Evaluate Analytical Options

This section is concerned with consideration of the various tools of the trade discussed in previous chapters (particularly Chapters 4—6) in the context of a new analytical task. Considering the nature of the analyte 

It is also important at an early stage to recognize the possibihty that the laboratory does not possess the necessary equipment and/or capabilities. The client will need to know about this one way or another as early as possible. 

---

Linear least-squares analysis is quite easy with Excel. This type of analysis can be accomplished in several ways by using the equations presented in this chapter, by employing the basic built-in functions of Excel, or by using the regression data analysis tool. Because the built-in functions are the easiest of these options, we explore them in detail here and see how they may be used to evaluate analytical data. 

The SNMS instrumentation that has been most extensively applied and evaluated has been of the electron-gas type, combining ion bombardment by a separate ion beam and by direct plasma-ion bombardment, coupled with postionization by a low-pressure RF plasma. The direct bombardment electron-gas SNMS (or SNMSd) adds a distinctly different capability to the arsenal of thin-film analytical techniques, providing not only matrbe-independent quantitation, but also the excellent depth resolution available from low-energy sputterii. It is from the application of SNMSd that most of the illustrations below are selected. Little is lost in this restriction, since applications of SNMS using the separate bombardment option have been very limited to date. 

Reliable analytical methods are available for determination of many volatile nitrosamines at concentrations of 0.1 to 10 ppb in a variety of environmental and biological samples. Most methods employ distillation, extraction, an optional cleanup step, concentration, and final separation by gas chromatography (GC). Use of the highly specific Thermal Energy Analyzer (TEA) as a GC detector affords simplification of sample handling and cleanup without sacrifice of selectivity or sensitivity. Mass spectrometry (MS) is usually employed to confirm the identity of nitrosamines. Utilization of the mass spectrometer s capability to provide quantitative data affords additional confirmatory evidence and quantitative confirmation should be a required criterion of environmental sample analysis. Artifactual formation of nitrosamines continues to be a problem, especially at low levels (0.1 to 1 ppb), and precautions must be taken, such as addition of sulfamic acid or other nitrosation inhibitors. The efficacy of measures for prevention of artifactual nitrosamine formation should be evaluated in each type of sample examined. 

The evaluation of all NADA analytical methods was previously conducted exclusively by the CVM. Since 1995, the CVM has offered sponsors of NADA residue methods the option of conducting the method trial through a Sponsor Monitored Method Trial (SMMT) process. The SMMT is conducted according to CVM specifications with CVM oversight. The resultant performance data must be reviewed and judged acceptable by CVM before the method is approved. 

Another possibility is to immobilise enzymes either on the sensor element itself or in the vicinity of the sensing element. The operation principle is in most cases a semi-continuous spectral difference measurement in combination with a kinetic data evaluation. A sample containing the analyte of interest is recorded by the sensor immediately after contact with the sample and again after a certain time. Provided that no other changes in the composition of the sample occur over time, the spectral differences between the two measurements are characteristic for the analyte (and the metabolic products of the enzymatic reaction) and can quantitatively evaluated. Provided that suitable enzymes are available that can be immobilised, this may be a viable option to build a sensor, in particular when the enzymatic reaction can not (easily) be monitored otherwise, e.g. by production or consumption of oxygen or a change of pH. In any case, the specific properties and stumbling blocks related to enzymatic systems must be observed (see chapter 16). 

Despite the obvious merit of this conventional wisdom, selectivity wild cards often prove essential, and there is real value in developing a repertoire of special weapons and tactics. Even though there is no way to predict which, if any, will produce the effect you seek, the options are limited, well defined, and the investment of resources reasonably modest. By the time you get to the point of evaluating wild cards, you will probably be sufficiently familiar with your analytical system to discern a useful result from a chromatogram without extensive secondary testing. The principal investment will be buffer preparation and the time to run the analyses. 

Referee Laboratories and Spike Recovery Testing. Outside laboratories, with demonstrated performance records, can be used to evaluate the suitability of a candidate method when none of the other accuracy testing options is feasible. However, This technique provides a very weak form of accuracy assessment. Indeed, it provides a comparability check, not an accuracy measure. Similarly, spike recovery tests provide only weak evidence of method accuracy. Quantitative spike recovery only indicates that the added form of the analyte was recovered. If the added form responds differently toward sample preparation or detection the utility of spike recovery testing remains doubtful. 

To facilitate adoption or approval of a PAT process, manufacturers may request a preoperational review of a PAT manufacturing facility and process by the PAT team by contacting the FDA Process Analytical Technology Team at PAT cder.fda. gov. ft should be noted that when certain PAT implementation plans neither affect the current process nor require a change in specifications, several options can be considered. Manufacturers should evaluate and discuss with the agency the most appropriate option for their situation. 

If an ALMERA member wants to keep the evaluation result of his/her participation anonymous, he/she will have the option to only take part in the IAEA world-wide open proficiency test. In this case, his/her results will not be included in the ALMERA report. In addition, the statistical approach used to evaluate the analytical results of the ALMERA network proficiency test will be adapted in the future to take the reporting time into consideration. 

The amount of nonbound analyte can be quantified directly, especially if it contains a strong chromophore, fluorophore, or isotope label. Alternatively, it can be postlabeled or the evaluation can take place in a competitive or displacement assay format using a labeled probe.3132 A final option is to incorporate a signaling group in the imprinted site leading to a chromogenic response reflecting the amount of bound analyte.3334... 

---