Fourier transform instruments, limitations

Expensive and complex instrumentation. Moderate to poor sensitivity with continuous wave (scanning) instruments, but greatly enhanced by Fourier transform instruments. Limited range of solvents for studying proton spectra unless they are deuterated. 

It s more likely these days that you will be using a 250 or 400 MHz Fourier transform instrument with multi-nuclei capability. If such an instrument is operating in walk up mode so that it can acquire >60 samples in a working day, then it will probably be limited to about 32 scans per sample (a handy number - traditionally, the number of scans acquired has always been a multiple of eight but we won t go into the reasons here. If you want more information, take a look at the term phase cycling in one of the excellent texts available on the more technical aspects of NMR). This means that for straightforward... 

The use of hber optics and hber-optic multiplexing can increase the number of analysis points, and hence can reduce the overall costs related to a single analyzer. This approach has been used successfully with NIR instrumentation, where typically up to eight points can be handled. As noted earlier, the use of hber optics with IR Fourier transform instruments has in the past been limited. New hber materials with improved optical throughput are available, and also with the considered use of IR lasers, the role of hbers for IR applications is expected to increase. Although in the past commercial multiplexers have been available for mid-lR hber systems, their use has not been widespread. 

Fourier-transform instruments, the two techniques are sufficiently different to be valuable complements to each other. In many cases, in particular when dealing with complex molecules, such as polysaccharides, the amount of information obtainable from H-n.m.r. spectra is limited, compared to that revealed3 by 13C-n.m.r. spectra. Monosaccharides may also yield H-n.m.r. spectra that are poorly resolved, even at high field, and that contain little information. On the other hand, proton-decoupled,, 3C-n.m.r. spectra are well resolved and, even if the signals are not assigned, a spectrum will provide an almost unambiguous identification of a compound. 

Teresa Iwasita and F. C. Nart provide a valuable perspective on the foundations, capabilities, and limitations of in-situ infrared external reflection spectroscopy of electrode surfaces, with emphasis on Fourier Transform instruments. In addition to the description of underlying principles and instrumentation, selected examples are given of the monitoring and interpretation of spectra of various species adsorbed at electrochemical interfaces. 

The use of Fourier Transform instruments eliminates much of the limitations of the EMIRS, since no more potential modulation is needed. The signal-to-noise ratio is far less than the dispersive instrument and can be improved statistically by adding more scans, since the spectral acquisition time is much lower. With the Fourier Transform equipment, also the irreversible processes can be studied, since it is no longer required to return to the same potentials as for modulation (see Sect. 3.4.4). This not only allows the acquisition of derivative or bipolar bands but also the acquisition of integral bands, as in the case of the adsorbed CO on platinum electrodes [20-25], which was impossible with EMIRS. The speed of spectral acquisition of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) instruments allows also the follow-up of a reaction during a dynamic polarization curve [26, 27]. 

The multiplex advantage is important enough so that nearly all infrared spectrometers are now of the Fourier transform type Fourier transform instruments are much less common for the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared regions, however, because signal-to-noise limitations for spectral measurements with these types of radiation are seldom a result of detector noise but instead are due to shot noise and flicker noise associated with the source. In contrast to detector noise, the magnitudes of both shot and flicker noise increase as the radiant power of the signal increases. Furthermore, the total noise for all of the resolution elements in a Fourier transform measurement tends to be averaeed... 

Dispersive elements and interferometers are widely used in vibrational microspectroscopy. As in bulk measurements, microscopic Raman studies are carried out with grating monochromators, spectrographs, or Fourier transform spectrometers, although Fourier transform instruments are usually limited to applications in the near-infrared spectral region. Infrared microspectroscopy, by contrast, is almost exclusively a Fourier transform technique. 

Identification of unknowns using GC/MS is greatly simplified if accurate mass measurements are made of all the ions in a spectrum so that reasonable elemental compositions of each ion are available. Unfortunately, obtaining a mass measurement that is accurate enough to significantly limit the number of possible elemental compositions requires expensive instrumentation such as a double-focusing magnetic sector or fourier transform ICR MS. 

Most chemists tend to think of infrared (IR) spectroscopy as the only form of vibrational analysis for a molecular entity. In this framework, IR is typically used as an identification assay for various intermediates and final bulk drug products, and also as a quantitative technique for solution-phase studies. Full vibrational analysis of a molecule must also include Raman spectroscopy. Although IR and Raman spectroscopy are complementary techniques, widespread use of the Raman technique in pharmaceutical investigations has been limited. Before the advent of Fourier transform techniques and lasers, experimental difficulties limited the use of Raman spectroscopy. Over the last 20 years a renaissance of the Raman technique has been seen, however, due mainly to instrumentation development. 

Suppose that a pulse Fourier transform proton NMR experiment is carried out on a sample containing acetone and ethanol. If the instrument is correctly operated and the Bq field perfectly uniform, then the result will he a spectrum in which each of the lines has a Lorentzian shape, with a width given hy the natural limit 1/(7tT2). Unfortunately such a result is an unattainable ideal the most that any experimenter can hope for is to shim the field sufficiently well that the sample experiences only a narrow distribution of Bq fields. The effect of the Bq inhomogeneity is to superimpose an instrumental lineshape on the natural lineshapes of the different resonances the true spectrum is convoluted by the instrumental lineshape. 

Brief reflection on the sampling theorem (Chapter 1, Section IV.C) with the aid of the Fourier transform directory (Chapter 1, Fig. 2) leads to the conclusion that the Rayleigh distance is precisely two times the Nyquist interval. We may therefore easily specify the sample density required to recover all the information in a spectrum obtained from a band-limiting instrument with a sine-squared spread function evenly spaced samples must be selected so that four data points would cover the interval between the first zeros on either side of the spread function s central maximum. In practice, it is often advantageous to place samples somewhat closer together. 

The wavelengths of IR absorption bands are characteristic of specific types of chemical bonds. In the past infrared had little application in protein analysis due to instrumentation and interpretation limitations. The development of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FUR) makes it possible to characterize proteins using IR techniques (Surewicz et al. 1993). Several IR absorption regions are important for protein analysis. The amide I groups in proteins have a vibration absorption frequency of 1630-1670 cm. Secondary structures of proteins such as alpha(a)-helix and beta(P)-sheet have amide absorptions of 1645-1660 cm-1 and 1665-1680 cm, respectively. Random coil has absorptions in the range of 1660-1670 cm These characterization criteria come from studies of model polypeptides with known secondary structures. Thus, FTIR is useful in conformational analysis of peptides and proteins (Arrondo et al. 1993). 

---