Some different atoms

On page 26 you saw that sodium atoms have 11 protons. This is what makes them different from all other atoms. Only sodium atoms have 11 protons, and any atom with 11 protons must be a sodium atom. 

In the same way, an atom with 6 protons must be a carbon atom, and an atom with 7 protons must be a nitrogen atom  

You can tell what an atom is from the number of protons it has. 

The first twenty elements There are 105 elements altogether. Of these, hydrogen has the smallest atoms, with only 1 proton each. Helium atoms have 2 protons each, lithium atoms have 3 protons each, and so on up to hahnium atoms, which have 105 protons each. Below are the first twenty elements, arranged in order according to their number of protons  

Element Symbol Number of Number of Number of Number of 

---

Replacing one of them by some different atom or group gives the enantiomer of the structure obtained by replacing the other therefore the methylene hydrogens at C 2 of butane are enantiotopic The same is true for the hydrogens at C 3... 

An interesting observation regarding the effect of having some different atoms in a lattice is illustrated by the alloy Monel. Nickel is harder than copper, but when the alloy containing the two metals is made, it is harder than nickel. 

The abundance of a trace element is often too small to be accurately quantihed using conventional analytical methods such as ion chromatography or mass spectrometry. It is possible, however, to precisely determine very low concentrations of a constituent by measuring its radioactive decay properties. In order to understand how U-Th series radionuclides can provide such low-level tracer information, a brief review of the basic principles of radioactive decay and the application of these radionuclides as geochronological tools is useful. " The U-Th decay series together consist of 36 radionuclides that are isotopes (same atomic number, Z, different atomic mass, M) of 10 distinct elements (Figure 1). Some of these are very short-lived (tj j 1 -nd are thus not directly useful as marine tracers. It is the other radioisotopes with half-lives greater than 1 day that are most useful and are the focus of this chapter. 

In order to examine whether this sequence gave a fold similar to the template, the corresponding peptide was synthesized and its structure experimentally determined by NMR methods. The result is shown in Figure 17.15 and compared to the design target whose main chain conformation is identical to that of the Zif 268 template. The folds are remarkably similar even though there are some differences in the loop region between the two p strands. The core of the molecule, which comprises seven hydrophobic side chains, is well-ordered whereas the termini are disordered. The root mean square deviation of the main chain atoms are 2.0 A for residues 3 to 26 and 1.0 A for residues 8 to 26. 

The Mulliken and Ldwdin methods give different atomic charges, but mathematically there is nothing to indicate which of these partitionings gives the best result. There are some common problems with all population analyses based on partitioning the wave function in terms of basis functions. 

Position isomers differ in the positions of some reference atom, group or bond, e.g., CHjCHjCHjOH (n-propanol) and CH CHOHCHj (isopropanol) are isomers that differ in the location of the -OH group. 

A biradical is a molecule with two unpaired electrons. The unpaired electrons are usually on different atoms, as depicted in (20). In that biradical, one unpaired electron is on one carbon atom of the chain and the second is on another carbon atom several bonds away. In some cases, though, both electrons are on the same atom. One of the most important examples is the oxygen atom itself. Its electron configuration is He]2s22/ x.22py12pzl and its Lewis symbol is -O. The O atom has two unpaired electrons, and so it can be regarded as a special type of biradical. 

Many molecules contain atoms or groups that appear to be equivalent but at close inspection are actually different. We can test whether two atoms are equivalent by replacing each of them in turn with some other atom or group. If the new molecules created by this process are identical, the original atoms are equivalent otherwise not. We can distinguish three cases. 

Since ruthenium and rhodium are neighboring elements in the periodic table, a closer comparison of the properties of ruthenium-copper and rhodium-copper clusters is of interest (17). When we compare EXAFS results on rhodium-copper and ruthenium-copper catalysts in which the Cu/Rh and Cu/Ru atomic ratios are both equal to one, we find some differences which can be related to the differences in miscibility of copper with ruthenium and rhodium. The extent of concentration of copper at the surface appears to be lower for the rhodium-copper clusters than for the ruthenium-copper clusters, as evidenced by the fact that rhodium exhibits a greater tendency than ruthenium to be coordinated to copper atoms in such clusters. The rhodium-copper clusters presumably contain some of the copper atoms in the interior of the clusters. 

The second procedure is different from the previous one in several aspects. First, the metallic substrate employed is Au, which does not show a remarkable dissolution under the experimental conditions chosen, so that no faradaic processes are involved at either the substrate or the tip. Second, the tip is polarized negatively with respect to the surface. Third, the potential bias between the tip and the substrate must be extremely small (e.g., -2 mV) otherwise, no nanocavity formation is observed. Fourth, the potential of the substrate must be in a region where reconstruction of the Au(lll) surface occurs. Thus, when the bias potential is stepped from a significant positive value (typically, 200 mV) to a small negative value and kept there for a period of several seconds, individual pits of about 40 nm result, with a depth of two to four atomic layers. According to the authors, this nanostructuring procedure is initiated by an important electronic (but not mechanical) contact between tip and substrate. As a consequence of this interaction, and stimulated by an enhanced local reconstruction of the surface, some Au atoms are mobilized from the Au surface to the tip, where they are adhered. When the tip is pulled out of the surface, a pit with a mound beside it is left on the surface. The formation of the connecting neck between the tip and surface is similar to the TILMD technique described above but with a different hnal result a hole instead of a cluster on the surface (Chi et al., 2000). 

Our first attempt of a successive reduction method was utilized to PVP-protected Au/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles [125]. An alcohol reduction of Pd ions in the presence of Au nanoparticles did not provide the bimetallic nanoparticles but the mixtures of distinct Au and Pd monometallic nanoparticles, while an alcohol reduction of Au ions in the presence of Pd nanoparticles can provide AuPd bimetallic nanoparticles. Unexpectedly, these bimetallic nanoparticles did not have a core/shell structure, which was obtained from a simultaneous reduction of the corresponding two metal ions. This difference in the structure may be derived from the redox potentials of Pd and Au ions. When Au ions are added in the solution of enough small Pd nanoparticles, some Pd atoms on the particles reduce the Au ions to Au atoms. The oxidized Pd ions are then reduced again by an alcohol to deposit on the particles. This process may form with the particles a cluster-in-cluster structure, and does not produce Pd-core/ Au-shell bimetallic nanoparticles. On the other hand, the formation of PVP-protected Pd-core/Ni-shell bimetallic nanoparticles proceeded by a successive alcohol reduction [126]. 

---