Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy probability density

The depth of understanding of V-V, V-T, and V-R, relaxation in atom-diatom collisions at low densities is profound. " The advent of state-to- state experiments and of quantum, semiclassical, and classical calculations has provided a wealth of information. Stochastic approaches, which are still under development for polyatomic sys-tems should mimic the essential features of thermally averaged atom-diatom energy transfer when applied to these simple systems. The friction is essentially the characteristic of kinetic energy relaxation. The energy diffusion equation of the energy probability density tr(E, t) is... [Pg.420]

The formation of CF from CF4 is endoergic by 15 eV or more depending upon the assumed mechanism. For the F-for-F sequence shown in Reactions 77-84 the observation of CCU F product from Equation 83 thus implies that the excitation energy probability density distribution from Reaction 78 extends to at least 15 eV (47,48). Very substantial (P/Z) would be required to achieve complete collisional stabilization of these superexcited CF3 F molecules. [Pg.101]

The collision fraction law fails in competitive q>eriments in which the reactive collision energy probability density distribution is strongly dependent on sample composition. Such behavior arises when the excitation functions for nonthermal reactions exhibit dissimilar collision energy dependences (7,9,10,19-26). Despite diis caveat, the simple collision fraction rule exhibits good utility for many types of competitive systems (9,23). [Pg.211]

The Epithermal Nonequilibrium Model. The MNR thermalization tests may be conceptualized in terms of an epithermal steady-state hot atom collision energy probability density distribution 4,20,21 22,41 43,63,64,65). In epithermal terminology, high-pressure unimolecular rate constants for Reaction 13 can reveal temperature changes for the reacting C1 atoms. Based on the reported energy dependence for this system (40), experiments with 20% sensitivity could detect temperature variations of about 100 35 K. [Pg.221]

On the electrolyte side. Figure 1.12 shows the probability density distributions W for finding a single R or O species in the electrolyte with energy e of its donor or acceptor state. The maxima of these distributions are shifted by 2X, where X is the solvent reorganization energy. Probability density distributions of finite width arise because of thermal fluctuations of the solvation state of R and O in solution. They... [Pg.30]

The most serious setback for a modern theory of matter was the deliberate suppression of Erwin Schrodinger s demonstration that the behavior of electrons in an atom cannot be described correctly by a particle model and quantum jumps [5,6]. A beautiful theory, based on a wave model of matter, was buried through professional rivalry to be replaced by incomprehensible concepts such as particles with wavelike properties—even Zitterbewegung, infinite self-energy, probability density, non-Boolean algebra of observables and other weird properties. Remember how Newton described particles as... [Pg.163]

To extract infomiation from the wavefimction about properties other than the probability density, additional postulates are needed. All of these rely upon the mathematical concepts of operators, eigenvalues and eigenfiinctions. An extensive discussion of these important elements of the fomialism of quantum mechanics is precluded by space limitations. For fiirther details, the reader is referred to the reading list supplied at the end of this chapter. In quantum mechanics, the classical notions of position, momentum, energy etc are replaced by mathematical operators that act upon the wavefunction to provide infomiation about the system. The third postulate relates to certain properties of these operators ... [Pg.7]

The canonical distribution corresponds to the probability density for the system to be in a specific microstate with energy E- H, from it one can also obtain the probability P( ) that the system has an energy between E and E + AE i the density of states D E) is known. This is because, classically. [Pg.398]

Figure A3.13.il. Illustration of the time evolution of redueed two-dimensional probability densities I I and I I for the exeitation of CHD between 50 and 70 fs (see [154] for further details). The full eurve is a eut of tire potential energy surfaee at the momentary absorbed energy eorresponding to 3000 em during the entire time interval shown here (as6000 em, if zero point energy is ineluded). The dashed eurves show the energy uneertainty of the time-dependent wave paeket, approximately 500 em Left-hand side exeitation along the v-axis (see figure A3.13.5). The vertieal axis in the two-dimensional eontour line representations is... Figure A3.13.il. Illustration of the time evolution of redueed two-dimensional probability densities I I and I I for the exeitation of CHD between 50 and 70 fs (see [154] for further details). The full eurve is a eut of tire potential energy surfaee at the momentary absorbed energy eorresponding to 3000 em during the entire time interval shown here (as6000 em, if zero point energy is ineluded). The dashed eurves show the energy uneertainty of the time-dependent wave paeket, approximately 500 em Left-hand side exeitation along the v-axis (see figure A3.13.5). The vertieal axis in the two-dimensional eontour line representations is...
Figure B3.3.5. Energy distributions. The probability density is proportional to the product of the density of states and the Boltzmaim factor. Figure B3.3.5. Energy distributions. The probability density is proportional to the product of the density of states and the Boltzmaim factor.
A way of looking at the points raised in the previous section is to compare energy distributions in two systems whose free energies we wish to relate. In particular, consider measuring, in a simulation of system 0, the fiinction Pq(AE), i.e., the probability density per unit AE of configurations for which and differ by the... [Pg.2263]

