Fall-off parameters

Figure 5. Relationship between the fall-off parameter B of the hardening coefficient and the atomic polarizability a (in 10 24 cm3).

The mechanism of the reaction CH2C(CH3)0 + NO is very similar to that discussed for CH2CHO + NO. The formation of 0N-CH2C(CH3)0 is the dominant reaction pathway. The fall-off behavior of the reaction system was also analyzed within the Troe formalism.17"23 The fall-off curves of Delbos et al.m were constructed on the basis of their experimental results. The best fit leads to results corresponding to the fall-off parameters... 

Applying the Tafel equation with Uq, we obtain the polarization curves for Pt and PtsNi (Fig. 3.10). The experimental polarization curves fall off at the transport limiting current since the model only deals with the surface catalysis, this part of the polarization curve is not included in the theoretical curves. Looking at the low current limit, the model actually predicts the relative activity semiquantitatively. We call it semiquantitative since the absolute value for the prefactor on Pt is really a fitting parameter. 

BUSTER chooses the minimal grid necessary to avoid aliasing effects, based on the prior prejudice used and on the fall-off of the structure factor amplitudes with resolution for the 23 K L-alanine valence density reconstruction the grid was (64 144 64). The cell parameters for the crystal are a = 5.928(1)A b = 12.260(2)A c = 5.794(1) A [45], so that the grid step was shorter than 0.095 A along each axis. 

In Bohr s theory, only estimates of maximum and minimum impact parameters are necessary. Better computations are required for determining the transverse distribution of lost energy or the effect of secondary electrons. The minimum impact parameter according to classical mechanics is ze2/mv2 from angular momentum consideration in quantum mechanics, it is h /mv. In practice, the larger of these two is taken. Also, the impulse approximation used by Bohr for the maximum impact parameter is not an absolute rule energy transfer beyond bmax falls off exponentially (Orear et al., 1956 Mozumder, 1974). 

P has a very suggestive form in relation to Figure 8.26. For a large concentration of acceptors, the second term in the denominator can be made considerably smaller than 1 (i.e., Xt is proportional to acceptor concentration [A]), and P will be independent of concentration. On the other hand, for a small concentration of acceptors, the second term in the denominator can be made considerably larger than 1, and P will fall off linearly as the concentration is reduced. The scale factor in all of this is Q. With Q large, the transition from concentration independence to linear concentration dependence will be at low acceptor concentrations. P falls to 5 when the second term in the denominator of Eq. (8.27) is equal to 1, and so a critical concentration of acceptors [A], /2 can be defined to characterize the falloff. Expressing Xt in terms of molecular parameters (x, = em[A] ln(10)/, where n is the particle refractive index, em is the molar decadic extinction coefficient, [A] is the concentration of acceptors, and k is 2n/X) yields... 

The parameter 8 must be sufficiently large so that a substantial portion of the entire integral is contained within the integration limits xlu - 8, xlu + 8. However, since the integrand is peaked about the value t = xlu and falls off exponentially for t xlu, we reasonably expect 8 to be a small quantity. 

Troe s analysis summarized above requires the knowledge of both low- and high-pressure rate constants, in addition to an empirically determined to describe the actual fall-off behavior. We already discussed methods for the estimation of high-pressure rate parameters. The low-pressure rate parameters can be estimated by recognizing the fact that ko represents pure energy transfer limitations, and thus can be determined from rate of collisional energization of A and from the thermal energy distribution function K E, T) ... 

The ideal point model is useful when a point in the space can be found that is most like the physicochemical parameter. Thus, the ideal point is the hypothetical stimulus, if it existed, that would contain the maximum amount of the physicochemical attribute. The attribute reaches its maximum at the ideal point and falls off in all directions as the square of the distance from the ideal point. The ideal point is located in an MDS space by a special kind of regression proposed by Carroll ( ) that correlates the physicochemical attribute values with the stimulus coordinates and a dummy variable constructed from the sums of squares of the coordinates for each point ... 

---