Evolving Paths of Learning

The purpose of this overview is to provide a broad picture of the commercializing of the products of the new chemical and biological technologies. It does so by relating enterprise-level developments—particularly expansion, diversification, and restructuring—as well as macroeconomic events and eras. In this way, the transformation of new scientific knowledge into prodncts that have so revolntionized daily life and work over the past century can be properly explained. 

For the chemical industry, the key events and eras following the industry s launch in the 1880s during the Second Industrial Revolution began with the impact of World War I, during which the United States ceased importing German products and developed domestic industrial capabilities and 

Of the multisectored core companies listed in Table 1.1, all except Allied Chemical were American first movers in products based on new chemical technologies. Du Pont, Dow, Monsanto, and American Cyanamid established their initial learning bases between 1896 and 1907. Du Pont was the first mover in nitrocellulose-based explosives, Dow in electrically produced inorganic chemicals, and Monsanto in the synthesis of foods and flavors. The several companies that in 1917 made up Union Carbide had also pioneered in a range of electrically based inorganic products. On the other hand, only one of the enterprises that merged into Allied commercialized a new technology. 

The American Chemical Industry during the Interwar Years 

The focused companies usually adopted one of two growth strategies. 

---

As before, I conclude this chapter by relating the evolving paths of learning of the four companies under discussion to the book s three basic themes— barriers to entry, defining strategic boundaries, and limits to growth. 

From their beginnings, the product lines of Dow and Du Pont evolved along entirely different paths of learning. After it moved beyond the nitrocellulose path in the 1920s, Du Pont became a multisectored core chemical company primarily through acquisition and then commercializing of high-end prod-... 

The paths of learning of the two remaining focused companies evolved in a very different manner than those of the other eight. Cabot was a 125-year-... 

Conceptually, a learning community is a group of people committed to a path of inquiry and action who engage in face-to-face and online activities over an extended period of time and evolve and learn from one another. We envision that the four main dimensions of a successful learning community are comfort, trust, responsibility, and spontaneity with flexible boundaries. Logistically, the two courses are linked through an integrative seminar and the same cohort of students attends each course and the Seminar. 

Underneath the evolntion of process and technology are the stories of people. It is abont individuals who never dreamed that they would spend their careers in snpply chain management. For these pioneers there were no yellow brick roads, or clear paths. Instead, they stumbled forward. These pioneers learned lessons through doing. Slowly, the processes evolved. And as they evolved, the pioneers transformed supply chain processes brick by brick. 

From the perspective of education reform, how have these school-community initiatives influenced teaching and learning They follow an evolutionary path Beginning with parent participation, they move to affecting the school environment and eventually influence school policies and classroom instruction (Melaville, 1998, p. 93). Most initiatives have only recently evolved to the point where they are in a position to influence school policies and classroom instruction. They are beginning to make more explicit connections with the school day to become true community partners in the educational process. 

---