Enantiotopic

In this example addition to the double bond of an alkene converted an achiral mol ecule to a chiral one The general term for a structural feature the alteration of which introduces a chirality center m a molecule is prochiral A chirality center is introduced when the double bond of propene reacts with a peroxy acid The double bond is a prochi ral structural unit and we speak of the top and bottom faces of the double bond as prochiral faces Because attack at one prochiral face gives the enantiomer of the com pound formed by attack at the other face we classify the relationship between the two faces as enantiotopic... 

Whatever happens at one enantiotopic face of the double bond of as or trans 2 butene hap pens at the same rate at the other resultrng mail mrxture of R) and (S) 2 bromobutane... 

Replacing one of them by some different atom or group gives the enantiomer of the structure obtained by replacing the other therefore the methylene hydrogens at C 2 of butane are enantiotopic The same is true for the hydrogens at C 3... 

The double bond m 2 methyl(methylene)cyclohexane is prochiral The two faces however are not enantiotopic as they were for the alkenes we discussed m Section 7 9 In those earlier examples when addition to the double bond created a new chirality cen ter attack at one face gave one enantiomer attack at the other gave the other enantiomer In the case of 2 methyl(methylene)cyclohexane which already has one chirality center attack at opposite faces of the double bond gives two products that are diastereomers of each other Prochiral faces of this type are called diastereotopic... 

When enantiomers are generated by replacing first one proton and then another by a test group the pair of protons are enantwtopic (Section 7 9) The methylene protons at C 2 of 1 propanol for example are enantiotopic... 

Enantiotopic protons can have different chemical shifts in a chiral solvent Because the customary solvent (CDCI3) used in NMR measurements is achiral this phenomenon is not observed in routine work... 

Hydrolytic enzymes such as esterases and Upases have proven particularly useful for asymmetric synthesis because of their abiUties to discriminate between enantiotopic ester and hydroxyl groups. A large number of esterases and Upases are commercially available in large quantities many are inexpensive and accept a broad range of substrates. 

In contrast to the hydrolysis of prochiral esters performed in aqueous solutions, the enzymatic acylation of prochiral diols is usually carried out in an inert organic solvent such as hexane, ether, toluene, or ethyl acetate. In order to increase the reaction rate and the degree of conversion, activated esters such as vinyl carboxylates are often used as acylating agents. The vinyl alcohol formed as a result of transesterification tautomerizes to acetaldehyde, making the reaction practically irreversible. The presence of a bulky substituent in the 2-position helps the enzyme to discriminate between enantiotopic faces as a result the enzymatic acylation of prochiral 2-benzoxy-l,3-propanediol (34) proceeds with excellent selectivity (ee > 96%) (49). In the case of the 2-methyl substituted diol (33) the selectivity is only moderate (50). 

The two protons at C-1 are topologically nonequivalent, since substitution of one produces a product tiiat is stereochemically distinct fiom that produced by substitution of the other. Ligands of this type are termed heterotopic, and, because the products of substitution are enantiomers, the more precise term enantiotopic also applies. If a chiral assembly is generated when a particular ligand is replaced by a new ligand, the original assembly is prochiral. Both C-1 and C-3 of 1,3-propanediol are prochiral centers. 

The enzyme-catalyzed interconversion of acetaldehyde and ethanol serves to illustrate a second important feature of prochiral relationships, that ofprochiral faces. Addition of a fourth ligand, different from the three already present, to the carbonyl carbon of acetaldehyde will produce a chiral molecule. The original molecule presents to the approaching reagent two faces which bear a mirror-image relationship to one another and are therefore enantiotopic. The two faces may be classified as re (from rectus) or si (from sinister), according to the sequence rule. If the substituents viewed from a particular face appear clockwise in order of decreasing priority, then that face is re if coimter-clockwise, then si. The re and si faces of acetaldehyde are shown below. 

Reaction of an achiral reagent with a molecule exhibiting enantiotopic faces will produce equal quantities of enantiomers, and a racemic mixture will result. The achiral reagent sodium borodeuteride, for example, will produce racemic l-deM/eno-ethanol. Chiral reagent can discriminate between the prochiral faces, and the reaction will be enantioselective. Enzymatic reduction of acetaldehyde- -[Pg.106]

As was the case for kinetic resolution of enantiomers, enzymes typically exhibit a high degree of selectivity toward enantiotopic reaction sites. Selective reactions of enaiitiotopic groups provide enantiomerically enriched products. Thus, the treatment of an achiral material containing two enantiotopic functional groups is a means of obtaining enantiomerically enriched material. Most successful examples reported to date have involved hydrolysis. Several examples are outlined in Scheme 2.11. 

Scheme 2.11. Enantioselective lyansfomiatlons Based on Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions Which Differentiate Enantiotopic Substituents...

Chiral chemical reagents can react with prochiral centers in achiral substances to give partially or completely enantiomerically pure product. An example of such processes is the preparation of enantiomerically enriched sulfoxides from achiral sulfides with the use of chiral oxidant. The reagent must preferential react with one of the two prochiral faces of the sulfide, that is, the enantiotopic electron pairs. 

An achiral reagent cannot distinguish between these two faces. In a complex with a chiral reagent, however, the two (phantom ligand) electron pairs are in different (enantiotopic) environments. The two complexes are therefore diastereomeric and are formed and react at different rates. Two reaction systems that have been used successfully for enantioselective formation of sulfoxides are illustrated below. In the first example, the Ti(0-i-Pr)4-f-BuOOH-diethyl tartrate reagent is chiral by virtue of the presence of the chiral tartrate ester in the reactive complex. With simple aryl methyl sulfides, up to 90% enantiomeric purity of the product is obtained. 

The concept of heterotopic atoms, groups, and faces can be extended from enantiotopic to diastereotopic types. If each of two nominally equivalent ligands in a molecule is replaced by a test group and the molecules that are generated are diaster-eomeric, then the ligands are diastereotopic. Similarly, if reaction at one face of a trigonal atom generates a molecule diastereomeric with that produced at the alternate face, the faces are diastereotopic. 

Replacing one of these protons by chlorine as a test group gives (/ )-2-chloro-l-propanol replacing the other gives (.S)-2-chloro-l-propanol. Enantiotopic protons have the sane chemical shift, regardless of the field strength of the NMR spectrometer. 

Enantiotopic (Section 7.9) Describing two atoms or groups in a molecule whose environments are nonsuperimposable mirror images of each other. The two protons shown in bold in CH3CH2CI, for example, are enantiotopic. Replacement of first one, then the other, by some arbitrary test group yields compounds that are enantiomers of each other. 

There are three main criteria for design of this catalytic system. First, the additive must accelerate the cyclopropanation at a rate which is significantly greater than the background. If the additive is to be used in substoichiometric quantities, then the ratio of catalyzed to uncatalyzed rates must be greater than 50 1 for practical levels of enantio-induction. Second, the additive must create well defined complexes which provide an effective asymmetric environment to distinguish the enantiotopic faces of the alkene. The ability to easily modulate the steric and electronic nature of the additive is an obvious prerequisite. Third, the additive must not bind the adduct or the product too strongly to interfere with turnover. 

---