Enzyme reactions steady state model, 80-1 concentration

A plot of the initial reaction rate, v, as a function of the substrate concentration [S], shows a hyperbolic relationship (Figure 4). As the [S] becomes very large and the enzyme is saturated with the substrate, the reaction rate will not increase indefinitely but, for a fixed amount of [E], it reaches a plateau at a limiting value named the maximal velocity (vmax). This behavior can be explained using the equilibrium model of Michaelis-Menten (1913) or the steady-state model of Briggs and Haldane (1926). The first one is based on the assumption that the rate of breakdown of the ES complex to yield the product is much slower that the dissociation of ES. This means that k2 tj. 

The electron transfer from cytochrome c to O2 catalyzed by cytochrome c oxidase was studied with initial steady state kinetics, following the absorbance decrease at 550 nm due to the oxidation of ferrocyto-chrome c in the presence of catalytic amounts of cytochrome c oxidase (Minnart, 1961 Errede ci a/., 1976 Ferguson-Miller ei a/., 1976). Oxidation of cytochrome c oxidase is a first-order reaction with respect to ferrocytochrome c concentration. Thus initial velocity can be determined quite accurately from the first-order rate constant multiplied by the initial concentration of ferrocytochrome c. The initial velocity depends on the substrate (ferrocytochrome c) concentration following the Michaelis-Menten equation (Minnart, 1961). Furthermore, a second catalytic site was found by careful examination of the enzyme reaction at low substrate concentration (Ferguson-Miller et al., 1976). The Km value was about two orders of magnitude smaller than that of the enzyme reaction previously found. The multiphasic enzyme kinetic behavior could be interpreted by a single catalytic site model (Speck et al., 1984). However, this model also requires two cytochrome c sites, catalytic and noncatalytic. 

Fig. 7.1 Chemical reaction mechanism representing a biochemical NAND gate. At steady state, the concentration of species 85 is low if and only if the concentrations of both species Ii and I2 are high. All species with asterisks are held constant by buffering. Thus, the system is formally open although there are two conservation constraints. The first constraint conserves the total concentration of S3 -F 84 -F 85, and the second conserves -F 87. All enzyme-catalyzed reactions in this model are governed by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Lines ending in over an enzymatic reaction step indicate that the corresponding enzyme is inhibited (noncom-petitively) by the relevant chemical species. We have set the dissociation constants, Kp j, of each of the enzymes Ei-Eg, from their respective substrates equal to 5 concentration units. The inhibition constants, K i and K 2, for the noncompetitive inhibition of E1 and 7 by 11 and I2, respectively, are both equal to 1 unit. The Vmax for both Ej and E2 is set to 5 units, and that for E3 and E4 is 1 unit/s. The Vmax s for E5 and Eg are 10 and 1 units/s, respectively. (From [1].)...

Yang and Schulz also formulated a treatment of coupled enzyme reaction kinetics that does not assume an irreversible first reaction. The validity of their theory is confirmed by a model system consisting of enoyl-CoA hydratase (EC 4.2.1.17) and 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.35) with 2,4-decadienoyl coenzyme A as a substrate. Unlike the conventional theory, their approach was found to be indispensible for coupled enzyme systems characterized by a first reaction with a small equilibrium constant and/or wherein the coupling enzyme concentration is higher than that of the intermediate. Equations based on their theory can allow one to calculate steady-state velocities of coupled enzyme reactions and to predict the time course of coupled enzyme reactions during the pre-steady state. 

STEADY STATE TREATMENT. While the Michaelis-Menten model requires the rapid equilibrium formation of ES complex prior to catalysis, there are many enzymes which do not exhibit such rate behavior. Accordingly, Briggs and Haldane considered the case where the enzyme and substrate obey the steady state assumption, which states that during the course of a reaction there will be a period over which the concentrations of various enzyme species will appear to be time-invariant ie., d[EX]/dr s 0). Such an assumption then provides that... 

A typical chemical system is the oxidative decarboxylation of malonic acid catalyzed by cerium ions and bromine, the so-called Zhabotinsky reaction this reaction in a given domain leads to the evolution of sustained oscillations and chemical waves. Furthermore, these states have been observed in a number of enzyme systems. The simplest case is the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme peroxidase. The reaction kinetics display either steady states, bistability, or oscillations. A more complex system is the ubiquitous process of glycolysis catalyzed by a sequence of coordinated enzyme reactions. In a given domain the process readily exhibits continuous oscillations of chemical concentrations and fluxes, which can be recorded by spectroscopic and electrometric techniques. The source of the periodicity is the enzyme phosphofructokinase, which catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate by ATP, resulting in the formation of fructose-1,6 biphosphate and ADP. The overall activity of the octameric enzyme is described by an allosteric model with fructose-6-phosphate, ATP, and AMP as controlling ligands. 

Some early kinetic studies on the enzymic reaction indicated that LADH exhibits pre-steady state half-of-the-sites reactivity. Bernard et al. reported that two distinct kinetic processes, well separated in rate, were observed for the conversion of reactants into products under conditions of excess enzyme.1367 They also reported that each of the two phases corresponded to conversion of exactly one half of the limiting concentration of substrate being converted to products. On the basis of this they proposed two possible models, the favoured one based on catalytically non-equivalent but interconvertible states of the two binding sites, with the possibility that the asymmetry of the sites may be induced by coenzyme binding. Further evidence for this non-equivalence of the subunits was obtained in similar subsequent studies using a chromophoric nitroso substrate, p-nitroso-A,JV-dimethylaniline with limiting NADH concentrations.1368... 

