Enzymes multisubstrate mechanisms

Restricting ourselves to the rapid equilibrium approximation (as opposed to the steady-state approximation) and adopting the notation of Cleland [158 160], the most common enzyme-kinetic mechanisms are shown in Fig. 8. In multisubstrate reactions, the number of participating reactants in either direction is designated by the prefixes Uni, Bi, or Ter. As an example, consider the Random Bi Bi Mechanism, depicted in Fig. 8a. Following the derivation in Ref. [161], we assume that the overall reaction is described by vrbb = k+ [EAB — k EPQ. Using the conservation of total enzyme... 

MULTISUBSTRATE SYSTEMS. Wong and Hanes were probably among the first to suggest that alternative substrates may be useful in mechanistic studies. Fromm s laboratory was the first to use and extend the theory of alternative substrate inhibition to address specific questions about multisubstrate enzyme kinetic mechanisms. Huang demonstrated the advantages of a constant ratio approach when dealing with alternative substrate kinetics. 

An enzyme reaction scheme in which there are two substrates (A and B) and three products (P, Q, and R) and in which the substrates bind and the products are released in an ordered fashion. This reaction scheme is exemphfied by the malic enzyme The initial rate expression, in the absence of abortive complexes and products, is identical to the corresponding equation for the ordered Bi Bi mechanism. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms Ordered Bi Bi Mechanism... 

Adenylosuccinate lyase, malyl coenzyme A lyase , and NADase are reported to have this mechanism. It should also be recognized that the termed ordered Uni Bi is often used to refer to enzyme-catalyzed reactions which are actually ping pong Bi Bi mechanisms in which water is the second substrate. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Experiments designed to reach conclusions about an enzyme-catalyzed reaction by examining how one or more products of the reaction alter the kinetic behavior of the enzyme. The diagnostic value of these approaches can be limited by formation of E substrate product abortive complexes in multisubstrate mechanisms. 

A three-substrate, three-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which a particular substrate (B) has to bind second, but the other two substrates (A and C) can either bind first or third. Then, following the catalytic event, a particular product (Q) has to be the second product released, but the other two products (P and R) can be either the first or third product released. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

A two-substrate, two-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which either substrate, A or B, can bind first. However, the second substrate participates in a Theorell-Chance step in which either one of the two products is released. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

An enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which the two substrates (A and B) can bind in any order, resulting in the formation of a single product of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction (hence, this reaction is the reverse of the random Uni Bi mechanism). Usually the mechanism is distinguished as to being rapid equilibrium (/.c., the ratedetermining step is the central complex interconversion, EAB EP) or steady-state (in which the substrate addition and/or product release steps are rate-contributing). See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Multisubstrate or multiproduct enzyme-catalyzed reaction mechanisms in which one or more substrates and/ or products bind and/or are released in a random fashion. Note that this definition does not imply that there has to be an equal preference for any particular binding sequence. The flux through the different binding sequences could very easily be different. However, in rapid equilibrium random mechanisms, the flux rates are equivalent. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

A three-substrate, three-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which the three substrates (A, B, and C) and three products (P, Q, and R) can bind to and be released in any order. A number of enzymes have been reported to have this mechanism for example, adenylosuccinate synthetase , glutamate dehydrogenase, glutamine synthetase , formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase, and tubulin tyrosine ligase . See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Enzyme-catalyzed reaction schemes involving two or more substrates and/or two or more products in which there are no ping pong half-reaction steps. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Many other multisubstrate examples abound in metabolism. In effect, these situations are managed by realizing that the interaction of the enzyme with its many substrates can be treated as a series of uni- or bisubstrate steps in a multi-step reaction pathway. Thus, the complex mechanism of a multisubstrate reaction is resolved into a sequence of steps, each of which obeys the single- and double-displacement patterns just discussed. 

Similar to irreversible reactions, biochemical interconversions with only one substrate and product are mathematically simple to evaluate however, the majority of enzymes correspond to bi- or multisubstrate reactions. In this case, the overall rate equations can be derived using similar techniques as described above. However, there is a large variety of ways to bind and dissociate multiple substrates and products from an enzyme, resulting in a combinatorial number of possible rate equations, additionally complicated by a rather diverse notation employed within the literature. We also note that the derivation of explicit overall rate equation for multisubstrate reactions by means of the steady-state approximation is a tedious procedure, involving lengthy (and sometimes unintelligible) expressions in terms of elementary rate constants. See Ref. [139] for a more detailed discussion. Nonetheless, as the functional form of typical rate equations will be of importance for the parameterization of metabolic networks in Section VIII, we briefly touch upon the most common mechanisms. 

Symbols for substrates and products, respectively, in multisubstrate enzyme-catalyzed reactions. In all ordered reaction mechanisms, A represents the first substrate to bind, B is the second, eta, whereas P denotes the first product to be released, Q represents the second, eta See Cleland Nomenclature... 

