Five whys

The team uses its judgment and experience to find credible causes. Structured brainstorming may employ tools such as what if and five whys. 

Using contributory factor framework, cause and effect method, tree diagram, barrier analysis and the five why s technique. Each contributory factor identified in the analysis could be a causal factor or an influencing factor... 

The qualitative or quantitative evaluation of the fit of a respirator on an individual. Five Whys Technique... 

Transparency Openly reveal all the issues. Ask yourself five whys. Search for aU contributing causes. 

Rethinking Safety Learning from Laboratory Incidents Describes how you can learn lessons from a critical analysis of an incident using the five whys. ... 

In one very large organization, it was agreed that if the safety staff promoted adoption of a system as simple as a Five Why Technique to improve incident investigations and achieved a B-e grade in 2 years, a miracle would have been produced. 

The Five Why System. Available at http //search.isixsigma.com/b/q sn= 158097990 k=the+five+whys+technique+this+topic. 

They decided to simplify their written incident investigation procedure to encompass the very easily adopted Five Why inquiry system develop a convincing education program to obtain the necessary management buy-in promote the revised system throughout the... 

The system is not complex. It is easy to learn and use. The Five Why system has been related to the Ishikawa Fishbone Diagram, a cause-and-effect analysis system. 

Use information that clearly establishes the five Why s and one How, as discussed below. Being specific requires the use of designated individuals, locations, reasoning, and time frames that are tangible. 

It is useful to note that the quality gurus of Japan like numbered lists, for example the Seven Mudas, the Five Whys, and the Five Ss. However, the exact number of Ss is less important than observing the simple doctrine of achieving the elimination of wastes. 

While asking five whys wiU usually lead to a root cause, it is okay to ask six or seven whys if needed. When using this technique, remember that the focus is on identifying a broken or absent process, not a human or equipment failure. In the example above, an investigator could jump to the conclusion that not maintaining the vehicle to the recommended service schedule is operator negligence however, the operator may not have the training or parts to maintain the vehicle. In this case, a sixth why may be necessary in order to get to the true root cause of an accident. 

When conducting a JHA, the process attempts to tell the story of what is happening in the job. The Five Why s plus H questions (Who, What,Where,When,Why, and How) are used to categorize information to begin telling the story. The story becomes a clear and concise picture when used with accompanying data and feedback from employees. 

Depending on the complexity of the JHA (the story), the JHA developer might ask questions in several different ways. Refer to Tables 11.1-11.6 for a basic description ofThe Five Why s and H for consideration. 

---