Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Extinction sensitizer molecules

Bolis et al (43) reported volumetric data characterizing NH3 adsorption on TS-1 that demonstrate that the number of NH3 molecules adsorbed per Ti atom under saturation conditions was close to two, suggesting that virtually all Ti atoms are involved in the adsorption and have completed a 6-fold coordination Ti(NH3)204. The reduction of the tetrahedral symmetry of Ti4+ ions in the silicalite framework upon adsorption of NH3 or H20 is also documented by a blue shift of the Ti-sensitive stretching band at 960 cm-1 (43,45,134), by a decrease of the intensity of the XANES pre-edge peak at 4967 eV (41,43,134), and by the extinction of the resonance Raman enhancement of the 1125 cm-1 band in UV-Raman spectra (39,41). As an example, spectra in Figs. 15 and 16 show the effect of adsorbed water on the UV-visible (Fig. 15), XANES (Fig. 16a), and UV-Raman (Fig. 16b) spectra of TS-1. [Pg.54]

To date, all LSPR nanosensor experiments have been performed using non-resonant molecules. Because the effect that molecular resonances have on nanoparticle sensing is unknown, my current studies are aimed at answering this question (Objective 6). Preliminary results indicate that the resonant molecule, Fe(bpy)3 + (bpy = 4,4 -bipyri-dine), dramatically enhances the sensitivity of the LSPR nanosensor when the extinction maximum of the nanoparticles is slightly red-shifted from the molecular resonance. [Pg.362]

Preliminary results indicate that the resonant molecule, Feibpyjj " (bpy = 4,4 -bipyridine), dramatically enhances the sensitivity of the LSPR nanosensor when the extinction maximum of the nanoparticles is slightly red-shifted from the molecular resonance. [Pg.365]

The -organometallics show a reactivity pattern typical of an alkene bound weakly to a metal center. The moiety may be displaced easily by a variety of donor ligands such as CO or PR3 (R = OMe, Ph), and indeed many of the complexes are very air and water sensitive. Reactions can be monitored easily by the color change from the intense red or green of the adduct to the characteristic purple color of the free C60 molecule the other products tend to have much lower extinction coefficients [Eqs. (11) and (12)] (15, 26). [Pg.35]

Reduction of flavin by two electrons yields the 1,5-dihydroflavin (Scheme 3), often called reduced flavin . Since isomeric two-electron reduced flavin structures are known (cf. below), the term reduced flavin should be avoided unless defined to prevent misunderstanding. From all flavin species possible in a redox reaction the solution of 1,5-dihydroflavin is, in contrast to that of some isomeric compounds, devoid of a stront colour but not colourless as indicated by the term leucoflavin , which is still used (Table 4). The only true colourless species is (77). Because of the very high oxygen-sensitivity of 1,5-dihydroflavin its chemical and physical properties were investigated only recently Long before crystallographic data on flavins were available, conclusions were drawn from the molar extinction coefficient at 450 nm of 1,5-dihydroflavins with respect to the planarity of the molecules. From the data presented in Table 5 it was proposed that anionic... [Pg.86]

Ultraviolet and visible absorption spectroscopy has been a powerful aid to studies of free radicals in the gas phase but is of less value in the solid phase because of line broadening and consequent lack of resolution. Under suitable conditions, however, solid state infrared spectra can give information on the structure of free radicals and on the forces holding the constituent atoms in their equilibrium positions. The technique is less sensitive than e.s.r. because the extinction coefficients of vibrational transitions are generally low but the ability to observe non-para-magnetic molecules in addition to free radicals is sometimes advantageous. [Pg.38]

Condition 3. The molecule to be sensitized, S, should not absorb at the same wavelength used for exciting M. Since one will be dealing with discrete and unresolved complex spectra, the rigorous use of Beer s law, even if it is apparently obeyed by both substances, to determine fractions absorbed by each gas in a mixture is unreliable. If the extinction coefficient of M is much larger than that of S, useful results can still sometimes be obtained. [Pg.61]

On the other hand, in the excitation spectrum, the emission intensity 4, at the monitored emission band, is plotted as a function of the wavelength A of the excitation light, w hich varies as the extinction coefficient of the absorbing molecules. Therefore, the excitation spectrum exhibits the same spectral appearance as that of the absorption spectrum. The advantage of measuring the excitation spectrum in addition to the emission spectrum is the greater sensitivity even for low concentrations of photoluminescent material compared to standard absorption measurements. [Pg.134]

Table I, provided yet another instrumental approach for balloon experiments intended to measure the extinction of solar radiation by stratospheric aerosol. Spectrometer 4, Table I, based on the use of a pyroelectric vidicon image device, was developed to measure the strong absorption bands of non-isonuclear molecules ( 2-5 ym range). Recently we have developed spectrometer 5, Table I, based on the use of a self-scanned solid state pyroelectric array sensor. The main advantages of this sensor, over the pyroelectric vidicon, are its improved sensitivity and reduced channel-to-channel cross-talk. Table I, provided yet another instrumental approach for balloon experiments intended to measure the extinction of solar radiation by stratospheric aerosol. Spectrometer 4, Table I, based on the use of a pyroelectric vidicon image device, was developed to measure the strong absorption bands of non-isonuclear molecules ( 2-5 ym range). Recently we have developed spectrometer 5, Table I, based on the use of a self-scanned solid state pyroelectric array sensor. The main advantages of this sensor, over the pyroelectric vidicon, are its improved sensitivity and reduced channel-to-channel cross-talk.
The most common practice is to use an extinction coefficient of 1.0 when the purity and characteristics of the molecule are being determined. The sensitivity is typically in the range of 0.05 1.0 mg/mL, and one must be aware of the fact that impurities, particularly those that contain aromatic side chains, may lead to inaccuracies. Further interference that can skew results may be encountered with pigments, organic cofactors, and phenolic constituents of the solution. In addition, the extinction coefficient for a protein is pH dependent. On the whole, this approach is the most common one in use and although it can only be expected to yield an estimate of the true concentration, sometimes this is the best that can be done. [Pg.253]


See other pages where Extinction sensitizer molecules is mentioned: [Pg.318]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.772]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.348]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.229 ]




SEARCH



Extinction

Sensitizing molecule

© 2024 chempedia.info