First flow theory

Most processing methods involve flow in capillary or rectangular sections, which may be uniform or tapered. Therefore the approach taken here will be to develop first the theory for Newtonian flow in these channels and then when the Non-Newtonian case is considered it may be seen that the steps in the analysis are identical although the mathematics is a little more complex. At the end of the chapter a selection of processing situations are analysed quantitatively to illustrate the use of the theory. It must be stressed however, that even the more complex analysis introduced in this chapter will not give precisely accurate... 

The first term of Eq. (11-11) is the Stokes drag for steady motion at the instantaneous velocity. The second term is the added mass or virtual mass contribution which arises because acceleration of the particle requires acceleration of the fluid. The volume of the added mass of fluid is 0.5 F, the same as obtained from potential flow theory. In general, the instantaneous drag depends not only on the instantaneous velocities and accelerations, but also on conditions which prevailed during development of the flow. The final term in Eq. (11-11) includes the Basset history integral, in which past acceleration is included, weighted as t — 5) , where (t — s) is the time elapsed since the past acceleration. The form of the history integral results from diffusion of vorticity from the particle. 

The Lorentz procedure arbitrarily discards the enormous Heaviside component that misses the circuit entirely and is wasted. This results in a non sequitur of first magnitude in energy flow theory. 

Though there is fluid flow in the bulk of the electrolyte, it is found that there is a layer adjacent to the electrode in which the electrolyte is stationary, or stagnant. Thus the electron acceptors travel by convection from the bulk up to the stagnant layer and then cross the remaining boundary layer by diffusion. This transport by a convection-with-diffusion mechanism has not been taken into account so far. The equations for the time and space variation of concentration [i.e., Eq. (7.178)], for the transition time [Eq. (7.190)], and for the time variation of potential [Eq. (7.192)] have been derived for convection-free conditions, and they break down when convection becomes significant. The first approximation theory given above, therefore, deviates from experiment if the constant current is applied sufficiently long (times on the order of seconds) for convection to be important. 

The research of Roy Jackson combines theory and experiment in a distinctive fashion. First, the theory incorporates, in a simple manner, inertial collisions through relations based on kinetic theory, contact friction via the classical treatment of Coulomb, and, in some cases, momentum exchange with the gas. The critical feature is a conservation equation for the pseudo-thermal temperature, the microscopic variable characterizing the state of the particle phase. Second, each of the basic flows relevant to processes or laboratory tests, such as plane shear, chutes, standpipes, hoppers, and transport lines, is addressed and the flow regimes and multiple steady states arising from the nonlinearities (Fig. 6) are explored in detail. Third, the experiments are scaled to explore appropriate ranges of parameter space and observe the multiple steady states (Fig. 7). One of the more striking results is the... 

The preceding sections have been concerned primarily with direct solution techniques for problems in creeping-flow theory. Here, we discuss several general topics that evolve directly from these developments. The first two involve application of the so-called reciprocal theorem of low-Reynolds-number hydrodynamics. 

In spite of this, we shall see that potential-flow theory plays an important role in the development of asymptotic solutions for Re i>> 1. Indeed, if we compare the assumptions and analysis leading to (10-9) and then to (10-12) with the early steps in analysis of heat transfer at high Peclet number, it is clear that the solution to = 0 is a valid first approximation lor Re y> 1 everywhere except in the immediate vicinity of the body surface. There the body dimension, a, that was used to nondimensionalize (10-1) is not a relevant characteristic length scale. In this region, we shall see that the flow develops a boundary layer in which viscous forces remain important even as Re i>> 1, and this allows the no-shp condition to be satisfied. 

The conclusion to be drawn from the preceding discussion is that the potential-flow theory (10-9) [or, equivalently, (10 12) and (10 13)] does not provide a uniformly valid first approximation to the solution of the Navier Stokes and continuity equations (10-1) and (10 2) for Re 1. Furthermore, our experience in Chap. 9 with the thermal boundary-layer structure for large Peclet number would lead us to believe that this is because the velocity field near the body surface is characterized by a length scale 0(aRe n), instead of the body dimension a that was used to nondimensionalize (10-2). As a consequence, the terms V2co and u V >, in (10 6), which are nondimensionalized by use of a, are not 0(1) and independent of Re everywhere in the domain, as was assumed in deriving (10-7), but instead are increasing fimctions of Re in the region very close to the body surface. Thus in... 

Outer region, where variations of velocity are characterized by the length scale a of the body and potential-flow theory provides a valid first approximation in an asymptotic expansion of the solution for Re -> oo. 

Assuming that (10-112) can be solved subject to (10-96) and (10-97), the question is whether ue = xm corresponds to any physically realizable body shapes. To answer from first principles, we would have to solve an inverse problem in potential-flow theory. We do not propose to do that here. Rather, we simply state the result, which is that... 

