Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fractionation third class

The third class of lipids found in stratum corneum extracts is represented by cholesterol and cholesteryl esters. The actual role of cholesterol remains enigmatic, and no clear reason for its role in the barrier function has been proposed so far. However, it is possible that contrary to what is the role in cell membranes where cholesterol increases close packing of phospholipids, it can act as kind of a detergent in lipid bilayers of long-chain, saturated lipids.30,31 This would allow some fraction of the barrier to be in a liquid crystalline state, hence water permeable in spite of the fact that not only ceramides, but also fatty acids found in the barrier are saturated, long-chain species.28,32... [Pg.15]

Here B, C, D, and so forth, are the second, third, fouith, and so forth, virial coefficients, which in a pure fluid are only a function of temperature, and in a mixture are functions of only temperature and mole fraction. Another class of commonly used equations of state is based on the van der Waals equation. One member of this class is the Peng-Robinson (1976) equation... [Pg.7]

Figure 2.6. Operating lines for (a) first and (b) third class of fractionation forgiven feedx . R(, > R > R4 > R3 > Ri > R, splits xb(V) ati i,... Figure 2.6. Operating lines for (a) first and (b) third class of fractionation forgiven feedx . R(, > R > R4 > R3 > Ri > R, splits xb(V) ati i,...
Figure 2.7. A location of product points and trajectories under minimum reflux for given three-component feed xp (a) first class of fractionation, (b) second class of fractionation, (c) third class of fractionation. Ri < R2 < R3 < R4 < Rs < Re < = 00 sphts xo(i) xb(i) at Ri, xo(2) xb(2) aiR2,XD(i)-XB(3) atiis = 7, x i(4) xb(4) at R4, xd(5) xb(S) at R = at R(, and R-j = 00, x and xl — tear-off points of rectifying and stripping section trajectories. Figure 2.7. A location of product points and trajectories under minimum reflux for given three-component feed xp (a) first class of fractionation, (b) second class of fractionation, (c) third class of fractionation. Ri < R2 < R3 < R4 < Rs < Re < = 00 sphts xo(i) xb(i) at Ri, xo(2) xb(2) aiR2,XD(i)-XB(3) atiis = 7, x i(4) xb(4) at R4, xd(5) xb(S) at R = at R(, and R-j = 00, x and xl — tear-off points of rectifying and stripping section trajectories.
With further increase of R, we immediately pass to the third class of fractionation. For binary mixtures, the second class of fractionation is unavailable. The third class of fractionation is characterized by the fact that, in the case of R increase, the compositions of the separation products are not changed and the areas of constant concentrations in feed cross-section disappear (Fig. 2.6b). In the case of R changing, the compositions on the trays will change as well (in Fig. 2.6b, R(i = 00, R(i > R5 > R4 > R3). [Pg.30]

We have come to an important result the product compositions under infinite reflux and under a significantly large finite reflux (the third class of fractionation) are identical. [Pg.30]

For mixtures with n > 3 side by side with the first and third classes of fractionation, an intermediate class - the second class - exists. [Pg.31]

In the majority of cases, the product compositions under the infinite reflux coincide with the compositions of the product under a mode on the verge of the second and the third classes of fractionation. [Pg.32]

The mode of infinite refiux is interesting for us not only as one of limit distillation conditions, but also mainly as a mode to which splits achievable in real columns at finite but quite big refiux correspond. These splits are ones of distillation for border mode between the second and third classes of fractioning. [Pg.41]

At D = Dpr and at i = R in both sections, there are two zones of constant concentrations - in the feed point Xf and in the trajectory tear-off points of sections x from the boundary elements of concentration simplex. For a three-component mixture there is a transition from the first class of fractioning right away into the third class, omitting the second class. At further increase of reflux number, the product compositions do not change any more. [Pg.118]

At further increase of R at direct separation, top product point xd begins to move along side 1-2 to vertex 1 till component 1 will be completely in top product. After that, further movement of product points xd and xb is stopped (i.e., the third class of fractioning ensues). At indirect separation, bottom product point Xb moves to vertex 3 till component 3 will be entirely in bottom product. At the second class of fractioning, trajectory tear-off point x of one of the sections is not changed and, for mixtures with constant relative volatilities, part of trajectory of this section x s S Ai+ is also not changed (Stichlmair et al., 1993). [Pg.118]

