Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ethanol fermentation byproducts

Coproducts - The potentially useful byproducts of ethanol fermentation process. [Pg.329]

Table VI shows the results of the three continuous fermentations completed with the r424A organism. The carbon source in the fermentation media was corn fiber hydrolysate produced by the initial hydrolysis method followed by secondary acid hydrolysis. The yeast metabolized over 60% of the total carbohydrates with a g ethanol/g carbohydrate yield between 0.50 and 0.55. The lower percentage of total carbohydrates metabolized is likely due to the continuous fermentation method, as shake flask fermentations, albeit at lower dry solids, metabolized up to 91% of the carbohydrates (unpublished data). The carbohydrate utilization will be optimized in future fermentations. The g/g yield is near theoretical, therefore the metabolized carbohydrate is converted solely to ethanol. The organic acids, ethanol and dextrose concentrations for a sample fermentation are shown in Figure 1. The ethanol concentration in the fermentor at the end of the run was 55g/L. The concentrations of the citric acid, lactic acid and glycerol increase substantially during the fermentation, which are normal byproducts of the ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The volume of the fermentation was doubled with hydrolysate fed into the fermentor. These fermentations show that the organism can ferment the glucose and xylose from the corn fiber hydrolysate to ethanol without detoxification of the hydrolysate. The fermentation conditions were not optimized, so additional improvement in the fermentation is expected. Table VI shows the results of the three continuous fermentations completed with the r424A organism. The carbon source in the fermentation media was corn fiber hydrolysate produced by the initial hydrolysis method followed by secondary acid hydrolysis. The yeast metabolized over 60% of the total carbohydrates with a g ethanol/g carbohydrate yield between 0.50 and 0.55. The lower percentage of total carbohydrates metabolized is likely due to the continuous fermentation method, as shake flask fermentations, albeit at lower dry solids, metabolized up to 91% of the carbohydrates (unpublished data). The carbohydrate utilization will be optimized in future fermentations. The g/g yield is near theoretical, therefore the metabolized carbohydrate is converted solely to ethanol. The organic acids, ethanol and dextrose concentrations for a sample fermentation are shown in Figure 1. The ethanol concentration in the fermentor at the end of the run was 55g/L. The concentrations of the citric acid, lactic acid and glycerol increase substantially during the fermentation, which are normal byproducts of the ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The volume of the fermentation was doubled with hydrolysate fed into the fermentor. These fermentations show that the organism can ferment the glucose and xylose from the corn fiber hydrolysate to ethanol without detoxification of the hydrolysate. The fermentation conditions were not optimized, so additional improvement in the fermentation is expected.
Butyl alcohol can be obtained from carbohydrates (such as molasses and grain) by fermentation. Acetone and ethanol are also produced. Synthetic processes account for the majority of current-day production. Propylene and synthesis gas give -butyl alcohol. Isobutyl alcohol is a byproduct. [Pg.227]

This type of autocatalytic reaction is a simplification of many biological reactions such as fermentation, where the reaction produces products (species B in the previous example), which accelerates the rate. In fermentation, yeast cells in the solution produce enzymes that catalyze the decomposition of sugar to produce ethanol as a byproduct of yeast reproduction. Since the yeast population increases as the reaction proceeds, the enzyme concentration increases, and the process appears to be autocatalytic. A highly simplified description of fermentation might be... [Pg.114]

Computer] In fermentation processes sugar (AJ is converted to ethanol (C) as a byproduct of yeast (B) reproduction. In a simple model we can represent this process as... [Pg.139]

Tills is generally associated with the familiar alcoholic fermentation in which theoretically 100 parts of glucose are converted to 51.1 parts of ethyl alcohol (ethanol). 48.9 parts of carbon dioxide (CO/i. and heat. In addition, however, the anaerobic reaction also yields minor byproducts in small amounts—mainly glycerol, succinic acid, higher alcohols (fusel oil), 2,3-butanediol, and traces of acetaldehyde, acetic acid, and lactic acid. Fusel oil is a mixture of alcohols, including -propyl, -butyl, isobutyl, amyl, and isoamyl alcohols. [Pg.1768]

The use of recombinant microorganisms for cofermentation is one of the most promising approaches in the field of bioethanol production, though their use for large-scale industrial processes still requires fine-tuning of the reliability of the entire process (2). The technical hurdles of cofermentation increase when real biomass hydrolysates have to be fermented. In fact, whatever the biomass pretreatment, the formation of degradation byproducts that could inhibit the fermentation usually requires the addition of a further detoxification step. Therefore, the production of ethanol from hydrolysates should be considered in its entirety, from the optimal pretreatment to the choice of the proper fermentation process. [Pg.540]

