Freshwater systems sampling

In freshwater and marine surface waters in Europe, concentrations of NP still exceed the PNEC of 0.33 p.gL-1 derived in the EU document cited above [10]. Whereas in several freshwater systems in NW Europe (notably The Netherlands and Germany) in the most recent sampling campaigns observed concentrations of NP tend to be below this PNEC (Chapter 6.2.1), in the Mediterranean countries concentrations well above this level can still be found. Elsewhere in the world the situation is between these two, with the highest concentrations of NPEO and NP occurring in developing countries with untreated wastewater discharged directly to surface waters. 

Environmental Pathways of Selected Chemicals in Freshwater Systems Part 1 Background and Experimental Procedures 821R98008 Evaluating Field Techniques for Collecting Effluent Samples for Trace Metals Analysis... 

The apparent differences in identified photoproducts between marine and freshwater systems may be due to fundamental differences in DOM composition (see Chapters 3 and 5) or to differences in analytical approaches (e.g., capillary electrophoresis has often been the method of choice to identify DOM photoproducts in freshwater systems, but this method is not appropriate for high-salinity marine samples Table I). The fact that most of the labile photoproducts found only in freshwater environments have been identified by more than one analytical approach, however, suggests that methods alone cannot explain the 14 nonoverlapping photoproducts. On the other hand, studies conducted by the same researcher(s) tend to report the same suite of compounds, even across marine/freshwater boundaries (e.g., Kieber et al., 1990), suggesting that optimization of the analytical approach and/or researcher focus may be influencing the data. More studies identifying DOM photoproducts have been conducted in freshwater environments than in marine environments (12 vs. 6), a factor that is also likely to influence the number of reported photoproducts. At this point, evidence is insufficient to determine whether DOM photoproducts that are currently unique to either marine or freshwater environments can be attributed to inherent DOM compositional differences or to analytical approach. 

Aside firom monitoring biomolecules in humans and animals, the microdialysis technique is also utilized in the area of environmental research. Probes are inserted into freshwater systems or soil for real-time and continuous sampling with minimum disturbance of the outer environment [3]. 

Laboratory tests should simulate the water chemistry and operating conditions of the freshwater system. A sample of water from the system may be used if it is available. Immersion testing and electrochemical testing are commonly used for laboratory tests. Laboratory tests are often used to simulate a process in order to confirm a failure mode. 

Disequilibria studies have been used to understand particle d)mamics and the fate and transport of particle-reactive systems in marine environments and in low salinity and freshwater systems. Waples et al. [99] described a procedure to measure Th/ U disequilibria to understand natural mechanisms in water systems. The main advantage of their methodology is the use of small samples and low-background gas flow proportional counters. 

Edwards, A.C., Creasey, J. and M.S.Cresser (1984). The conditions and frequency of sampling for elucidation of transport mechanisms and element budgets in upland drainage basins. In Eriksson, E. (ed.) Hydrochemical Balances of Freshwater Systems, 187-202. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publ. 150, Oxford. 

The effect of photochemical degradation of DOM in freshwater systems can also be examined with fluorescence measurements. A typical response for freshwater DOM was observed in a study by Cory et al. (2007) with whole water samples from Alaskan (USA) stream and lake water, which showed a decrease in total fluorescence by the end of the short-term (12 hours) irradiation (Figure 3.10). On irradiation different fluorophores varied with respect to their percent change of fluorescence but humic-like fluorophores (SQl and SQ2 Figure 3.9) showed the greatest loss of fluorescence intensity. Overall the proteinlike fluorophores (Tyr and Trp Figure 3.10) showed little change with irradiation and for... 

Other samples even showed a small increase, resulting in post-irradiation waters having an increased contribution of protein-like relative to humic-like components in comparison to initial waters (Cory et al., 2007). Whole water samples in freshwater systems also typically show a decrease in FI with irradiation. The variation in FI has been shown to be related to relative amounts of SQl and SQ2 in a sample and thus the decrease in H with irradiation time can be attributed to the greater loss of SQ2 in comparison to SQl in Figure 3.10 (Cory et al., 2007). Fluorescence characterization of DOM can help understand how photochemical processes influence DOM quantity and quality, and utihzing spectrophotometric techniques in comparison with other DOM characterization techniques shows promise for understanding how photochemical processes remove and modify DOM in aquatic systems (Spencer et al, 2009a Stubbins et al, 2010). 

---