Event-forming operations

Our concern is with whether quantification is an event-forming operation. The point to note here, once again, is just that NRP theorists owe us an argument for the claim that it is. It would not do for them just to point out that we can cite functional properties in causal explanations. As we... 

I will speak of NRP theorists as taking functional properties to be constitutive properties of events. Alternatively, we could say that they take functional properties to be essential properties of events in either Lewis s or Yablo s (1992b) sense of essential properties of events, for Yablo s property exemplification account of events also allows for events with functional essences. By a functional event token, I will henceforth mean a second-order (or higher-order) event token, an event with a functional property as a constitutive property (or an event with a functional essence). Notice that although this role-functionalist view of event tokens does not treat quantification as an object-forming operation, it treats it as a particularforming operation, for events are particulars. 

If we embrace an abundant conception of properties, then there is a substantive question of which properties are such that they are constitutive properties of events. For example, if disjunction is a property-forming operation, and so there are disjunctive properties, it by no means follows that disjunctive properties can be constitutive properties of events. Also, even if complementation is a property-forming operation, and so there are negative properties, it is a nontrivial question whether negative properties can be constitutive properties of events — whether, that is, omissions are events. 1 will recur to these matters later. The point to note for now is that on an abundant conception of properties, no extant property exemplification account of events counts literally every property as such that it can be a constitutive (or essential) property of an event. One might embrace quantification as a property-forming operation but reject it as an eventforming operation and so reject the claim that functional properties can be constitutive properties of events. Whether functional properties can be constitutive properties of events, and so whether there are functional events in the sense in question, is a controversial issue. The issue, moreover, as I see, is inseparable from the issue of whether such entities would be causes. 

The main idea that I am challenging is that a regularity theory should try to accommodate functional events as causes. Thus, I myself would not object to Melnyk s account of causation on the grounds that it renders functional events epiphenomena. I would recommend not countenancing functional events — events with constitutive functional properties. Even if quantification is a property-forming operation, there seems to me no good reason to think that it is an event-forming one. 

Approach to restoring of stresses SD in the three-dimensional event requires for each pixel determinations of matrix with six independent elements. Type of matrixes depends on chosen coordinate systems. It is arised a question, how to present such result for operator that he shall be able to value stresses and their SD. One of the possible ways is a calculation and a presenting in the form of image of SD of stresses tensor invariants. For three-dimensional SDS relative increase of time of spreading of US waves, polarized in directions of main axises of stresses tensor ... 

To distinguish between a review and an audit, some definitions will be provided. A review is a critical examination or evaluation of any operation, procedure, condition, event, or equipment item. Reviews can take many forms and be identified as project reviews, design reviews, safety reviews, pre-start-up reviews, and so on. The following discussion of the review process will deal with project reviews associated with capital projects and focus on the area of process safety. 

Metal surfaces in a well-designed, well-operated cooling water system will establish an equilibrium with the environment by forming a coating of protective corrosion product. This covering effectively isolates the metal from the environment, thereby stifling additional corrosion. Any mechanical, chemical, or chemical and mechanical condition that affects the ability of the metal to form and maintain this protective coating can lead to metal deterioration. Erosion-corrosion is a classic example of a chemical and mechanical condition of this type. A typical sequence of events is ... 

The press had been designed with a capacity to deliver 280 kN press force and to work at a production rate of 40 lids per minute. Calculations to determine the distribution of forming loads required indicated that the press capacity was adequate to form the family of steel lids to be produced on the machine. One of the major areas of interest in the design was the con-rod and pin (see Figure 4.66). The first option considered was based on a previous design where the con-rod was manufactured from cast iron with phosphor bronze bearings at the big and small ends. However, weaknesses in this approach necessitated the consideration of other options. The case study presents the analysis of the pin and con-rod using simple probabilistic techniques in an attempt to provide in-service reliable press operation. The way a weak link was introduced to ensure ease of maintenance and repair in the event... 

Determining which accident sequences lead to which states requires a thorough knowledge of plant and process operations, and previous safety analyses of the plant such as, for nuclear plants, in Chapter 15 of their FSAR. These states do not form a continuum but cluster about specific situations, each with characteristic releases. The maximum number of damage states for a two-branch event trees is 2 where S is the number of systems along the top of the event tree. For example, if there are 10 systems there are 2 = 1,024 end-states. This is true for an "unpruned" event tree, but. in reality, simpler trees result from nodes being bypassed for physical reasons. An additional simplification results... 

A burner which utilises a mixture of fuel and oxidant gases and which is attached to a waste vessel (liquid trap) should be provided with a U-shaped connection between the trap and the burner chamber. The head of liquid in the connecting tube should be greater than the operating pressure of the burner if this is not achieved, mixtures of fuel and oxidant gas may be vented to the atmosphere and form an explosive mixture. The trap should be made of a material that will not shatter in the event of an explosive flash-back in the burner chamber. 

In the sonochemical reactors, selection of suitable operating parameters such as the intensity and the frequency of ultrasound and the vapor pressure of the cavitating media is an essential factor as the bubble behavior and hence the yields of sonochemical transformation are significantly altered due to these parameters. It is necessary that both the frequency and intensity of irradiation should not be increased beyond an optimum value, which is also a function of the type of the application and the equipment under consideration. The liquid phase physicochemical properties should be adjusted in such a way that generation of cavitation events is eased and also large number of smaller size cavities are formed in the system. 

---