Fixed-time approach

BATH-OPTIMIZED TASK-ORIENTED CONTROL 4.5.1 Fixed Time Approach... 

The fixed-time approach is an integral technique, although conditions are usually so arranged that measurement times and concentration changes are small enough to produce a good approximation to the instantaneous reaction-rate. 

In order to use the fixed-time approach, several approximations to simplify this equation are necessary. First of all, the relative change of concentration (A[S]/[S]i) must be made very small (less than 2%) during the interval A/ so that the higher-order terms of the series can be ignored, which gives... 

There are two basic methods that have been used to simulated kinetics via Monte Carlo approaches[ l. The first is termed the fixed-time approach, in which every site on the surface has a set of probabilities associated with the different kinetic events that can occur at these sites. This could include diffusion, reaction, adsorption, and desorption processes. The state of the system then moves in fixed incremented steps of time and subsequently surveys all of the physicochemical steps to determine which of them can take place within the given (short) time step. This is accomphshed by sampling every site and determining whether it changes due to the occurrence of a kinetic process. This is determined by drawing a random munber for each potential step and comparing it with the transition probability P s for that particular kinetic step (r) at site (s) ... 

The fixed-time approach has proven effective in modeling well-defined reaction systems which have a sequence of known steps. The benefits of this approach are that the user is able to specify the time step at which the simulation proceeds. This helps to overcome some of the difficulties associated with disparate time scales. Very fast processes can be treated as pseudo-equilibrated, thus enabling the simulation to move to the time scales of interest. 

One of the drawbacks associated with the fixed-time approach, however, is that at any give point in time one needs to have all of the possible future pathways worked out in order to calculate the probability that within that particular time step a sequence of events occm. This becomes challenging and expensive computationally as the network of smface processes is rather complex. 

A second drawback of the fixed-time approach is that it is mathematically not exact. The accuracy of the simulation is governed by the choice of the time step used. Only in the limit of an infinitesimal time step does the method becomes mathematically exact. For simulations performed at very small time steps, accuracy is not an issue. Although the fixed time algorithm has proven to be fairly effective for certain gas-phase reaction systemsl " , nearly all of the published studies on surfaces use what is known as the variable time-step approachl . 

As mentioned in Section IV. A, a straightforward way to deal with optimal control problems is to parameterize them as piecewise polynomial functions on a predefined set of time zones. This suboptimal representation has a number of advantages. First, the approaches developed in the previous subsection can be applied directly. Secondly, for many process control applications, control moves are actually implemented as piecewise constants on fixed time intervals, so the parameterization is adequate for this application. 

Experimentally, the traditional methods for logP<)/w measurement are the shake-flask method [36] and the slow-stir technique [37], where the chemical is mixed with water and an immiscible organic phase, such as 1-octanol, at constant temperature for a fixed time. This is followed by an analysis of the chemical concentration in the two phases by UV-visible spectroscopy [38]. Although accurate, this approach is tedious and suffers from the well-known limitations of the Beer-Lambert law. These two methods for determining logPc/w values are best suited for chemicals with low to moderate hydrophobicities. 

This normalized collection time is plotted in Fig. 4.49 as a function of the relative source strength N(r)/I l(r = 1) and for 3 = 0. It can be seen that for fixed accuracy a the normalized collection time approaches its asymptotic value at a relative... 

Instead of using the virtual impactor approach, North American air monitoring programs in the 1980s and later have adopted simpler reference methods that use the weighing of filters in the laboratory. The filters are obtained from samplers equipped with an inlet device that provides for a sharp cut-point in particle entry for samples of particles < 10 xm diameter or <2.5 [im diameter, which are operated over a fixed time period of 24 hours. The inlet fractionation is facilitated either by a carefully designed cyclone or by an impactor. The combination of the two samplers can give estimates of mass concentration for fine-particle and coarse-particle concentrations. 

The woik of Bennett and his co-workers [87] (discussed in detail on the p. 312) was an exception a 50/50 mixture of di- and tri-nitrotoluene was nitrated by shaking with mixed acids of various compositions for a fixed time. The reaction was then quenched with cold water and the proportion of the dinitrotoluene which has been converted to trinitrotoluene was determined. The conversion, Mid the reaction rate, approach zero as the mole ratio water sulphuric acid approaches unity. This is significant, because if this ratio considerably exceeds 1.0 the N02+ ion is spectroscopically undetectable in sulphuric acid-nitric acid-water solutions. Bennett showed that various acid mixtures that gave the same conversion contained practically the same concentration of the N02+ ion, as determined by Raman spectra. Hetherington and Masson [84] had already found that the reaction rate became negligibly small at certain concentrations and that a line drawn through the limiting boundary almost coincides with the boundary of the area of spectroscopic detection of N02+ ions. 

In most operating manuals, it is claimed that the time to reach the equilibrium values must remain, for all measurements, constant and equal to that required to set the bridge to zero. However, for a given drop size, the direction and rate of approach to the equilibrium value were found to vary (Morris 1977). The use of a recorder to show the shape of the bridge imbalance-time trace is therefore strongly recommended. Readings must only be taken when the system has reached a steady state, rather than after a fixed time interval. 

Figure 4 shows a plot of the fraction of the final production Nj /N (1) vs time 0 with h as a parameter. Lower values of h result in higher values of this fraction at any fixed time, indicating that deactivation has a more pronounced effect on production at lower Thiele moduli. At high h values the curves are relatively straight and appear to approach a common asymptote at very high moduli. This is consistent with equations (17) and (18). 

Fixed Coordinate Approaches. In the fixed coordinate approach to airshed modeling, the airshed is divided into a three-dimensional grid for the numerical solution of some form of (7), the specific form depending upon the simplifying assumptions made. We classify the general methods for solution of the continuity equations by conventional finite difference methods, particle in cell methods, and variational methods. Finite difference methods and particle in cell methods are discussed here. Variational methods involve assuming the form of the concentration distribution, usually in terms of an expansion of known functions, and evaluating coeflBcients in the expansion. There is currently active interest in the application of these techniques (23) however, they are not yet suflBciently well developed that they may be applied to the solution of three-dimensional time-dependent partial differential equations, such as (7). For this reason we will not discuss these methods here. 

The principal numerical problem associated with the solution of (7) is that lengthy calculations are required to integrate several coupled nonlinear equations in three dimensions. However, models based on a fixed coordinate approach may be used to predict pollutant concentrations at all points of interest in the airshed at any time. This is in contrast to moving cell methods, wherein predictions are confined to the paths along which concentration histories are computed. 

Shortening the collection time is recommended when other hydride-forming elements present in the sample react more slowly than the analyte forming the volatile species. This fixed-time kinetic approach is less sensitive than its steady-state counterpart but provides better selectivity and shorter analysis times [32,33]. 

All assay methods are based on the forward ALD-catalyzed reaction. Both photometric fixed-time and continuous-monitoring procedures have been developed. In the analytical approach on which all the commonly used procedures and kits are based, the ALD reaction is coupled with two other enzyme reactions. Triosephosphate isomerase (EC 5.3.1.1) is added to ensure rapid conversion of all GLAP to DAP. Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.8) is added to reduce the DAP to glycerol-3-phosphate, with NADH acting as hydrogen donor. The decrease in NADH concentration is then measured. 

Fixed-time methods are advantageous because the measured quantity is directly proportional to the analyte concentration and because measurements can be made at any time during the progress of first-order reactions. When instrumental methods are used to monitor reactions by means of fixed-time procedures, the precision of the analytical results approaches the precision of the instrnment used. 

---