The explanation given above implies that stimulation of enzymatic activity by increase of salt concentration is pH dependent and that it will be less pronounced at lower pH values. The dependence of the steady-state reaction rate on salt concentration and pH as shown in Fig. 3 (Zusman, 1990) exactly reflects this prediction. It seems, therefore, at least as a preliminary explanation, that salt concentration affects the p/Ca of Asp-29, which, unlike its counterparts in eDHFR and ZDHFR, has a much lower p a. The question, then, is why the p/Ca of Asp-29 is so different. To answer this question and the validity of the entire model will require elucidation of the detailed kinetic scheme of ADHFR at different salt concentrations, determination of the three-dimensional structure of this enzyme, and modification of the amino acid residues constituting the active site. 

Briggs and Haldane [8] proposed a general mathematical description of enzymatic kinetic reaction. Their model is based on the assumption that after a short initial startup period, the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex is in a pseudo-steady state (PSS). For a constant volume batch reactor operated at constant temperature T, and pH, the rate expressions and material balances on S, E, ES, and P are... 

Vectors, such as x, are denoted by bold lower case font. Matrices, such as N, are denoted by bold upper case fonts. The vector x contains the concentration of all the variable species it represents the state vector of the network. Time is denoted by t. All the parameters are compounded in vector p it consists of kinetic parameters and the concentrations of constant molecular species which are considered buffered by processes in the environment. The matrix N is the stoichiometric matrix, which contains the stoichiometric coefficients of all the molecular species for the reactions that are produced and consumed. The rate vector v contains all the rate equations of the processes in the network. The kinetic model is considered to be in steady state if all mass balances equal zero. A process is in thermodynamic equilibrium if its rate equals zero. Therefore if all rates in the network equal zero then the entire network is in thermodynamic equilibrium. Then the state is no longer dependent on kinetic parameters but solely on equilibrium constants. Equilibrium constants are thermodynamic quantities determined by the standard Gibbs free energies of the reactants in the network and do not depend on the kinetic parameters of the catalysts, enzymes, in the network [49]. 

Ultrafiltration of an enzyme solution through a UF membrane does not always result in gel layer formation. Unless a gel layer is formed, this immobilization technique cannot be used for flow systems lacking effective enzyme immobilization. In any event, soluble enzyme membrane reactors can be useful in order to perform kinetic analysis at high enzyme concentrations. Once steady state is attained, the theoretical model permits calculation of reaction rates in both regions. Once the layer is formed it behaves like a secondary membrane,34 capable of separating compounds of different molecular weight in the mixture as well as catalyzing a chemical reaction. 

The derivation mathematics are detailed in many publications dealing with enzyme kinetics. The Michaelis-Menten constant is, however, due to the individual approximation used, not always the same. The simplest values result from the implementation of the equilibrium approximation in which represents the inverse equilibrium constant (eqn (4.2(a))). A more common method is the steady-state approach for which Briggs and Haldane assumed that a steady state would be reached in which the concentration of the intermediate was constant (eqn (4.2(b))). The last important approach, which should be mentioned, is the assumption of an irreversible formation of the substrate complex [k--y = 0) (eqn (4.2(c))), which is of course very unlikely. In real enzyme reactions and even in modelled oxo-transfer reactions, this seems not to be the case. 

This is a system of stiff, second-order partial differential equations which can be solved numerically to yield both transient, and steady state concentration profiles within the layer. Comparison of the experimental calibration curves and of the time response curves with the calculated ones provides the verification of the proposed model from which it is possible to determine the optimum thickness of the enzyme layer. Because the Thiele modulus is the controlling parameter in the diffusion-reaction equation it is obvious from Eq.6 that the optimum thickness L will depend on the other constants and functions included in the Thiele modulus. Because of this the optimum thickness will vary from one kinetic scheme to another. 

The Michaelis-Menten mechanism of enzyme activity models the enzyme with one active site that, weakly and reversibly, binds a substrate in homogeneous solution. It is a three-step mechanism. The first and second steps are the reversible formation of the enzyme-substrate complex (ES). The third step is the decay of the complex into the product. The steady-state approximation is applied to the concentration of the intermediate (ES) and its use simplifies the derivation of the final rate expression. However, the justification for the use of the approximation with this mechanism is suspect, in that both rate constants for the reversible steps may not be as large, in comparison to the rate constant for the decay to products, as they need to be for the approximation to be valid. The simplest form of the mechanism applies only when A h 2> k. Neverthele.ss, the form of the rate equation obtained does seem to match the principal experimental features of enzyme-catalyzed reactions it explains why there is a maximum in the reaction rate and provides a mechanistic understanding of the turnover number. The model may be expanded to include multisubstrate reaction rate and provides a mechanistic understanding of the turnover number. The model may be expanded to include multisubstrate reactions and inhibition. 

Introduce an intermediate substrate-enzyme complex [SE] into the first step of the reaction chain of Section 2.7 similarly as in the model of Section 2.2. Prove that now for increasing values of the substrate concentration S the steady state flux 1 saturates. Calculate the saturation value of 7. 

In this model we assume that rapid equilibrium binding of either substrate A or B to the enzyme takes place. For the second stage of the reaction, equilibrium binding of A to EB and B to EA, or a steady state in the concentration of the EAB ternary complex, may be assumed. 

---