Fromm first demonstrated how competitive inhibitors can be employed to distinguish the order of substrate binding for multisubstrate enzyme mechanisms. Each competitive inhibitor, with respect to one substrate, displays distinctive pattern(s) relative to the other substrate (s) . ... 

Data analysis flow chart, 240, 314-315 data point number requirements, 240, 314 determination of enzyme kinetic parameters multisubstrate, 240, 316-319 single substrate, 240, 314-316 enzyme mechanism testing, 240, 322 evaluation of binding processes, 240, 319321 file transfer protocol site, 240, 312 instructions for use, 240, 312-313. 

Fromm and Cleland provide valuable discussions of the utility of Haldane relations in excluding certain kinetic reaction mechanisms based on a numerical evaluation of the constants on each side of the equal sign in the Haldane relation. If the equality is maintained, the candidate mechanism is consistent with the observed rate parameter data. Obviously, one must be concerned about the quality of experimentally derived estimates of rate parameters, because chemists have frequently observed that thermodynamic data (such as equilibrium constants) are often more accurate and precise than kinetically derived parameters. See Haldane Relations for Multisubstrate Enzymes... 

Unconsumed substrates are treated as substrates or essential activators in deriving rate equations and studying detailed mechanisms. Nonetheless, one must indicate whether an unconsumed substrate (U) remains bound to the enzyme or not (in this case, U also becomes an unaltered product) in the reaction scheme. In practice, unconsumed substrates are likely to be involved in all the typical multisubstrate kinetic mechanisms Only one case is illustrated here, namely that the unconsumed substrate Su activates catalysis when bound in a rapid-equilibrium ordered mechanism ... 

A substrate analog will frequently inhibit only one of the two forms of a multisubstrate enzyme with a ping-pong mechanism.1 72 Reciprocal plots made for various inhibitor concentrations consist of a family of parallel lines reminiscent of uncompetitive inhibition. Observation of such parallel line plots can support a ping-pong mechanism for an enzyme but cannot prove it because in some cases parallel lines are observed for inhibition of enzymes acting by an ordered sequential mechanism. The following question arises naturally for any ordered bimolecular reaction (Eq. 9-43) Of the... 

The most common enzymatic reactions are those with two or more substrates and as many products. But many of the simpler single-substrate schemes are valuable for the development of kinetic ideas concerning effects of pH, temperature, etc., on enzyme reaction rates. Although the mechanisms of multisubstrate reactions are complicated, their kinetics can often be described by an equation of the form ... 

The mechanism by which multisubstrate, non-allosteric enzymes react can be divided into two major groups (i) sequential mechanisms, in which all reactants combine with the enzyme before the reaction occurs, and, (ii) a mechanism called ping-pong by Cleland (1970), in which release of some of the P occurs before all S have combined with the enzyme. 

The catalytic reaction of lipases follow the so called ping-pong bi-bi mechanism, a double displacement mechanism. This is a special multisubstrate reaction in which, for a two-substrate, two-product (i.e., bi-bi) system, an enzyme reacts with one substrate to form a product and a modified enzyme, the latter then reacting with a second substrate to form a second, final product, and regenerating the original enzyme (ping-pong). 

One can probably guess that in relation to reality, the reaction examples of the illustration or of equation (3-73) are much simplified. Many enzymes of known function catalyze reactions involving more than one substrate. The mechanisms can be quite complex, however, the rate laws do generally follow the form of equation (3-73) if the composition of only one substrate is varied at one time. A good discussion of such multisubstrate enzyme-catalyzed reactions is given by Plowman [K.M. Plowman, Enzyme Kinetics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, (1972)]. There is a strong family resemblance between these enzymatic sequences and those encountered in the detailed collision theory of Benson and Axworthy in Chapter 1. 

The Michaelis-Menten mechanism of enzyme activity models the enzyme with one active site that, weakly and reversibly, binds a substrate in homogeneous solution. It is a three-step mechanism. The first and second steps are the reversible formation of the enzyme-substrate complex (ES). The third step is the decay of the complex into the product. The steady-state approximation is applied to the concentration of the intermediate (ES) and its use simplifies the derivation of the final rate expression. However, the justification for the use of the approximation with this mechanism is suspect, in that both rate constants for the reversible steps may not be as large, in comparison to the rate constant for the decay to products, as they need to be for the approximation to be valid. The simplest form of the mechanism applies only when A h 2> k. Neverthele.ss, the form of the rate equation obtained does seem to match the principal experimental features of enzyme-catalyzed reactions it explains why there is a maximum in the reaction rate and provides a mechanistic understanding of the turnover number. The model may be expanded to include multisubstrate reaction rate and provides a mechanistic understanding of the turnover number. The model may be expanded to include multisubstrate reactions and inhibition. 

The earher recommendation of the Enz5nne Commission of the International Union of Biochemistry was that the Ks should be apphed for the Michaelis-Menten mechanism and Ku for the Briggs-Haldane mechanism (Enzyme Nomenclature, 1973) in this case, /Cm = Jfs + k /kf This practice must be discouraged because it leads to cumbersome and ambiguous expressions in multisubstrate reactions. 

---