Similar to the case without consideration of the GP effect, the nuclear probability densities of Ai and A2 symmetries have threefold symmetry, while each component of E symmetry has twofold symmetry with respect to the line defined by (3 = 0. However, the nuclear probability density for the lowest E state has a higher symmetry, being cylindrical with an empty core. This is easyly understand since there is no potential barrier for pseudorotation in the upper sheet. Thus, the nuclear wave function can move freely all the way around the conical intersection. Note that the nuclear probability density vanishes at the conical intersection in the single-surface calculations as first noted by Mead [76] and generally proved by Varandas and Xu [77]. The nuclear probability density of the lowest state of Aj (A2) locates at regions where the lower sheet of the potential energy surface has A2 (Ai) symmetry in 5s. Note also that the Ai levels are raised up, and the A2 levels lowered down, while the order of the E levels has been altered by consideration of the GP effect. Such behavior is similar to that encountered for the trough states [11]. [Pg.598]

A functional is a function of a function. Electron probability density p is a function p(r) of a point in space located by radius vector r measured from an origin (possibly an atomic mi dens), and the energy E of an electron distribution is a function of its probability density. E /(p). Therefore E is a functional of r denoted E [pfr). ... [Pg.327]

Knowing that sin(0) vanishes at0=n7i, for n=l,2,3,..., (although the sin(nTi) function vanishes for n=0, this function vanishes for all x or y, and is therefore unacceptable because it represents zero probability density at all points in space) one concludes that the energies Ex and Ey can assume only values that obey ... [Pg.16]

The probability density for a particle at a location is proportional to the square of the wavefunction at that point the wavefunction is found by solving the Schrodinger equation for the particle. When the equation is solved subject to the appropriate boundary conditions, it is found that the particle can possess only certain discrete energies. [Pg.145]

FIGURE 1.27 The two lowest energy wavefunctions (i <, orangei for a particle in a box and the corresponding probability densities (i] 2, blue). The probability densities are also shown by the density of shading of the bands beneath each wavefunction. [Pg.145]

Figure 12. Potential energy contour plots for He + I Cl(B,v = 3) and the corresponding probability densities for the n = 0, 2, and 4 intermolecular vibrational levels, (a), (c), and (e) plotted as a function of intermolecular angle, 0 and distance, R. Modified with permission from Ref. 40. The I Cl(B,v = 2/) rotational product state distributions measured following excitation to n = 0, 2, and 4 within the He + I Cl(B,v = 3) potential are plotted as black squares in (b), (d), and (f), respectively. The populations are normalized so that their sum is unity. The l Cl(B,v = 2/) rotational product state distributions calculated by Gray and Wozny [101] for the vibrational predissociation of He I Cl(B,v = 3,n = 0,/ = 0) complexes are shown as open circles in panel (b). Modified with permission from Ref. [51]. Figure 12. Potential energy contour plots for He + I Cl(B,v = 3) and the corresponding probability densities for the n = 0, 2, and 4 intermolecular vibrational levels, (a), (c), and (e) plotted as a function of intermolecular angle, 0 and distance, R. Modified with permission from Ref. 40. The I Cl(B,v = 2/) rotational product state distributions measured following excitation to n = 0, 2, and 4 within the He + I Cl(B,v = 3) potential are plotted as black squares in (b), (d), and (f), respectively. The populations are normalized so that their sum is unity. The l Cl(B,v = 2/) rotational product state distributions calculated by Gray and Wozny [101] for the vibrational predissociation of He I Cl(B,v = 3,n = 0,/ = 0) complexes are shown as open circles in panel (b). Modified with permission from Ref. [51].

See other pages where Energy probability density is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.1058]    [Pg.1062]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.1071]    [Pg.2144]    [Pg.2157]    [Pg.2220]    [Pg.2246]    [Pg.2271]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.963]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.387]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.420 ]




SEARCH



Energy densiti

Energy density

Energy eigenfunctions probability density

Energy spectrum probability density

Energy spectrum probability density distribution

Energy transfer probability density

Probability density

Probability, energy

© 2024 chempedia.info