Free energy relationships, classes

In a broad sense, one may include the Free-Wilson equation within the class of linear free energy relationships (LFER). It is also subjected to the assumption of additivity of the contributions to the biological activity by substituent groups at different substitution sites. The assumption requires, for example, that there is no hydrogen bonding interaction between the various substitution groups. 

Each group then rotates through all the experiments developed by the class. The course is on thermodynamics and kinetics so the assigned projects cover these topics. A typical set of projects is free energy relationships, activation energy for a reaction, calorimetry, determination of reaction order for a complex reaction, and determination of the thermodynamic parameters for a charge transfer reaction. 

There are two main problems in the use of linear-free-energy relationships The first and largest problem is the determination of the reaction series to which an unknown belongs. Such a deduction from electrochemical behavior is not straightforward Furthermore, there may be several reaction series which may be constructed for a class of compounds depending on solution conditions The slope of the E /2 vs a P -ot would be different at high pH s due to a change in the mechanism of reduction. 

Class I free energy relationships compare a rate constant with the equilibrium constant of the same process. The Bronsted and Leffler equations (see Chapter 2) are examples of this class of free energy correlation. 

The rate or equilibrium constant in Class II is related to the rate or equilibrium constant of an unconnected but (often) similar process. Class II free energy relationships are in general more common than those of Class I because equilibrium constants are more difficult to measure than rate constants (except in certain cases such as dissociation constants). The Hammett equation is the best-known Class II free energy relationship. 

The existence of Class I free energy relationships can be deduced from the energy profile of a reaction. Figure 1 illustrates what happens to the profile as a substituent is changed. We shall assume that the reaction (Equation 6) consists of a single bond fission (A-B -> B -t- A)... 

Integration and rearrangement of this equation gives rise to the Class I free energy relationship (Equation 9). ... 

The origins of the Class II free energy relationships are not so easy to visualise as those of Class I in terms of a molecular model, because there is no direct atomic interaction between the systems giving rise to the two free energy changes (as in Figure 1). In this case it is necessary to invoke chemical intuition to indicate that substituent effects on chemically similar processes will be related to each other. No such assumption is necessary in the Class I case. 

Taft s polar substituent constant, a, applicable to aliphatic systems is based on the notion that free energy relationships can exist between rate processes as well as between rate and equilibrium processes (Equations 3-5, Chapter 1). A rate process can thus be employed as a reference reaction. A simple example of such a Class II rate-rate free energy relationship is shown in Figure 3 where the reaction of phenoxide ion with 4-nitrophenyl-substituted benzoate esters is compared with the corresponding reaction of hydroxide ion, which therefore becomes the reference free energy change. 

The Bronsted equation is a Class I free energy relationship and this may be shown by considering as an example the acid-catalysed dehydration of acetaldehyde hydrate (Equation 30). This reaction also provides a good example of an acid-catalysed reaction following a Bronsted equation (Figure 7). 

This approach is a mathematical alternative to the qualitative arguments given in Chapter 1 and in Appendix 1 (Sections Al.1.2 and Al.1.3) for the deduction of Class I free energy relationships and the variation of the selectivity coefficient, a, with ACq. 

These arguments do not invalidate the immense array of linear free energy relationships gathered over the past 70 years or so. Class II systems such as Hammett or Taft relationships can be excluded from these considerations because the two variables are independent. The following arguments can be employed to demonstrate experimentally that a Class I correlation such as a Bronsted or a Leffler Equation does not arise from a statistical artifact in a system under investigation. Rearranging the Leffler Equation (Equation 27) yields Equation (29). 

The similarity coefficient of Hammett and other Class II free energy correlations often bears no direct relationship to the transition structure because of dissimilarity between the model equilibrium and the reaction being studied. The closer the model is to the reaction under investigation the more reliable is any mechanistic conclusion from the value of the similarity coefficient. Some representative free energy relationships and their similarity coefficients are collected in Appendix 4. 

Numerous relationships exist among the structural characteristics, physicochemical properties, and/or biological qualities of classes of related compounds. Simple examples include bivariate correlations between physicochemical properties such as aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficients (Jtow) and correlations between equilibrium constants of related sets of compounds. Perhaps the best-known attribute relationships to chemists are the correlations between reaction rate constants and equilibrium constants for related reactions commonly known as linear free-energy relationships or LFERs. The LFER concept also leads to the broader concepts of property-activity and structure-activity relationships (PARs and SARs), which seek to predict the environmental fate of related compounds or their bioactivity (bioaccumulation, biodegradation, toxicity) based on correlations with physicochemical properties or structural features of the compounds. Table 1 summarizes the types of attribute relationships that have been used in chemical fate studies and defines some important terms used in these relationships. 

