Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equation interface

The capillary pressure can be related to the height of the interface above the level at which the capillary pressure is zero (called the free water level) by using the hydrostatic pressure equation. Assuming the pressure at the free water level is PI ... [Pg.122]

It was made clear in Chapter II that the surface tension is a definite and accurately measurable property of the interface between two liquid phases. Moreover, its value is very rapidly established in pure substances of ordinary viscosity dynamic methods indicate that a normal surface tension is established within a millisecond and probably sooner [1], In this chapter it is thus appropriate to discuss the thermodynamic basis for surface tension and to develop equations for the surface tension of single- and multiple-component systems. We begin with thermodynamics and structure of single-component interfaces and expand our discussion to solutions in Sections III-4 and III-5. [Pg.48]

Two simulation methods—Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics—allow calculation of the density profile and pressure difference of Eq. III-44 across the vapor-liquid interface [64, 65]. In the former method, the initial system consists of N molecules in assumed positions. An intermolecule potential function is chosen, such as the Lennard-Jones potential, and the positions are randomly varied until the energy of the system is at a minimum. The resulting configuration is taken to be the equilibrium one. In the molecular dynamics approach, the N molecules are given initial positions and velocities and the equations of motion are solved to follow the ensuing collisions until the set shows constant time-average thermodynamic properties. Both methods are computer intensive yet widely used. [Pg.63]

We have considered the surface tension behavior of several types of systems, and now it is desirable to discuss in slightly more detail the very important case of aqueous mixtures. If the surface tensions of the separate pure liquids differ appreciably, as in the case of alcohol-water mixtures, then the addition of small amounts of the second component generally results in a marked decrease in surface tension from that of the pure water. The case of ethanol and water is shown in Fig. III-9c. As seen in Section III-5, this effect may be accounted for in terms of selective adsorption of the alcohol at the interface. Dilute aqueous solutions of organic substances can be treated with a semiempirical equation attributed to von Szyszkowski [89,90]... [Pg.67]

As an example, Tajima and co-workers [108] used labeling to obtain the adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate at the solution-air interface. The results, illustrated in Fig. Ill-12, agreed very well with the Gibbs equation in the form... [Pg.77]

Smith [113] studied the adsorption of n-pentane on mercury, determining both the surface tension change and the ellipsometric film thickness as a function of the equilibrium pentane pressure. F could then be calculated from the Gibbs equation in the form of Eq. ni-106, and from t. The agreement was excellent. Ellipsometry has also been used to determine the surface compositions of solutions [114,115], as well polymer adsorption at the solution-air interface [116]. [Pg.78]

If the surface tension of a liquid is lowered by the addition of a solute, then, by the Gibbs equation, the solute must be adsorbed at the interface. This adsorption may amount to enough to correspond to a monomolecular layer of solute on the surface. For example, the limiting value of in Fig. Ill-12 gives an area per molecule of 52.0 A, which is about that expected for a close-packed... [Pg.80]

The succeeding material is broadly organized according to the types of experimental quantities measured because much of the literature is so grouped. In the next chapter spread monolayers are discussed, and in later chapters the topics of adsorption from solution and of gas adsorption are considered. Irrespective of the experimental compartmentation, the conclusions as to the nature of mobile adsorbed films, that is, their structure and equations of state, will tend to be of a general validity. Thus, only a limited discussion of Gibbs monolayers has been given here, and none of such related aspects as the contact potentials of solutions or of adsorption at liquid-liquid interfaces, as it is more efficient to treat these topics later. [Pg.92]

A film at low densities and pressures obeys the equations of state described in Section III-7. The available area per molecule is laige compared to the cross-sectional area. The film pressure can be described as the difference in osmotic pressure acting over a depth, r, between the interface containing the film and the pure solvent interface [188-190]. [Pg.131]

Assume that an aqueous solute adsorbs at the mercury-water interface according to the Langmuir equation x/xm = bc/( + be), where Xm is the maximum possible amount and x/x = 0.5 at C = 0.3Af. Neglecting activity coefficient effects, estimate the value of the mercury-solution interfacial tension when C is Q.IM. The limiting molecular area of the solute is 20 A per molecule. The temperature is 25°C. [Pg.157]

Equation V-64 is that of a parabola, and electrocapillary curves are indeed approximately parabolic in shape. Because E ax tmd 7 max very nearly the same for certain electrolytes, such as sodium sulfate and sodium carbonate, it is generally assumed that specific adsorption effects are absent, and Emax is taken as a constant (-0.480 V) characteristic of the mercury-water interface. For most other electrolytes there is a shift in the maximum voltage, and is then taken to be Emax 0.480. Some values for the quantities are given in Table V-5 [113]. Much information of this type is due to Gouy [125], although additional results are to be found in most of the other references cited in this section. [Pg.199]

The equations of electrocapillarity become complicated in the case of the solid metal-electrolyte interface. The problem is that the work spent in a differential stretching of the interface is not equal to that in forming an infinitesimal amount of new surface, if the surface is under elastic strain. Couchman and co-workers [142, 143] and Mobliner and Beck [144] have, among others, discussed the thermodynamics of the situation, including some of the problems of terminology. [Pg.202]

Assume that a salt, MX (1 1 type), adsorbs at the mercury-water interface according to the Langmuir equation ... [Pg.217]

The importance of the solid-liquid interface in a host of applications has led to extensive study over the past 50 years. Certainly, the study of the solid-liquid interface is no easier than that of the solid-gas interface, and all the complexities noted in Section VIM are present. The surface structural and spectroscopic techniques presented in Chapter VIII are not generally applicable to liquids (note, however. Ref. 1). There is, perforce, some retreat to phenomenology, empirical rules, and semiempirical models. The central importance of the Young equation is evident even in its modification to treat surface heterogeneity or roughness. ... [Pg.347]

Ruch and Bartell [84], studying the aqueous decylamine-platinum system, combined direct estimates of the adsorption at the platinum-solution interface with contact angle data and the Young equation to determine a solid-vapor interfacial energy change of up to 40 ergs/cm due to decylamine adsorption. Healy (85) discusses an adsorption model for the contact angle in surfactant solutions and these aspects are discussed further in Ref. 86. [Pg.361]

Microcrystals of SrS04 of 30 A diameter have a solubility product at 25°C which is 6.4 times that for large crystals. Calculate the surface tension of the SrS04-H20 interface. Equating surface tension and surface energy, calculate the increase in heat of solution of this SrS04 powder in joules per mole. [Pg.380]

Thus, adding surfactants to minimize the oil-water and solid-water interfacial tensions causes removal to become spontaneous. On the other hand, a mere decrease in the surface tension of the water-air interface, as evidenced, say, by foam formation, is not a direct indication that the surfactant will function well as a detergent. The decrease in yow or ysw implies, through the Gibb s equation (see Section III-5) adsorption of detergent. [Pg.485]

The Nemst equation above for the dependence of the equilibrium potential of redox electrodes on the activity of solution species is also valid for uncharged species in the gas phase that take part in electron exchange reactions at the electrode-electrolyte interface. For the specific equilibrium process involved in the reduction of chlorine ... [Pg.600]


See other pages where Equation interface is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.597]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.572 ]




SEARCH



Equation at the interface

Gibbs-Duhem equation interface

Governing Equations and Boundary Conditions for a Translating Drop with Surfactant Adsorbed at the Interface

Integral equation formalism interfaces

Poisson-Boltzmann equation, interface between

Solution of Diffusion Equation Near an Interface

© 2024 chempedia.info