Forecasting forecast value added

The residual standard deviation is Sr = 5.558, the forecast standard deviation is Sq = 5.63 in the middle of the experimental domain. The coefficient of the linear correlation is r = 0.9966. The table below gives some examples of estimations compared with the extreme experimental values found in literature. The confidence range at 95% of the forecast is added in order to show the quality of the estimate. 

FVA uses standard forecast performance measurements (metrics) to identify value-added or non-value-added activities in the process that contribute to the accuracy or inaccuracy of the demand forecast. The result is a mechanism that reduces non-value-added touch points, thus improving the overall accuracy. Companies that have successfully implemented FVA have experienced significant improvement in overall forecast accuracy and reduced cycle times. If an activity does not improve the accuracy of the statistical baseline forecast, it should be eliminated, or minimized (simplified), to reduce cycle time and resources. 

Implementing FVA into the demand management process requires that forecasts be recorded and saved before and after each cycle. Having the capabilities to store forecast history by a stream of activities (e.g., consensus forecast adjustments, managerial overrides, price lift calculations, etc.) is critical to measuring the value-added, or non-value-added, contribution to the overall process. Utilizing the statistical baseline forecast as the default is the key to establishing a benchmark to measure the effectiveness of all the touch points in the process. Unfortunately, few companies capture the appropriate data, or the level of detail on a historical basis, to conduct FVA. This is an opportunity. 

Algorithms and software will be selected to greatly improve the accuracy of forecasts and match demand planning with supply capacity. Cycle times will also shrink as non-value-adding steps are eliminated. In the financial flow, schemes will be introduced to speed payments and eliminate any errors and reconciliation. In short, the SRM results include a list of surprising means to add benehts for both hrms. 

Cost Indices The value of money will change because of inflation and deflation. Hence cost data can be accurate only at the time when they are obtained and soon go out of date. Data from cost records of equipment and projects purchased in the past may be converted to present-day values by means of a cost index. The present cost of the item is found by multiplying the historical cost by the ratio of the present cost index divided oy the index applicable at the previous date. Ideally each cost item affected by inflation should be forecast separately. Labor costs, construction costs, raw-materials and energy prices, and product prices all change at different rates. Composite indices are derived by adding weighted fractions of the component indices. Most cost indices represent national averages, and local values may differ considerably. 

The uncertainties of forecast have been calculated from the standard deviations of forecast awarding five points. The uncertainty subtracted and added to the estimated value gives a confidence interval of 95% for the LEL. 

Using this model, one cannot forecast the adsorption of the background electrolyte ions because this model do not consider the reactions responsible for such a process. Zeta potential values, calculated on the basis of this model, are usually too high, nevertheless, because of its simplicity the model is applied very often. In a more complicated model of edl, the three plate model (see Fig. 3), besides the mentioned surface plate and the diffusion layer, in Stern layer there are some specifically adsorbed ions. The surface charge is formed by = SOHJ and = SO- groups, also by other groups formed by complexation or pair formation with background electrolyte ions = SOHj An- and = SO Ct+. It is assumed that both, cation (Ct+) and anion (A-), are located in the same distance from the surface of the oxide and form the inner Helmholtz plane (IHP). In this case, beside mentioned parameters for two layer model, the additional parameters should be added, i.e., surface complex formation constants (with cation pKct or anion pKAn) and compact and diffuse layer capacities. 

By most measures, the Acid Rain Program has been a model for successful emission trading systems. Allowances in Phase I sold for approximately 100 per ton of SOj, well under half of what had been forecast (about 250/ton.). Since 1994, allowances have cost 65 to 210 per ton as scrubber technology has become cheaper, and it has become less expensive to switch to low-sulfur coal. Sulfur dioxide emissions declined faster than anticipated and the market has now reached a value of 2 billion/year. Twenty-seven units added scrubbers accounting for 45% of the reductions in 1995-96. Seven large units accounted for two-thirds of this amount. Many units also switched fuels - almost all from high to lower sulfur coal. ... 

Planners and generated forecasts have high credibility inside the organization and are recognized as an added value function. 

A common measure of forecast error is the mean absolute deviation (MAD). The MAD is easily calculated and is easily interpreted. The MAD is calculated by adding the absolute value of the forecast errors each period (I Demand - Forecast ) and then taking the average of this total. This is illustrated in Table 8.1. 

Catalysis is of greatest relevance for chemical technology. It is assumed that about 90% of all chemical processes work with the help of at least one catalyst. It is further assumed that 80% of the added value of the chemical industry and about 20% of the world economy depend direcfly or indirectly on catalysis. The catalyst market (the value of traded catalysts) was about 10 in 2007, but at the same time the value of the goods produced by these catalysts was at least 100 times higher > l x 10 Weitkamp and Glaeser, 2003]. A recent article forecasts that the value of traded catalysts will reach 17.2 billion in 2014 with an actual rise of 6% per year (Hydrocarbon Processing, 2011)... 

For commodity products. Xerox coined the term deliver JIT that is, the product had to be delivered out of stock. Where sales forecasts are traditionally poor, the challenge was one of flexibility, simplicity and speed of manufacture. For mid-range products, it was unrealistic to hold just in case inventories of products that are too complex to be assembled quickly. Instead, finish JIT was the term coined to describe the new policy of building semi-finished products with the minimum of added value, consistent with being able to complete and deliver the product in the five-day target. Finally, build JIT... 

---