublattice for the lead atoms and two different positions for the sulfur atoms. The last model allows sulfur atoms to occupy not only octahedral interstitials in the fee sublattice as it is common for the B structure, but also the occupation of tetrahedral interstitials, which is common for the 53 structure. The best fit to experimental XRD pattern in the case of the third model is shown in Fig. 1. 

Figure 19 shows an example of a prediction table and a display of positions of the atoms of a test molecule in the cubic section model (col 3). The test molecule is known not to be formed by HLADH reduction (the priority number is zero). Although no forbidden cubes are occupied one occupied cube has a very low priority value, 0.24. This suggests that the test molecule would not be expected to be produced by HLADH. The cubic section map for this molecule further showed that some carbons are near to forbidden cubes. It is usually better to check all visualisation methods when using ENZYME for prediction of reactivity. In practice it is found that the full prediction table gives the most accurate prediction. 

Figure 9 shows coexistence curves for polymers of 100, 600, 1000, and 2000 sites. The lines are the results of this work, and the open symbols are simulation data from the literature [25]. For n = 100 and n = 600, our results are in good agreement with literature reports. Note, however, that with the new method, we are able to explore the phase behavior of long polymer chains down to fairly low temperatures. The computational demands of the new method are relatively modest. For example, calculation of the full phase diagram for polymer chains of length 2000 required less than 5 days on a workstation. It is important to emphasize that, for the cubic lattice model adopted here, chains of 2000 segments correspond to polystyrene solutions... 

---