Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Four-component basis functions

A. Finite-basis sets The molecular wave functions are represented as a finite sum of atom-centred four-component basis functions, which causes a spurious force often called orbital basis correction (OBC) (also known as Pulay force (Pulay 1983)). For an atom centred at Ra it reads... [Pg.156]

Strict relations exist between the two large components and the two small components, and these may be imposed directly, resulting in large and small component basis sets, and from Eq. [66]. These basis sets may then be used to describe the four-component spinors as they appear in Eq. [66]. A simpler procedure is to expand the spinors in four-component basis functions composed of ordinary Gaussian or Slater functions as follows ... [Pg.189]

Methods for solid-state calculations have been devised on the basis of the Dirac equation (bei der Kellen and Freeman 1996 Shick et al. 1999 Wang et al. 1992). Very recent progress has been achieved in the framework of four-component density functional theory for solids (Theileis and Bross 2000) (compare also the review on the... [Pg.87]

The relativistic correction for the kinetic energy in the Dirac equation is naturally applicable to the Kohn-Sham equation. This relativistic Kohn-Sham equation is called the Dirac-KohnSham equation (Rajagopal 1978 MacDonald and Vosko 1979). The Dirac-Kohn-Sham equation is founded on the Rajagopal-Callaway theorem, which is the relativistic expansion of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem on the basis of QED (Rajagopal and Callaway 1973). In this theorem, two theorems are contained The first theorem proves that the four-component external potential, which is the vector-potential-extended external potential, is determined by the four-component current density, which is the current-density-extended electron density. On the other hand, the second theorem establishes the variational principle for every four-component current density. See Sect. 6.5 for vector potential and current density. Consequently, the solution of the Dirac-Kohn-Sham equation is represented by the four-component orbital. This four-component orbital is often called a molecular spinor. However, this name includes no indication of orbital, which is the solution of one-electron SCF equations moreover, the targets of the calculations are not restricted to molecules. Therefore, in this book, this four-component orbital is called an orbital spinor. The Dirac-Kohn-Sham wavefunction is represented by the Slater determinant of orbital spinors (see Sect. 2.3). Following the Roothaan method (see Sect. 2.5), orbital spinors are represented by a linear combination of the four-component basis spinor functions, Xp, ... [Pg.147]

So far, we have only discussed the four-component basis-set approach in connection with the simplest ab initio wave-function model, namely for a single Slater determinant provided by Dirac-Hartree-Fock theory. We know, however, from chapter 8 how to improve on this model and shall now discuss some papers with a specific focus on correlated four-component basis-set methods. [Pg.428]

If the basis set is restricted to one pn basis function on each sp2 carbon, if the two-electron integrals ignore all three-center or four-center ones, and if we exclude exchange components, one has the Pariser-Parr-Pople model. If, further, all two-electron integrals are set to zero except for the repulsion between opposite spins on the same site and the one-electron tunneling terms are restricted to nearest neighbors, the result is the Hubbard Hamiltonian... [Pg.10]

The ability to use precisely the same basis set parameters in the relativistic and non-relativistic calculations means that the basis set truncation error in either calculation cancels, to an excellent approximation, when we calculate the relativistic energy correction by taking the difference. The cancellation is not exact, because the relativistic calculation contains additional symmetry-types in the small component basis set, but the small-component overlap density of molecular spinors involving basis functions whose origin of coordinates are located at different centres is so small as to be negligible. The non-relativistic molecular structure calculation is, for all practical purposes, a precise counterpoise correction to the four-component relativistic molecular... [Pg.133]

The inclusion of relativistic effects is essential in quantum chemical studies of molecules containing heavy elements. A full relativistic calculation, i.e. based upon Quantum Electro Dynamics, is only feasible for the smallest systems. In the SCF approximation it involves the solution of the Dirac Fock equation. Due to the four component complex wave functions and the large number of basis functions needed to describe the small component Dirac spinors, these computations are much more demanding than the corresponding non-relativistic ones. This limits Dirac Fock calculations, which can be performed using e.g. the MOLFDIR package [1], to small molecular systems, UFe being a typical example, see e.g. [2]. [Pg.251]

The molecular four-component spinors constructed this way are orthogonal to the inner core spinors of the atom, because the atomic basis functions used in Eq. (6.4) are generated with the inner core shells treated as frozen. [Pg.267]

Variational one-center restoration. In the variational technique of one-center restoration (VOCR) [79, 80], the proper behavior of the four-component molecular spinors in the core regions of heavy atoms can be restored as an expansion in spherical harmonics inside the sphere with a restoration radius, Rvoa, that should not be smaller than the matching radius, Rc, used at the RECP generation. The outer parts of spinors are treated as frozen after the RECP calculation of a considered molecule. This method enables one to combine the advantages of two well-developed approaches, molecular RECP calculation in a gaussian basis set and atomic-type one-center calculation in numerical basis functions, in the most optimal way. This technique is considered theoretically in [80] and some results concerning the efficiency of the one-center reexpansion of orbitals on another atom can be found in [75]. [Pg.267]


See other pages where Four-component basis functions is mentioned: [Pg.403]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.988]    [Pg.2483]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.155]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.232 ]




SEARCH



Basis functions

© 2024 chempedia.info