European Medicines Agency authorization applications

It is worthwhile to note that, in the US, where the applicant will just be dealing with a single authority, there is no need to re-submit data that was previously submitted as part of an IN D application to conduct clinical trials. Instead, the applicant can cross-reference the IND file. This does not apply in Europe, because clinical trial applications will have been submitted to individual Competent Authorities, whereas marketing authorisation applications are usually submitted either centrally to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) or collectively to a number of Competent Authorities. Thus, the files need to be self-supporting. 

An application is submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). The EMEA evaluates the application and forwards its opinion (positive or negative for granting of a marketing authorization) to the European Commis-... 

Council Regulation 726/2004/EC (updates and expands the previous regulation 239/1993/EC), which mainly concerns the duties of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), establishment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), and the scope and mechanisms of the centralized procedure for marketing authorization applications (MAAs) and pharmacovigilance issues. 

Centralized Procedure (CP) This is the procedure of most interest for biopharmaceuticals, as this is the mandatory route for review and approval of such drugs in the European Union. In the centralized procedure a single application is submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). A variety of presubmission activities, starting six months before the intended start date of the centralized procedure, are required [8], Two initial assessments by a Rapporteur and Co-rapporteur national authorities (one from each of two member states chosen by the EMEA) are made, leading to Day 80 Critical Assessment Reports. A consolidated list of questions (LoQ) is provided to the applicant at Day 120 when there is a clock stop, normally of three months, to allow the preparation and submission of responses. Following satisfactory negotiation of other steps in the procedure, the Committee on Human Medicinal Products will recommend authorization at Day 210, with authorization by the Commission at Day 277. 

In 1996 and 1997 the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) published guidelines for analytical method validation [18]. These documents present a discussion of the characteristics for consideration during the validation of the analytical procedures included as part of registration applications submitted within the European Union, Japan, and the United States. Regulatory agencies have emitted documents, largely inspired by ICH documents. It is the case of the FDA [19, 20], the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [21,24], and the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority [25], to name just a few. 

On 8 September 2008 the European Medicines Agency announced that Takeda, the manufacturers of ramelteon, had withdrawn its application for marketing authorization for ramelteon for the treatment of primary insomnia in patients over the age of 18 years with a view to extending its clinical programme to address outstanding questions on the benefit to harm balance this followed a negative recommendation from the regulators in June 2008 [131. ... 

This is the name of what we used to know simply as the data sheet, or colloquially as the package insert. The SPC is the document that must be submitted in draft by companies to the MHRA/Reference Member State/European Medicines Evaluation Agency upon application for a marketing authorisation and, once approved, must then be provided to prescribers or suppliers of medicines, either with the product or at the time of promotion or within the previous 15 months of promotion of the product, written or verbal. The SPC includes the prescribing information for the product and represents the product licence approval for the medicine (see Section 12.2.1.1). It is the definitive statement between the competent authority and the company and, more importantly, is becoming the common basis of communication between the... 

In this context, it is also essential to build in regulatory compliance wherever possible. This is particularly important in markets such as the bio-pharmaceutical industry, where the auditability requirements of regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US or the European Medicines Authority (EMA) will need to be taken into account for many applications. Forward planning of this form can result in a market edge over more technology-focused competitors. 

A central EEC registration authority (European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products) will be established and "shall take up its responsibilities on 1 January 1995 (Council Directive 2309/93 of 22 July 1993). The Committee on Proprietary Medicinal Products, CPMP, which consists of members of the Commission and from the states authorities, plays a central role in the existing and future system. It is assisted by different working parties for specific areas. The CPMP coordinates the procedures, assesses applications and provides "opinion reports" and acts as arbitrator in the case of national discrepancies. However, the opinion reports and decisions of the CPMP are not (yet) binding to the member states. For veterinary products identical rules apply here a CVMP acts as the central body. 

---