Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fractionation class

A necessary restriction in the linear programming input is the requirement that the volume fractions of the final blend components add up to 1.0. Other helpful restrictions are that minimum amounts of given solvents be present in the formulation, or conversely, that upper limits be set on the concentrations of given solvents. A Rule 66-type formulation could be handled in this manner, but a more satisfactory manner is to use three equations placing maximum restrictions on the three classes as specified by the Rule. For example, Class I solvents must be less than 0.05 volume fraction, Class II solvents must be less than 0.08 volume fraction, and the sum of the three classes must be less than 0.20 volume fraction. As Nelson (I) discussed, the viscosity may be controlled although we have not found this to be a significant factor, and we often omit the specification. In this case the logarithms of the viscosities of the... [Pg.60]

Let s consider the change of compositions of three-component ideal mixture products in the concentration triangle (Fig. 2.7) under the same conditions as before for the binary one. With the increase of R in the first fractionation class, points xd and xb are moving in opposite directions and transferred along the straight line passing through the vapor-liquid feed tie-line xp yp (Rg- 2.7a). The zones of constant concentrations of the column are in the feed cross-section (Fig. 2.8a). [Pg.31]

In the case of = R3 (boundary mode of the first fractionation class), point Xd reaches side 1-2. At this time, the trajectory of distillation of the rectifying section (Fig. 2.7a) is situated along side 1-2 from point xd up to the tear off point X, and later it comes inside the concentration triangle up to point Xi Under these conditions, the trajectory of the stripping section is located completely inside the concentration triangle. The zones of constant concentrations of the column are given in Fig. 2.8b. [Pg.31]

In the case of further R increase (the second fractionation class), point xz) is traveling along side 1-2 toward vertex 1 and reaches its limiting position xd(S) at fixed D/F parameter, when R = = Rs (boundary mode of the second frac-... [Pg.32]

In the case of further R increase (the third fractionation class), the compositions xd and Xg do not change and the tear-off points x and x travel along sides 1-2 and 2-3 toward vertex 2 until they join in this vertex (Fig. 2.7c) atR = Rt = oo. [Pg.32]

Under the conditions of the second fractionation class, the compositions of products change, but the composition on the feed cross-section differs from the composition of the feed. [Pg.32]

Generally speaking, for the first and second fractionation classes under the minimum reflux mode, the points of compositions in the zones of constant concentrations (i.e., stationary points of the trajectory bundles) should be arranged at the trajectories of reversible distillation built for the product points. It follows from the conditions of the material balance and the phase equilibrium in the zones of constant concentrations. Figure 2.11b illustrates the partially reversible process (it is reversible in the colunm parts that are from the constant concentration zones for the minimum reflux mode up to the column ends). [Pg.34]

Where are the product points located in the first fractionation class ... [Pg.39]

Conversion (upgrading) of bitumen and heavy oils to distillate products requires reduction of the MW and boiling point of the components of the feedstocks. The chemistry of this transformation to lighter products is extremely complex, partly because the petroleum feedstocks are complicated mixtures of hydrocarbons, consisting of 10 to 10 different molecules. Any structural information regarding the chemical nature of these materials would help to understand the chemistry of the process and, hence, it would be possible to improve process yields and product quality. However, because of the complexity of the mixture, the characterization of entire petroleum feedstocks and products is difficult, if not impossible. One way to simpHfy this molecular variety is to separate the feedstocks and products into different fractions (classes of components) by distillation, solubility/insolubility, and adsorption/desorption techniques. For bitumen and heavy oils, there are a number of methods that have been developed based on solubility and adsorption. The most common standard method used in the petroleum industry for separation of heavy oils into compound classes is SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes) analysis. Typical SARA analyses and properties for Athabasca and Cold Lake bitumens, achieved using a modified SARA method, are shown in Table 1. For comparison, SARA analysis of Athabasca bitumen by the standard ASTM method is also shown in this table. The discrepancy in the results between the standard and modified ASTM methods is a result of the aromatics being eluted with a... [Pg.150]

In order to simplify the analysis of petroleum and its fractions, other preliminary separation techniques are employed, aiming generally to separate certain classes of components. [Pg.24]