Corn steep liquor (CSL), a byproduct of the com wet-milling process, was used in an immobilized cell continuous biofilm reactor to replace the expensive P2 medium ingredients. The use of CSL resulted in the production of 6.29 g/L of total acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) as compared with 6.86 g/L in a control experiment. These studies were performed at a dilution rate of 0.32 hr1. The productivities in the control and CSL experiment were 2.19 and 2.01 g/(Lh), respectively. Although the use of CSL resulted in a 10% decrease in productivity, it is viewed that its application would be economical compared to P2 medium. Hence, CSL may be used to replace the P2 medium. It was also demonstrated that inclusion of butyrate into the feed was beneficial to the butanol fermentation. A control experiment produced 4.77 g/L of total ABE, and the experiment with supplemented sodium butyrate produced 5.70 g/L of total ABE. The butanol concentration increased from 3.14 to 4.04 g/L. Inclusion of acetate in the feed medium of the immobilized cell biofilm reactor was not found to be beneficial for the ABE fermentation, as reported for the batch ABE fermentation. [Pg.713]

Romani et al. (2011) also evaluated the yeast population dynamics and fermentation kinetics, and their influences on the analytical profiles of Vin Santo obtained at industrial scale utilizing in separate trials two non-Saccharomyces yeasts, T. delbrueckii and Z. bailii. These results were compared with those obtained both with spontaneous fermentation and with an inoculum of a S. cerevisiae yeast strain. The standard kinetics of fermentations were observed in all of the trials, also if a higher fermentation rate was observed in the trials inoculated with S. cerevisiae compared to those inoculated with the two non-Saccharomyces yeasts, and in the spontaneous one. A rapid decrease in non-Saccharomyces yeast was observed in the trials inoculated with S. cerevisiae. In these last ones, after 6 months, 18.4% ethanol was reached versus 16% of the trials inoculated with the non-Saccharomyces strains. No substantial differences were seen for the higher alcohols or other byproducts assayed. [Pg.88]

Irrespective of the type of biomass used for ethanol production, the biomass needs to be pretreated to make the carbohydrates available for fermentation. However, which enzymes can be used depends on the source of the biomass. In addition, the biomass needs pretreatment before the enzymes are used. The first step of the pretreatment can be of a physical nature. Once the biomass is physically pretreated, the cellulose structures are open for enzyme action. In biomass from forests, the substance is mainly in the form of cellulose. Targeted enzymes are selective for the reaction of cellulose to glucose, and therefore there are no degradation byproducts, as occurs in acid conversion technology. There are at least three ways this can be performed. Firstly, in separate hydrolysis and fermentation, the pretreated biomass is treated with cellulase, which hydrolyzes the cellulose to glucose at 50 °C and pH 4.8. Secondly, in simultaneous fermentation and saccharification (SSF) the hydrolysis and fermentation take place in the same bioreactor. Thirdly,... [Pg.152]

The production of ethanol by yeasts is characterized by high selectivity and low formation of byproducts. The main variables describing the fermentation process are substrate (sugar) concentration, tolerance to ethanol, temperature, pH and oxygen. These effects are briefly reviewed. [Pg.440]

The pH affects the ethanol production rate, yeast growth, byproduct formation and bacterial contamination. Sugar fermentation by yeast is relatively insensitive... [Pg.440]

One strategy to minimize ethanol production cost is to run simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, or SSF, which would utilize ethanologens engineered to operate in high-temperature environments. Also, the fermentation organism s ability to utilize C5 sugars derived from the hemicellulose component, and have acceptable productivities in the presence of numerous byproducts of the... [Pg.1384]

Continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) have been routinely employed for producer gas fermentations. A two-stage reactor system has also been used to maximize ethanol production and minimize the formation of byproducts. Carbon monoxide and hydrogen conversions of 90% and 70%, respectively, were observed in the first reactor, while they were about 70% and 10% in the second reactor. High ethanol-to-acetate ratios were achieved by the use of such a dual reactor system. Bubble colunms are also commonly used for industrial fermentations. A comparative study was performed between a CSTR and a bubble column reactor for CO fermentation using Peptostreptococcus productus. Higher conversion rates of CO were observed with the bubble column without the use of any additional agitation. Producer gas fermentation with packed bubble colunms and trickle bed reactors has also been studied. The trickle bed reactor has a low pressure drop and liquid hold-up, and the conversion rates were the highest compared to CSTRs and bubble columns. [Pg.149]

The incorporation of acetaldehyde derived bridges between anthocyanins and flavan-3-ols via acetaldehyde condensation reactions has been well described in fermented beverages such as red wine. The presence of acetaldehyde in alcoholic solutions is attributed to either oxidatative products of ethanol or microbial byproducts. In the case of cranbeny fruit and spray dried juice neither product was subjected to yeast fermentation. It becomes a concern then that die observed anthocyanin-pigments may be an arti ct of harvest, storage, juice processing or analytic techniques. [Pg.241]


See other pages where Ethanol fermentation byproducts is mentioned: [Pg.446]    [Pg.1362]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.3221]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.119]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Byproducts

Ethanol fermentation

© 2024 chempedia.info