Fire risk, description

This standard contains terms, related definitions, and descriptions of terms used, or likely to be used, in fire standards and fire-risk standards. 

This paper recognizes the presence of a fire-risk in many products, as well as components. Fire risk was described by statistics for products that contain urethane foams. Those products can be related to fire fatalities, ignition source, or occupancy factors. The federal data collected about frequency and consequences of our nation s fire losses cannot tell us which, or how many, of these products did contain urethane foam. Our available data in that area cannot give a persuasive description of the situation. 

The safety role and responsibilities of individual employees will vary depending upon the size and nature of the organisation and the job description of the individual. For example, some employees will hold designated roles, e.g. fire wardens whose duties will include the proactive monitoring of certain fire risk control measures some employees may hold designated roles relating to the purchase of plant or equipment that satisfies certain statutory requirements some individuals, as discussed above, may be directors or managers of companies. 

Even, limited PSAs use and contain much information. This information may come as memos and process reports and flow sheets, equipment layout, system descriptions, toxic inventory, hazardous chemical reactions, test, maintenance and operating descriptions. From this, data and analyses are prepared regarding release quantities, doses, equipment reliability, probability of exposure, and the risk to workers, public, and environment. An executive summary analysis is detailed, and recommendations made for risk reduction. Thus the information will be text, calculations of envelope fracture stresses, temperatures, fire propagation, air dispersion, doses, and failure probabilities - primarily in tabular form. 

The book contains, in alphabetical order, failure rates, event rates and probabilities, and descriptive information which has been collected since 1970 in the course of doing risk and reliability assessments. Twenty appendices contain results of surveys on bursting discs, pipes, valves, relief valves, pump failures and information on human error, international fire losses, and blast effects. 

Predictive hazard evaluation procedures may be required when new and different processes, designs, equipment, or procedures are being contemplated. The Dow Fire and Explosion Index provides a direct method to estimate the risks in a chemical process based upon flammability and reactivity characteristics of the chemicals, general process hazards (as exothermic reactions, indoor storage of flammable liquids, etc.) and special hazards (as operation above the flash point, operation above the auto-ignition point, quantity of flammable liquid, etc.). Proper description of this index is best found in the 57-page Dows Fire and Explosion Index, Hazard Classification Guide, 5 th ed., AIChE, New York, 1981. 

Section 11 covers risks from mixtures. Because a mixture is not considered here, the section is empty. Selected physical data are described in Section 111. Section IV contains fire and explosion data, including a description of the toxic gases produced when acetone is exposed to a fire. The MSDSs are routinely made available to fire departments that may be faced with fighting a fire in a building where large amounts of chemicals are stored. 

Our model has three main parts. The first part consists of the EC 61508 steps needed for developing the environment description and then the phases 1-4 (concept, overall scope definitions, hazard and risk analysis and overall safety requirements). These initial steps result in the initial requirements of the system that is to be developed. This is the key input to the second part of the model, which is the Scrum process. The requirements are documented as product backlog items. A product backlog is a list of all functional and safety related system requirements, prioritized by the customer. We have observed that the safety requirements are quite stable (e.g. the response time has to be less than the Process safety time for a fire alarm system), while the functional requirements may change considerably over time. Development with a high probability of changes to requirements will favour an agile approach. 

Brief description of potential accumulation Location(s) Procedures to eliminate or minimize risk of fire due to improper storage or disposal ... 

---