Free-electron theory condensation

Mott originally considered an array of monovalent metal ions on a lattice, in which the interatomic distance, d, may be varied. Very small interatomic separations correspond to the condensed crystalline phase. Because the free-electron-Uke bands are half-filled in the case of ions with a single valence electron, one-electron band theory predicts metallic behavior. However, it predicts that the array will be metallic, regardless of the interatomic separation. Clearly, this can t be true given that, in the opposite extreme, isolated atoms are electrically insulating. 

These three examples reflect various aspects of quantum electrodynamics theory. The electron anomalous magnetic moment follows from free-electron QED, the transition frequencies in hydrogen follow from bound-state QED, and, at least in principle, the relevant condensed matter theory follows from the equations of many-body QED. 

Band theory provides a picture of electron distribution in crystalline solids. The theory is based on nearly-free-electron models, which distinguish between conductors, insulators and semi-conductors. These models have much in common with the description of electrons confined in compressed atoms. The distinction between different types of condensed matter could, in principle, therefore also be related to quantum potential. This conjecture has never been followed up by theoretical analysis, and further discussion, which follows, is purely speculative. 

The basis of the theory is that free charges exist to some extent in any condensed material, even in the best dielectrics, and there will always be an electrochemical potential difference across the interface between two materials in contact, e.g., adhesive and substrate. Free electronic or ionic charge carriers will tend to move across the contact interface, and an electric double layer is established. This mechanism is considered quite distinct from any charge transfer, which may be associated with bonding at the interface, as discussed inO Sect. 2.1.1 above. 

The development of the effective Hamiltonian has been due to many authors. In condensed phase electron spin magnetic resonance the so-called spin Hamiltonian [20,21] is an example of an effective Hamiltonian, as is the nuclear spin Hamiltonian [22] used in liquid phase nuclear magnetic resonance. In gas phase studies, the first investigation of a free radical by microwave spectroscopy [23] introduced the ideas of the effective Hamiltonian, as also did the first microwave magnetic resonance study [24], Miller [25] was one of the first to develop the more formal aspects of the subject, particularly so far as gas phase studies are concerned, and Carrington, Levy and Miller [26] have reviewed the theory of microwave magnetic resonance, and the use of the effective Hamiltonian. 

Developments in experimental and computational science have shed light on phenomena in bioenvironments and condensed phases that pose significant challenges for theoretical models of solvation [27]. Tapia [22] raises the important distinction between solvation theory and solvent effects theory. Solvation theory is concerned with direct evaluation of solvation free energies this is extensively covered by recent reviews [16,17]. Solvent-effect theory concerns changes induced by the medium onto electronic structure and molecular properties of the solute. Solvent-effect theory is concerned with molecular properties of the solvated molecule relative to the properties in vacuo as such it focuses on chemical features suitable for studying systems at the microscopic level [23]. Extensive reviews of different computational methods are given in a book by Warshel [24]. 

The CT/ET free energy surface is the central concept in the theory of CT/ ET reactions. The surface s main purpose is to reduce the many-body problem of a localized electron in a condensed-phase environment to a few collective reaction coordinates affecting the electronic energy levels. This idea is based on the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) separation " of the electronic and nuclear time scales, which in turn makes the nuclear dynamics responsible for fluctuations of electronic energy levels (Eigure 1). The choice of a particular collective mode is dictated by the problem considered. One reaction coordinate stands out above all others, however, and is the energy gap between the two CT states as probed by optical spectroscopy (i.e., an experimental observable). 

The azide procedure for peptide synthesis and particularly for fragment condensations is considered to be a mainly racemization free method. This low racemization tendency of azides was explained by several theories, which have been reviewed.t l The most plausible cause of racemization is the formation of oxazoles (Scheme 3) and the related enolization. In presence of bases the a-carbon proton is readily abstracted to form an anionic oxazol-5(4//)-one resonance system.For the formation of the oxazol-5(4//)-one the influence of the substituent Y on the a-carbonyl is essential. Since the a-carbonyl group of amino acid azides are less activated and thus relatively insensitive to oxygen containing nucleophiles such as water and alcohols, oxazol-5(4//)-one formation is largely prevented. It was proposed that the soft electron shell of the azide shields the a-carbonyl atom, so that only strong nucleophiles can attack it.t 1 The reactivity towards amines can be explained in a manner analogous to the aminolysis of anchimerically assisted active esters.h 1... 

Even if we do accept the simple Bohr theory of valence, there is still the difficulty of how to handle chemical valence when the aufbau principle breaks down for free atoms, or when the n and l of individual electrons are poorly defined. In some cases, instabilities of valence can be expected. Nonintegral valences are indeed observed for many elements of the long periods in the condensed phase. This aspect of chemical valence will be further discussed in chapter 11, where it will also be related to properties of the radial equation. 

---