Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Method four-phase

Solid phase peptide synthesis does not solve all purification problems however Even if every coupling step m the ribonuclease synthesis proceeded in 99% yield the product would be contaminated with many different peptides containing 123 ammo acids 122 ammo acids and so on Thus Memfield and Gutte s six weeks of synthesis was fol lowed by four months spent m purifying the final product The technique has since been refined to the point that yields at the 99% level and greater are achieved with current instrumentation and thousands of peptides and peptide analogs have been prepared by the solid phase method... [Pg.1142]

When a diffracted X-ray beam hits a data collection device, only the intensity of the reflection is recorded. The other vital piece of information is the phase of the reflected X-ray beam. It is the combination of the intensity and the phase of the reflections that is needed to unravel the contributions made to the diffraction by the electrons in different parts of the molecule in the crystal. This so-called phase problem has been a challenge for theoretical crystallographers for many decades. For practical crystallography, there are four main methods for phasing the data generated from a particular crystal. [Pg.282]

Techniques of emulsification of pharmaceutical products have been reviewed by Block [27]. The location of the emulsifier, the method of incorporation of the phases, the rates of addition, the temperature of each phase, and the rate of cooling after mixing of the phases considerably affect the droplet size distribution, viscosity, and stability of the final emulsion. Roughly four emulsification methods can be distinguished ... [Pg.270]

Four different methods (vapour-phase acetylation using acetic anhydride, acetylation using ketene gas, liquid phase acetylation using acetic anhydride/xylene, or neat acetic anhydride) were used to acetylate pine wood chips to a variety of WPGs for the production of MUF-bonded particleboards (Nilsson etal., 1988). Composite boards were exposed to unsterile soil in fungal cellar tests. Boards made from ketene acetylated chips were not found to be resistant to decay at the maximum WPG level achieved (17 %) with a liquid acetic anhydride modification, no decay was recorded at a WPG level of c. 18 % after 12 months exposure, whereas with a vapour-phase treatment at the same WPG, evidence for decay was found. [Pg.84]

The four common methods of crystallization travel through the phase diagram, each via a different route (dashed lines). Batch crystallization... [Pg.46]

Four main methods have been used to bring mercury into the vapour phase ... [Pg.151]

The statistical thermodynamic method discussed here provides a bridge between the molecular crystal structures of Chapter 2 and the macroscopic thermodynamic properties of Chapter 4. It also affords a comprehensive means of correlation and prediction of all of the hydrate equilibrium regions of the phase diagram, without separate prediction schemes for two-, three-, and four-phase regions, inhibition, and so forth as in Chapter 4. However, for a qualitative understanding of trends and an approximation (or a check) of prediction schemes in this chapter, the previous chapter is a valuable tool. [Pg.257]

Figure 13.11 Overview diagram of the NCTR Four-Phase approach for priority setting. In Phase I, chemicals with molecular weight < 94 or > 1000 or containing no ring structure will be rejected. In Phase II, three approaches (structural alerts, pharmacophores, and classification methods) that include a total of 11 models are used to make a qualitative activity prediction. In Phase III, a 3D QSAR/CoMFA model is used to make a more accurate quantitative activity prediction. In Phase IV, an expert system is expected to make a decision on priority setting based on a set of rules. Different phases are hierarchical different methods within each phase are complementary. Figure 13.11 Overview diagram of the NCTR Four-Phase approach for priority setting. In Phase I, chemicals with molecular weight < 94 or > 1000 or containing no ring structure will be rejected. In Phase II, three approaches (structural alerts, pharmacophores, and classification methods) that include a total of 11 models are used to make a qualitative activity prediction. In Phase III, a 3D QSAR/CoMFA model is used to make a more accurate quantitative activity prediction. In Phase IV, an expert system is expected to make a decision on priority setting based on a set of rules. Different phases are hierarchical different methods within each phase are complementary.
The four main methods that are used during the HOW phase in Project Management are ... [Pg.264]

FNH is the second most frequent benign hepatic tumour. It is a pseudotumorous regenerative node, most frequently occurring in women. Four-phase cholescintigra-phy using Tc-IDA is currently the best method of detection. In 80-90% of cases, perfusion is good with hypervascular tumours of > 2—3 cm in diameter. This results in initial enhancement of the FNH. However, the... [Pg.194]

In the standard solution-phase method discussed in the previous section, a methyl ester was used to protect the carboxyl group during formation of the amide bond. In the solid-phase method, however, a solid polymer particle is the ester protecting group. Four steps are required in solid-phase peptide synthesis ... [Pg.1097]

The New developed four-step method with minimal phase-lag is the most efficient one. [Pg.190]

From the viewpoint of scientific methodology there are three main tasks in CAPE representation of the problem, generation of several alternative solutions, and selection of the best one. These tasks correspond to the activities realized in four phases of any scientific method analysis (description of the problem and identification of the objectives), hypothesis (generation of solutions), synthesis (comparing the solutions), and validation (formulation of conclusions). The activities realized in the last two phases correspond to the selection task in CAPE. [Pg.518]

API and Bureau of Mines Projects. Some of the most important current work on the sulfur compounds present in petroleum is being carried out under the auspices of the American Petroleum Institute under Project 48 which was organized in 1948 to conduct fundamental studies on the synthesis, properties, and identification of sulfur compounds in petroleum. At present. Project 48 consists essentially of four phases (1) production and purification of sulfur compounds and the determination of their common physical properties (2) measurement of thermodynamic properties of pure sulfur compounds (3) identification and measurement of sulfur compounds in crude oil and (4) development of methods of synthesis and identification of sulfur compounds. Work on the first three phases, combined as Project 48A, is being conducted at the U. S. Bureau of Mines under the supervision of H. M. Smith as project director. Work on the fourth... [Pg.416]

The phase composition of the resulted specimens was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Rod-like pieces (3x3xl5mm) and disk-shaped pieces (2mm thickness and 10mm diameter) were cut out for the electrical conductivity measurement and the thermal conductivity measurement, respectively. Microstmcture and phase distribution were observed by a scanning electron microscopy equipped with EPMA (JEOL JXA-8621MX). Electrical conductivity was measured using a D.C. four-probe method. Thermal conductivity was measured using a laser-flash technique. All the measurements were performed in the temperature range of 300 to 1200 K. [Pg.558]

Electrical resistivity measurement adopted conventional four probes method. Seebeck coefficient was measured by the standard DC method. Thermal conductivity k was calculated from density, specific heat, and thermal diffiisivity. Specific heat measurement was carried out by use of a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC model 8230, Rigaku, Japan) compared with a standard material of a -AI2O3. The values of thermal diffiisivity obtained from a differential phase analysis of photo-pyroelectric signal (AL- A 0 analysis) [9]. All measiu ements were done at room temperature. [Pg.613]


See other pages where Method four-phase is mentioned: [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.219]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]




SEARCH



Method phase

© 2024 chempedia.info