Some interesting points can be made from Figure 6.3, for which the data of Docherty et al. (17) have been used and which shows the plot of the contributions of various excited states in the sum over states indicated in equation 7 to P ec for 4-amino-4 -nitro-frans-stilbene. First, most of the nonlinearity occurs because of the charge-transfer resonance associated with the lowest optical transition in the molecule. Second, the seventh excited state drastically reduces the nonlinearity of the molecule. Careful examination of the matrix elements is required to determine whether this reduction is caused by reverse charge transfer or by an unfavorable transition moment between two of the low-lying excited states. Third, the calculation converges with inclusion of only a fraction of the total number of excited states included in the calculation. Judicious use of the last observation could save tremendous amounts of computer time in evaluating classes of similar molecules. [Pg.304]

A second approach uses the unimodal model-independent method, which begins with the assumption that the size distribution consists of a finite number of fixed size classes. The detector response expected for this distribution is simulated, and then the weight fractions in each size class are optimized through a minimization of the sum of squared deviations from the measured and simulated detector responses. The third system uses the multimodal model-independent method. For this, diffraction patterns for known size distributions are simulated, random noise is superimposed on the patterns, and then the expected element responses for the detector configuration are calculated. The patterns are inverted by the same minimization algorithm, and these inverted patterns are compared with known distributions to check for qualitative correctness. [Pg.77]

The tocols (tocopherols and tocotrienols) are the most important class of natural antioxidants present in the unsaponifiable fraction of oils. Refining of the crude oil reduces the tocol level by about one third depending on process conditions... [Pg.178]

Figures 2-6 present some important results from the models by Leya et al. (2000a) and Masarik et al. (2001). Figure 2 shows that both models do reproduce the measured Ne depth profile in Knyahinya well, and hence can be expected to reliably predict nuclide production in meteorites of a wide range of sizes. Remarkably, secondary neutrons contribute about two thirds to the total Ne production at the surface and this fraction increases to 85% near the center. This illustrates the importance of reliable neutron cross section data. Figures 3 and 4 show the He and Ne production rates, respectively, in the two most abundant meteorite classes, the H and L chondrites, as a function of depth and size. As noted above, for average-sized meteorites (R < 40 cm), production rates vary within only about a factor of 1.5. On the other hand, for the Gold Basin chondrite with its preatmospheric radius of perhaps 3 m, nuclide concentrations vary by more than an order of magnitude (Kring et al. 2001 Wieler et al. 2000b). This meteorite is almost represented by the lines denoting an infinite radius (2ti). Figures 2-6 present some important results from the models by Leya et al. (2000a) and Masarik et al. (2001). Figure 2 shows that both models do reproduce the measured Ne depth profile in Knyahinya well, and hence can be expected to reliably predict nuclide production in meteorites of a wide range of sizes. Remarkably, secondary neutrons contribute about two thirds to the total Ne production at the surface and this fraction increases to 85% near the center. This illustrates the importance of reliable neutron cross section data. Figures 3 and 4 show the He and Ne production rates, respectively, in the two most abundant meteorite classes, the H and L chondrites, as a function of depth and size. As noted above, for average-sized meteorites (R < 40 cm), production rates vary within only about a factor of 1.5. On the other hand, for the Gold Basin chondrite with its preatmospheric radius of perhaps 3 m, nuclide concentrations vary by more than an order of magnitude (Kring et al. 2001 Wieler et al. 2000b). This meteorite is almost represented by the lines denoting an infinite radius (2ti).
Approximately two-thirds of soil organic matter can be accounted for in the humified fraction, whereas the remaining exists in the nonhumified fraction. These two classes of compounds are not easily separated from one another, as some of the nonhumic materials such as carbohydrates may be covalently bound to the humic matter (Stevenson, 1986). Chemical characteristics of nonhumic and humic substances have been discussed in Section 5.4.3. In this section, the role and function of soil humus in biogeochemical cycling will be discussed. [Pg.179]


See other pages where Fractionation third class is mentioned: [Pg.421]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.909]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.990]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.774]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.177]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 , Pg.30 ]




SEARCH



Fractionation class

© 2024 chempedia.info