As reaction rates are often expressed in a modified Arrhenius form, simple approaches like those based on linear free energy relationships, such as Evans-Polanyi, are adopted (Susnow et al., 1997). Automatic generators usually refer to thermochemical kinetics methods (Benson, 1976) and the kinetic parameters rely on a limited number of reference rate constants and are extended to all the reactions of specific classes adopting analogy rules (Battin-LeClerc et al., 2000 Ranzi et al., 1995). Recently, extensive adoption of ab initio calculations of activation energies and reaction rates are adopted (Saeys et al., 2003, 2004, 2006). 

In fact, several well known models in the literature allow solubilities in water to be estimated reasonably well from a knowledge of log P (and according to the functional groups present). For example, Hansch et al. (1968) has published several linear free energy relationships (LFERs) between molal solubility and log P for various classes of monofunctional molecules. The correlation coefficients for the LFERs (a measure of goodness of fit ) were in the range 0.93-0.99, indicating that solubility estimations, at least for some classes of material, are likely to be relatively accurate. 

The Hammett-type correlation for the rate constants of 5-allyl-5-R-barbiturates has been reported by Carstensen et al. and suggested for use in stability predictions.569 Similar correlations were also found for the hydrolysis of 5-arylidenebarbituric acids.363,567 Linear free energy relationships have also been reported for dissociation constants,45,51 polarographic half-wave potentials,570 fluorescence70 and luminescence phenomena,71 and 13C-NMR chemical shifts129 for different classes of barbituric acid derivatives. Application of the dual substituent parameters method in LFER analysis of barbiturates, using Taft s polar and steric constants for various chemical and physicochemical properties, was also evaluated.571... 

Estimation methods for the hydrolysis rates of several types of carboxylic acid esters, carbamates, aromatic nitriles and phosphoric acid esters have been reported. Hydrolysis rates are subject to substituent effects, and consequently linear free-energy relationships (LFERs), as represented by Hammett or Taft correlations, have hence been applied to their estimations. Reviews (e.g. Harris, 1990 Peijnenburg, 1991) reveal that QSARs are available for only a few compound classes (Table 4.8) and are mostly based on limited sets of experimental data. 

In conclusion, it can be said that the outstanding sensitivity of the spectral absorption and chemical reactivity of our pyridinium-N-phenoxide betaine dyes to small changes in solvent, temperature, pressure, and substituents makes these dyes a very useful class of compounds. They are not only solvatochromic compounds, but exhibit also the phenomena of thermo and piezo-solvatochromism. Their use for setting up different reaction series in order to get Linear Free-Energy Relationships has been demonstrated by the fact that the same betaine dye can be used not only for the introduction of a spectroscopic solvent polarity scale, the so-called E i-scale, but also for the establishment of kinetic and spectroscopic scales of substituents. 

Nucleophilic substitution reactions are one of the most important classes of reactions in organic chemistry. In particular, 8 2 reactions are among the most extensively stndied chemical processes in solution and in the gas phase, both theoretically and experimentally. The history of the study of these reactions closely parallels (and is sometimes responsible for) the development of concepts such as structure-reactivity relationships, linear free-energy relationships, steric inhibition, kinetics as a probe of mechanism, stereochemistry as a probe of mechanism and solvent effects. 

Iwamura(51) has investigated the structure-sweetness relationship in four classes of L-aspartyl dipeptides using linear free energy descriptors and multi-dimensional regression analysis. In essence, the Hansch methodology was employed. The four classes of compounds are - ... 

The Peng-Roblnson EOS was recently found to yield the best values of binary critical volumes for class 1 systems and to perform reliably for other critical properties as well (13). The expression of A in terms of T, V, and x along with the relationships between second and third derivatives of Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies are given by Peng and Robinson (11). 

The similarity coefficient 6z in the free energy equation (Equation 2) compares the change in the process under investigation (the unknown system) with that for a standard or reference (the known) system. The coefficient measures the similarity between the two systems. In the case of Class I relationships the similarity coefficient measures the extent to which the transition state resembles the products compared with the reactants. The similarity coefficient for Class II systems measures the extent to which conversion to the transition state resembles the conversion of reactants into products in the standard or reference system. 

---