Enforcement improvement notice

Enforcement powers. Compliance with OELs is a legal requirement under the COSHH Regulations. Under the HSW Act 1974 HSE inspectors have powers to issue two types of enforcement notice - an improvement notice or a prohibition notice - as well as powers to prosecute for criminal offences in the courts. Improvement notices are nomally used to instruct duty holders to remedy a situation in which an inspector believes that there has been a breach of the law resulting in a risk to the health or safety of persons that the law is intended to protect. The duty-holder is normally requir to remedy tiie situation within a specified time period in accordance wath the requirements laid out in the notice. Prohibition notices are normally issued where inspectors fell there is m imminent and serious risk to health and safety. They have the effect of prohibiting... 

The role of OELs in enforcement actions. Comphance with OELs is a legal requirement under the COSHH Regulations. Under the HSW Act 1974 HSE inspectors have powers to institute a range of formal enforcement actions. These include two types of enforcement notice - an improvement notice or a prohibition notice - as well as powers to institute prosecution for criminal offences in the... 

Although in comparison with improvement notices the number of prohibition notices issued under COSHH was relatively small, they increased in overall number during the 1990s and also therefore in proportion to improvement notices. The explanation for this is most likely to be the planned inspection activities of the FOD in particular industry sectors. Here, clear guidance would have been provided to inspectors on control standards and level of enforcement required, thus increasing their confidence to take this more serious enforcement action in circumstances in which it was felt to be warranted. 

Under an improvement notice , the HSE can demand that safety precautions be improved in the workplace. See Chapter 1, Enforcement of Health and Safety Regulations. 

Inspectorates in most Australian jurisdictions are making good use of these options. Take the NSW inspectorate, for example. In 1992-93 it carried out 75 000 workplace inspections, most of which would have involved advice to employers. In the course of these inspections 10 517 notices were issued. Of these, 71 per cent were improvement notices, 22 per cent prohibition notices and 7 per cent, or 825, on-the-spot fines. In the same period there were 310 prosecutions before the courts, the maximum fine before the Industrial Court being 60 000 (Workcover Aimual Report 1993, pp. 15-16). A fine of 100 000 was imposed early in 1994. It is clear that the existence of an enforcement pyramid has given the inspectorate rather more clout than it previously had. 

In the Crown Court there is no maximum fine. Up to two years imprisonment may be imposed for breach of a prohibition or improvement notice or remedy order or contravening a licence requirement. HSC Enforcement Policy includes a statement that wherever appropriate enforcing authorities should seek disqualification of directors under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Disqualification is possible on conviction for an indictable offence in connection with the management of a company . In a health and safety context disqualification could follow conviction xmder s. 37 HSW because a company s offence was committed with a director s/manager s consent, connivance or attributable to his neglect (or xmder s. 36 if it is a manager whose default caused the offence of another). 

Fire safety enforcement notice - this is very similar to the health and safety improvement notice and is served when, in the opinion of the enforcer, the responsible person or other person has failed to comply with any aspect of the RRO. 

It is not only the law in terms of the acts and regulations that shape an organisation s culture, but also enforcement action taken by the Health and Safety Executive and other enforcement bodies. For example, if the Health and Safety Executive were to issue an improvement notice on, for instance, a local outlet of a national retail organisation, the impact of that local improvement notice will be felt across the entire organisation. 

In certain circumstances it may be necessary to invoke enforcement action by serving a notice on the employer or occupier. There are two types of notice—Improvement Notices and Prohibition Notices. An Improvement Notice can be used only where there has been a breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act. The breach has to be remedied within a set period, and at least 3 weeks has to be allowed in order to give time for an appeal, which has to be lodged within that period. There is automatic prosecution at the... 

The financial consequences of receiving prohibition and improvement notices are often severe, because of work delays and disruption. There are rights for businesses to make representations under the Health and Safety Commission s Enforcement Policy. Details of rights of appeal to tribunals are given in writing with notices as they are issued. 

The ultimate penalty to the individual is personal injury and the consequences of accidents to a business in terms of disruption and loss of reputation extend far beyond the ability of a court to impose financial and other penalties on those who break the law. The use of Prohibition and Improvement Notices also contributes practical penalties in terms of delays to the work and involvement of senior management. Mostly, though, penalties are seen as the outcome of court proceedings brought by the enforcement authorities against employers and employees. 

There are two types of enforcement notices an improvement notice and a prohibition notice . 

The HSWA established the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Whilst the HSC defines policy, the HSE is responsible for the day to day monitoring and enforcing of the HSWA. The HSE has delegated powers to serve Improvement Notices (requires remedial action) and Prohibition Notices (stops a process). Failure to comply can lead to prosecution. The HSWA affects product safety as well as workplace safety and is based on the as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP ) principle, where practicable refers to what is possible to do, and reasonable requires a balance of costs, time, and trouble against the risk. 

The asymptotic behavior of the exchange-correlation potential far from the molecule has been identified as the key factor determining the accuracy of the ionization potentials of anions and electron affinities of neutral molecules.5 Recently, Wu et al.91 proposed a variational method, which enforces the correct long-range behavior of vxc. Indeed, a noticeable improvement compared to the Kohn-Sham results derived using conventional approximations (LDA-, GGA-, and hybrid functionals) was reported for atoms (H, He, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, and F) and diatomics (BeH, CH, NH, OH, CN, BO, NO, OO, FO, and FF). The still significant discrepancies between the experimental and calculated ionization potentials (or electron affinities) were attributed to errors of the exchange-correlation potential in the molecular interior. 

If an employer fails to follow the advice given, the inspectors have the right to take all the necessary measures they consider justifiable under the circumstances and, if necessary, they can issue improvement or enforcement notices. 

The MCA and HSE have similar powers of enforcement including, in panicular, powers to issue improvement and prohibition notices where HSE inspectors or MCA surveyors observe matters of evident concern in areas for which they arc not the lead authority. These should be reported without delay to the appropriate office of the other authority by telephone ... 

This hears cases arising from breaches of employment law where an employee complains against a decision of the employer in situations covered by the legislation. It also hears appeals against Improvement and Prohibition Notices issued by an enforcing officer. The tribunal is a civil court because the matters it considers relate to a difference of opinion between the employer and the employee, or the employer and the individual enforcing officer, over the interpretation of the law and not to a breach of the law. 

The economic argument is also relevant here, because of the fines that may be imposed as a result of statutory breaches, and also because of the impact of Improvement and Prohibition Notices in terms of uninsurable consequential loss arising out of enforced cessation of work. 

The 87 Act further extended the power of the Fire Authorities to enable them to enforce statutory obligations by the issue of Improvement and Prohibition Notices and by prosecution. The procedures regarding notices... 

Improvement and prohibition notices are additional new enforcement procedures which can produce results without resorting to the courts. 

---