Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mixing with other liquids, emulsions

Such reactions can take place predominantly in either the continuous or disperse phase or in both phases or mainly at the interface. Mutual solubilities, distribution coefficients, and the amount of interfadal surface are factors that determine the overall rate of conversion. Stirred tanks with power inputs of 5-10 HP/1000 gal or extraction-type equipment of various kinds are used to enhance mass transfer. Horizontal TFRs usually are impractical unless sufficiently stable emulsions can be formed, but mixing baffles at intervals are helpful if there are strong reasons for using such equipment. Multistage stirred chambers in a single shell are used for example in butene-isobutane alkylation with sulfuric acid catalyst. Other liquid-liquid processes listed in Table 17.1 are numbers 8, 27, 45, 78, and 90. [Pg.595]

Although mechanical parameters are important, this is not the only area of control. The selection of the correct mix of stabiliser components is also critical. Beverage emulsions are essentially different from food emulsions. Their application in a mobile, liquid phase at concentrations in the region of 0.1% results in the formation of a uniform dispersion of the component droplets, and in order to remain stable and to avoid the effects already mentioned, these droplets must remain discrete from each other and also not interact with other... [Pg.109]

Emulsions are formed when two immiscible liquids are mixed with each other. The most familiar types are oil-in-water emulsions (O/W emulsions), which consist of colloidal or microscopic oil droplets in water, and water-in-oil (W/O emulsion), where an aqueous solution is emulsified in an outer oil phase [24]. [Pg.69]

Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) uses two immiscible liquids as the two phases. The sample is dissolved in one of the liquids (refinate) which comes in contact with the other liquid (extractant) into a separatory funnel, under agitation, to increase the contact area among the phases. Some mixing time is usually necessary for efficient phase exchange. Multiple extractions are also mandatory if quantitative extraction is desired. Sample transfer can become a problem, especially if phase emulsions are produced. [Pg.1146]

One of the earliest uses of power ultrasound in processing was in emulsification. If a bubble collapses near the phase boundary of two immiscible liquids, the resultant shock wave can provide a very efficient mixing of the layers. Stable emulsions generated with ultrasound have been used in the textile, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Such emulsions are often more stable than those produced conventionally and often require little, if any, surfactant. Emulsions with smaller droplet sizes within a narrow size distribution are obtained when compared to other methods. [Pg.190]

After a series of chromatography steps yield a highly pure product in the liquid state, the product needs to undergo one or more steps to convert it to the form in which it will be sold. Drugs need to be formulated and mixed with binders, colors, and other excipients if they are sold in a solid form. They can also be sold as liquids or aerosols, suspensions or emulsions. In such a case, they need to be diluted and mixed at the correct concentration. [Pg.231]

Emulsion stability is determined by the strength of the interfacial film and the way the adsorbed molecules in it are packed. If the adsorbed molecules in the film are closely packed, and it has some strength and viscoelasticity, it is difficult for the emulsified liquid droplets to break the film. In other words, coalescence is difficult. The emulsion is therefore stable. The molecular structure and the properties of the emulsifiers in the film affect the film s properties. The molecules in the film are more closely packed if the emulsifier has straight chains rather than branched chains. The film strength is increased if mixed emulsifiers are used rather than a single one. The reasons are that (1) the molecules in the film are closely packed, (2) mixed liquid crystals are formed between droplets, and (3) molecular complexes are formed in the interface by emnlsifier compositions. For example, an oil-soluble surfactant mixed with a water-solnble snrfactant works very well to stabilize emulsions (Kang, 2001). [Pg.519]

PTC incorporated with other methods usually greatly enhances the reaction rate. Mass transfer of the catalyst or the complex between different phases is an important effect that influences the reaction rate. If the mass transfer resistance cannot be neglected, an improvement in the mass transfer rate will benefit the overall reaction rate. The application of ultrasound to these types of reactions can be very effective. Entezari and Keshavarzi [12] presented the utilization of ultrasound to cause efficient mixing of the liquid-liquid phases for the saponification of castor oil. They used cetyltrimethylammo-nium bromide (CTAB), benzyltriethylammonium chloride (BTEAC), and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) as the catalysts in aqueous alkaline solution. The more suitable PT catalyst CTAB can accumulate more at the liquid-liquid interface and produces an emulsion with smaller droplet size this phenomenon makes the system have a high interfacial surface area, but the degradation of CTAB is more severe than that of BTEAC or TBAB because of more accumulation at the interface of the cavity under ultrasound. [Pg.297]

To explain the hydrophilic role, the protocol of the dry adsortied emulsion preparation was modified as follows. Instead of preparing the primary emulsion, the hydrophilic silica (Tixosil 3S) and the aqueou.s phase (Table I) were mixed in a beaker at room temperature. The whole aqueous solution was absorbed by the hydrophilic silica and this wet powder was added to the oil phase at 60 0. After this lirst step, the hydrophobic silica was mixed to the creamy liquid, following the normal procedure. Table 3 (bottom) presents the kinetic parameters obtained with the dry adsorbed emulsion prepared with the alternative procedure (form I ). Figure 4 (curve 1 ) presents the release of sodium salicylate vs. lime for the medium particle size sample (800-1250 pm) at pH 1.2 compared with the results obtained with other dry adsorbed emulsions. The drug release was faster and the amounts of drug released very rapidly, and Lu were higher. [Pg.372]


See other pages where Mixing with other liquids, emulsions is mentioned: [Pg.435]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.1471]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.1294]    [Pg.1502]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.1772]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.1766]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.1475]    [Pg.1685]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.526]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



Liquids mixing

Mixed emulsions

© 2024 chempedia.info