This rarity value is equated with the fraction of hits that would be returned by searching large database of diverse molecules with the full pharmacophore (all K features) or thi subset (with K—1 features) as appropriate. Labelling this fraction of hits as p(x) we nov define q x) as the fraction of the M active molecules (i.e. the molecules originally suppliet as input to the procedure) which match each of the K + possible classes. The overal configuration is scored using ... [Pg.673]

Steroids are another class of natural products with multiple chirality centers One such compound is cholic acid which can be obtained from bile Its structural formula IS given m Figure 7 12 Cholic acid has 11 chirality centers and so a total (including cholic acid) of 2" or 2048 stereoisomers have this constitution Of these 2048 stereoiso mers how many are diastereomers of cholic acid s Remember Diastereomers are stereoisomers that are not enantiomers and any object can have only one mirror image Therefore of the 2048 stereoisomers one is cholic acid one is its enantiomer and the other 2046 are diastereomers of cholic acid Only a small fraction of these compounds are known and (+) cholic acid is the only one ever isolated from natural sources... [Pg.306]

Throughout this discussion we have used the numerical fraction of molecules in a class as the weighting factor for that portion of the population. This restriction is not necessary some other weighting factor could be used equally well. As a matter of fact, one important type of average encountered in polymer chemistry is the case where the mass fraction of the ith component is used as the weighting factor. Defining the mass of material in the ith class as mj, we write... [Pg.37]

In this context the repeat units in a polymer may be divided into two classes those at the ends of the chain (subscript e) and the others which we view as being in the middle (subscript m) of the chain. The mole fraction of each category in a sample is Xg and x j, respectively. Since all segments are of one type or the other. [Pg.217]

Column 9. Aj/Aj j gives that fraction of the area under the entire curve which has accumulated up to the Nth class. Since the curve is a weight distribution, this is equal to the weight fraction of material in the sample having M < Mj. [Pg.646]

Fig. 2. The plot of total reduced iron, Fe, and oxidized iron, Fe, normalized to Si abundance shows how the chondrite classes fall into groups distinguished by oxidation state and total Fe Si ratio. The soHd diagonal lines delineate compositions having constant total Fe Si ratios of 0.6 and 0.8. The fractionation of total Fe Si is likely the result of the relative efficiencies of accumulation of metal and siUcate materials into the meteorite parent bodies. The variation in oxidation state is the result of conditions in the solar nebula when the soHds last reacted with gas. Terms are defined in Table 1 (3). Fig. 2. The plot of total reduced iron, Fe, and oxidized iron, Fe, normalized to Si abundance shows how the chondrite classes fall into groups distinguished by oxidation state and total Fe Si ratio. The soHd diagonal lines delineate compositions having constant total Fe Si ratios of 0.6 and 0.8. The fractionation of total Fe Si is likely the result of the relative efficiencies of accumulation of metal and siUcate materials into the meteorite parent bodies. The variation in oxidation state is the result of conditions in the solar nebula when the soHds last reacted with gas. Terms are defined in Table 1 (3).
Eig. 4. The bulk oxygen isotopic composition of different meteorite classes where (—) is the terrestial fractionation line. The 5 notation refers to the normalized difference between or ratios to those in standard mean ocean water (SMOW) in relative units of parts per thousand. The... [Pg.98]

The principal class of reactions in the FCC process converts high boiling, low octane normal paraffins to lower boiling, higher octane olefins, naphthenes (cycloparaffins), and aromatics. FCC naphtha is almost always fractionated into two or three streams. Typical properties are shown in Table 5. Properties of specific streams depend on the catalyst, design and operating conditions of the unit, and the cmde properties. [Pg.184]


See other pages where Fractionation class is mentioned: [Pg.58]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.1430]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.1430]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.445]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.282 ]




SEARCH



Chemical class fractionation

Compound class fractionation

Compound class fractionation method

Compound class fractions

Fractionation first class

Fractionation into Main Lipid Classes

Fractionation of Pure Compound Classes

Fractionation second class

Fractionation third class

Lipid classes, fractionation

Minimum Reflux Mode Fractionation Classes

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons class fractionation

© 2024 chempedia.info