Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

February Revolution

On Jan. 19, 1917, Milner left London at the head of an Allied mission which, during three weeks in Petrograd, laid down a suitable scheme for keeping the Russian forces supplied with Western munitions.. .. It was widely believed at the time that the February Revolution (installing Kerensky — ed.) was hatched at the British Embassy. [Pg.258]

Henderson, James A., and Theodore Eisenberg. 1990. The Quiet Revolution in Products Liability An Empirical Study of Legal Change. UCLA Law Review 37 (February) 479-553. [Pg.88]

A detailed account of the two Russian Revolutions of 1917 (February and, above all, October) would take us too far afield. What is possible, however, is to sketch briefly some of the principal ways in which the actual revolutionary process resembled little the organizational doctrines advocated in What Is to Be Done The high-modernist... [Pg.157]

In the case of the Bolshevik Revolution, it was also necessary that the official narrative include a genuinely popular mass movement of which the Bolsheviks eventually assumed leadership. Marxist historiography required a militant, revolutionary proletariat. This was an aspect of the February and October events that did not have to be invented. What had to be written out of the account, however, was the ferocious struggle between the new state apparatus on one hand and the autonomous soviets and peasantry on the other. [Pg.391]

Figure 34. Painting by Davis Meltzer, from James B. Billard, The Revolution in American Agriculture," with illustrations by James R. Blair, National Geographic 137, no. 2 (February 1970) 184-85. Used by permission of Davis Meltzer/National Geographic Image Collection. Figure 34. Painting by Davis Meltzer, from James B. Billard, The Revolution in American Agriculture," with illustrations by James R. Blair, National Geographic 137, no. 2 (February 1970) 184-85. Used by permission of Davis Meltzer/National Geographic Image Collection.
W. McDonough and M. Braungart, The Next Industrial Revolution, The Atlantic, October 1998. Available at http //www.theatlantic.com/issues/98oct/industry.htm, accessed February 23, 2004. [Pg.484]

Rusk to LBJ, Policy toward Communist China, 22 February 1968, ibid, p. 646. A good discussion of the Johnson administration s positive response to the Cultural Revolution as compared to the Kennedy administration s negative reaction to the GLF is provided in Victor Kaufman, A Response to Chaos The United States, the Great Leap Forward, and the Cultural Revolution, 1961-1968, Journal of American-East Asian Relations 7(1-2) (Spring/Summer 1998), pp. 73-92. [Pg.60]

Cavalh-Sforza, LL The DNA revolution in population genetics Trends in Genetics, Vol. 14, No 2, February 1998,14 60-66... [Pg.493]

Similarly, Russian historians have focused more on the February and October Revolutions of 1917 than on the war itself. As one scholar has noted, most have seen the war as a disintegration leading to a disgraceful end. In a similar vein, studies of Russian science have largely ignored the war. Only recently have scholars begun seeing the war as a critical moment in the establishment of the new Soviet State. ... [Pg.75]

M. W. Browne, A microscopic revolution - nanotubes expected to replace silicon devices, In International Herald Tribune, page 10, February 19,1998. [Pg.45]

In Britain, crucial historical factors include the spread of literacy following the educational reforms of the 1870s the advent of mass-market newspapers such as the Daily Mail (launched in 185(6), and other mass-market literary products the extension of the electoral franchise in the Reform Act of 1867, and the rapid growth of socialist politics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Beyond Britain, the Russian Revolutions of February and October 1917 offered one example of what might happen when the masses (or those acting in their name) took political control. [Pg.115]

Galileo Galilei, February 15,1564-January 8,1642, was an Italian physicist, astronomer, and philosopher who is closely associated with the scientific revolution. His achievements include improvements to the telescope, a variety of astronomical observations, the first and second laws of motion, and effective support for Copernicanism. [Pg.25]

Antoine Baume (not Beaume) (Senlis, 26 February 1728-Paris, 15 October 1804), the son of an inn-keeper, was a pupil of E. F. Geoffrey s, in 1752 entered the College de Pharmacie in Paris, soon becoming master apothecary and demonstrator in chemistry, and at the same time carried on the business of pharmacist until 1780, and again after the Revolution had deprived him of his means. He became a member of the Institut in 1796. He says that he was lecture demonstrator to Macquer for 25 years, when they gave 16 courses, each with over 2000 experiments, and that he himself made over 10,000 experiments in addition j ai plus opere que lu, et je m en sais bon gre. Besides some communications to the Academy Baume wrote several books ... [Pg.57]

Pierre Thouvenel (Lorraine, 1747-Paris, 38 February 1815), General Inspector of Mineral Waters in France, fugitive to Italy in the Revolution, physician to Louis XVIII on the Restoration, published on animal nutrition, on mucous bodies and on medical chemistry, and was the first French author to write on galvanism. He made analyses of cantharides and woodlice and with his brother wrote a prize essay on saltpetre (see p. 466) Pierre Thouvenel also gained a prize on this subject. Rewrote on the phlogistic and antiphlogistic theories. ... [Pg.695]

B. Ekser, M. Ezzelarab, H. Kara, D.J. van der Windt, M. Wijkstrom, R. Bottino, M. Trucco, D.K.C. Cooper, Chnical xenotransplantation the next medical revolution Lancet (London, England) 379 (9816) (February 2012) 672—683. [Pg.563]

Murray, J., Beyond Anti-Tarnish An SMT Revolution, ftrwted Circuit Fabrication, February 1993, pp.32-34. [Pg.1055]

Address of Mr. H. Gardner McKerrow, 4-5 in Official Report of Convention of American Dyestuff Manufacturers, ADR 2 (February 4, 1918) 4-8 also, A Proposed National Association of Chemical Industries, ADR 1 (October 29, 1917) 8-9 Haynes, American Chemical Industry, 3 253 Dyestuff Industry Organizes, DCM 4 (January 23, 1918) 5-6. On Hemingway, see Haynes, American Chemical Industry, 3 118, 253. Sherwin-Williams purchased Frank Hemingway, Inc., in 1920. Blaszczyk has noted that the end users of dyes— those in the fashion industry—also pursued standardization of colors through the Textile Color Card Association to aid buyers. Blaszczyk, The Color Revolution, 77-93. [Pg.531]


See other pages where February Revolution is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.355]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 , Pg.148 , Pg.390 ]




SEARCH



February

Revolution

© 2024 chempedia.info