Fixed-effect factors

In addition it is now time to think about the two assumption models, or types of analysis of variance. ANOVA type 1 assumes that all levels of the factors are included in the analysis and are fixed (fixed effect model). Then the analysis is essentially interested in comparing mean values, i.e. to test the significance of an effect. ANOVA type 2 assumes that the included levels of the factors are selected at random from the distribution of levels (random effect model). Here the final aim is to estimate the variance components, i.e. the variance fractions with respect to total variance caused by the samples taken or the measurements made. In that case one is well advised to ensure balanced designs, i.e. equally occupied cells in the above scheme, because only then is the estimation process straightforward. 

Analysis of variance in general serves as a statistical test of the influence of random or systematic factors on measured data (test for random or fixed effects). One wants to test if the feature mean values of two or more classes are different. Classes of objects or clusters of data may be given a priori (supervised learning) or found in the course of a learning process (unsupervised learning see Section 5.3, cluster analysis). In the first case variance analysis is used for class pattern confirmation. 

Table I summarises the average data observed for two major carbonization parameters, the mass yield and the fixed carbon content of charcoal. A highly significant effect of temperature was observed, as well as a significant effect of the residence time and a significant interaction between these two factors. The effect of heating rate was not significant.

Fixed Effects, Random Effects, Main Effects, and Interactions Nested and Crossed Factors Aliasing and Confounding... 

In this section, three categories of experimental design are considered for method validation experiments. An important quality of the design to be used is balance. Balance occurs when the levels each factor (either a fixed effects factor or a random effects variance component) are assigned the same number of experimental trials. Lack of balance can lead to erroneous statistical estimates of accuracy, precision, and linearity. Balance of design is one of the most important considerations in setting up the experimental trials. From a heuristic view this makes sense, we want an equivalent amount of information from each level of the factors. 

The experimental design selected, as well as the type of factors in the design, dictates the statistical model to be used for data analysis. As mentioned previously, fixed effects influence the mean value of a response, while random effects influence the variance. In this validation, the model has at least one fixed effect of the overall average response and the intermediate precision components are random effects. When a statistical model has both fixed effects and random effects it is called a mixed effects model. 

Note that this is a fixed effect ANOYA, as the instances of the factor are confined to specific values, that is, the method of analysis is being chosen by the analyst. 

Note that here 8, (j> are coordinates of the electron in the molecule-fixed coordinate system 8, do not specify, nor are they affected by, the orientation of the molecule-fixed coordinate system relative to the laboratory-fixed system. Since the dependence of an orbital angular momentum basis function of the one-electron ( A)) or many-electron ( A)) type can be expressed in terms of a factor e A( + °) or e A( +< °), where phase factor, the effect of crv xz) on a molecular orbital becomes... 

Let us consider a single covariate and one qualitative factor in a fixed effects model. The basic model in regression is... 

Until now, we have discussed group comparison or factor analysis v/iih fixed effects. Fixed effects means that the levels of our independent variables will be the same (fixed) in any attempted replication of our experiment. We have ehosen a eertain seleetion of levels that are of interest and do not attempt to generalize beyond these levels. As an example, let us consider a comparison of the impedance of electrode types. We could do a study in which the aim is to compare a certain selection of electrode types with different characteristics, and electrode type would then be a fixed factor. We could also do a study in which the aim is to assess whether the electrode type has an effect on the measured impedance in general. The electrode type would then be a random factor, and our sample of electrode types (levels) would be treated as a random selection of the overall population of possible electrode types/manufacturers. In the first case, our test result will be the explicit differences between the impedance of the selected electrode t5rpes, but for the second case the test result will be the general effect of electrode tjrpe on the impedance. In some cases. 

In Section 3.3 a method was described for comparing two means to test whether they differ significantly. In analytical work there are often more than two means to be compared. Some possible situations are comparing the mean concentration of protein in solution for samples stored under different conditions comparing the mean results obtained for the concentration of an analyte by several different methods and comparing the mean titration results obtained by several different experimentalists using the same apparatus. In all these examples there are two possible sources of variation. The first, which is always present, is due to the random error in measurement. This was discussed in detail in the previous chapter it is this error which causes a different result to be obtained each time a measurement is repeated under the same conditions. The second possible source of variation is due to what is known as a controlled or fixed-effect factor. For the examples above. 

We call 7] the effectiveness factor. The effectiveness factor accounts for the concentration difference along the pore of a solid-supported catalyst. If A pD( p/l p) Rxn> that is, if the fixed-bed reactor is reaction rate limited, then rj= 1 and if /cRxn PD( p/f)p)j that is, if the fixed-bed reactor is pore diffusion rate limited, then r]<. r] depends only upon the pore structure of the solid-supported catalyst and is readily calculated via a variety of published methods [8]. 

Using the determined weighting factors, the effects of the examined SCI at company Cl can be quantified. This is done by multiplying the affected balance sheet and P L items with the specific weighting factors and the respective elements from vectors and By suitable assignment to the value drivers of revenue, cost, current assets and fixed assets, the intermediate results can be introduced into the calculation procedure... 

Figure A3.8.3 Quantum activation free energy curves calculated for the model A-H-A proton transfer reaction described 45. The frill line is for the classical limit of the proton transfer solute in isolation, while the other curves are for different fully quantized cases. The rigid curves were calculated by keeping the A-A distance fixed. An important feature here is the direct effect of the solvent activation process on both the solvated rigid and flexible solute curves. Another feature is the effect of a fluctuating A-A distance which both lowers the activation free energy and reduces the influence of the solvent. The latter feature enliances the rate by a factor of 20 over the rigid case.

Equation (Bl.8.6) assumes that all unit cells really are identical and that the atoms are fixed hi their equilibrium positions. In real crystals at finite temperatures, however, atoms oscillate about their mean positions and also may be displaced from their average positions because of, for example, chemical inlioniogeneity. The effect of this is, to a first approximation, to modify the atomic scattering factor by a convolution of p(r) with a trivariate Gaussian density function, resulting in the multiplication ofy ([Pg.1366]

The classical experiment tracks the off-gas composition as a function of temperature at fixed residence time and oxidant level. Treating feed disappearance as first order, the pre-exponential factor and activation energy, E, in the Arrhenius expression (eq. 35) can be obtained. These studies tend to confirm large activation energies typical of the bond mpture mechanism assumed earlier. However, an accelerating effect of the oxidant is also evident in some results, so that the thermal mpture mechanism probably overestimates the time requirement by as much as several orders of magnitude (39). Measurements at several levels of oxidant concentration are useful for determining how important it is to maintain spatial uniformity of oxidant concentration in the incinerator. 

---