Suppose that a is sufficiently small, i.e., We is sufficiently large, that surface tension plays no role in determining the bubble shape, except possibly locally in the vicinity of the rim where the spherical upper surface and the flat lower surface meet. Further, suppose that the Reynolds number is sufficiently large that the motion of the liquid can be approximated to a first approximation, by means of the potential-flow theory. Denote the radius of curvature at the nose of the bubble as R(dX 6 = 0). Show that a self-consistency condition for existence of a spherical shape with radius R in the vicinity of the stagnation point, 0 = 0, is that the velocity of rise of the bubble is... 

One concludes from (12-17a) and (12-17c) that neither 4> nor Vp is a function of the Reynolds number because Re does not appear in either equation. Consequently, dynamic pressure and its gradient in the x direction are not functions of the Reynolds number because Re does not appear in the dimensionless potential flow equation of motion, given by (12-16), from which /dx is calculated. In summary, two-dimensional momentum boundary layer problems in the laminar flow regime (1) focus on the component of the equation of motion in the primary flow direction, (2) use the equation of continuity to calculate the other velocity component transverse to the primary flow direction, (3) use potential flow theory far from a fluid-solid interface to calculate the important component of the dynamic pressure gradient, and (4) impose this pressme gradient across the momentum boundary layer. The following set of dimensionless equations must be solved for Vp, IP, u, and v in sequential order. The first three equations below are solved separately, but the last two equations are coupled ... 

Combining these results with Eq. (6.8) and using the proper model, for example, the Arrhenius approach, yields an equation that connects the measured quantities

kinetic parameters n, A, and Tact- Such an equation can only be solved numerically. Nowadays powerful sofiware is available that does the job of determining the kinetic parameters from the measured heat flow rate function. But to get reliable results, the proper kinetic model must be selected first. The theory behind it is not simple, and a lot of experience is necessary to handle the rather complex kinetic software. 

In many books, radial flow theory is studied superficially and dismissed after cursory derivation of the log r pressure solution. Here we will consider single-phase radial flow in detail. We will examine analytical formulations that are possible in various physical limits, for different types of liquids and gases, and develop efficient models for time and cost-effective solutions. Steady-state flows of constant density liquids and compressible gases can be solved analytically, and these are considered first. In Examples 6-1 to 6-3, different formulations are presented, solved, and discussed the results are useful in formation evaluation and drilling applications. Then, we introduce finite difference methods for steady and transient flows in a natural, informal, hands-on way, and combine the resulting algorithms with analytical results to provide the foundation for a powerful write it yourself radial flow simulator. Concepts such as explicit versus implicit schemes, von Neumann stability, and truncation error are discussed in a self-contained exposition. 

The first classical trajectory study of iinimoleciilar decomposition and intramolecular motion for realistic anhannonic molecular Hamiltonians was perfonned by Bunker [12,13], Both intrinsic RRKM and non-RRKM dynamics was observed in these studies. Since this pioneering work, there have been numerous additional studies [9,k7,30,M,M, ai d from which two distinct types of intramolecular motion, chaotic and quasiperiodic [14], have been identified. Both are depicted in figure A3,12,7. Chaotic vibrational motion is not regular as predicted by tire nonnal-mode model and, instead, there is energy transfer between the modes. If all the modes of the molecule participate in the chaotic motion and energy flow is sufficiently rapid, an initial microcanonical ensemble is maintained as the molecule dissociates and RRKM behaviour is observed [9], For non-random excitation initial apparent non-RRKM behaviour is observed, but at longer times a microcanonical ensemble of states is fonned and the probability of decomposition becomes that of RRKM theory. 

Our approach in this chapter is to alternate between experimental results and theoretical models to acquire familiarity with both the phenomena and the theories proposed to explain them. We shall consider a model for viscous flow due to Eyring which is based on the migration of vacancies or holes in the liquid. A theory developed by Debye will give a first view of the molecular weight dependence of viscosity an equation derived by Bueche will extend that view. Finally, a model for the snakelike wiggling of a polymer chain through an array of other molecules, due to deGennes, Doi, and Edwards, will be taken up. 

Single gas bubbles in an inviscid liquid have hemispherical leading surfaces and somewhat flattened wakes. Their rise velocity is governed by Bernoulli s theory for potential flow of fluid around the nose of the bubble. This was first solved by G. I. Taylor to give a rise velocity Ug of ... 

It is quickly evident, however, that it is necessary to blend theory with experiment to achieve the engineering objectives of predicting fluid-particle flows. Fortunately, there are several semi-empirical techniques available to do so (see Di Felice, 1995 for a review). Firstly, however, it is useful to define some more terms that will be used frequently. 

---