Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Emission from trapped carriers

The po and Pi ratio in equation (2.3) determines which of two factors—namely, equilibrium or nonequilibrium (due to emission from traps) carriers—dominate in the relaxation process. That is, the depolarization current contains two maximum one is related to release of carriers from trap the origin of the other lies in the change of conductivity with temperature [14-18]. Although only one of the peaks mentioned contains information about trap parameters, it is possible to discriminate between simultaneously occurring processes, e.g., thermally stimulated depolarization and thermally stimulated dielectric relaxation. [Pg.24]

The sample, a reverse-biased p-n or metal-semiconductor junction, is placed in a capacitance bridge and the quiescent capacitance signal nulled out. The diode is then repetitively pulsed, either to lower reverse bias or into forward bias, and the transient due to the emission of trapped carriers is analyzed. As discussed in the preceding section, for a single deep state with JVT Nd the transient is exponential with an initial amplitude that gives the trap concentration, and a time constant, its emission rate. The capacitance signal is processed by a rate window whose output peaks when the time constant of the input transient matches a preset value. The temperature of the sample is then scanned (usually from 77 to 450°K) and the output of the rate window plotted as a function of the temperature. This produces a trap spectrum that peaks when the emission rate of carriers equals the value determined by the window and is zero otherwise. If there are several traps present, the transient will be a sum of exponentials, each having a time... [Pg.15]

A carrier thermally released from the trap into the transport band may be either retrapped by the same species of traps or a different one and, under the influence of an electric field, may contribute to an externally measurable current. It may either be swept out of the region being probed or recombined with a recombination center. Some of the electrons may even overcome the work function barrier and leave the solid. The traffic of these carriers from traps to the recombination centers or out of the material can be monitored at various stages, and thus, information on the thermal emission rates can be obtained indirectly. [Pg.6]

If the excitation occurred at a low temperature such that the thermal emission rate of carriers from traps is very small, the perturbed equilibrium will exist for a long time and only upon an appropriate increase of the sample temperature can the relaxation process proceed at a rate that permits one to monitor it by measuring the conductivity a(T) = exp(ncfin + Pl p) of the sample (TSC) or the luminescence (TSL) emitted by radiative recombination of carriers thermally released from the traps. [Pg.10]

Some relatively new analyses in the theory of nonradiative transitions have followed from the fact that there is no basic reason why our three primary processes cannot also take place in combination. Thus Gibb et al. (1977) propose a process of cascade capture into an excited electronic state and subsequent multiphonon emission from there. The results of this model were applied to capture and emission properties of the 0.75-eV trap in GaP. A more detailed analysis has since been given by Rees et al. (1980). Similarly, cascade capture followed by an Auger process with a free carrier seems a quite likely process. However, we are not aware that such a model has as yet been suggested. The third possible combination of processes, namely Auger with multiphonon, has been examined by Rebsch (1979) and by Chernysh... [Pg.31]

The electron- and hole-trapping dynamics in the case of WS2 are elucidated by electron-quenching studies, specifically by the comparison of polarized emission kinetics in the presence and absence of an adsorbed electron acceptor, 2,2 -bipyridine [68]. In the absence of an electron acceptor, WS exhibits emission decay kinetics similar to those observed in the M0S2 case. The polarized emission decays with 28-ps, 330-ps, and about 3-ns components. For carrier-quenching studies to resolve the dynamics of electron trapping, it is necessary that the electron acceptor quenches only conduction-band (not trapped) electrons. It is therefore first necessary to determine that electron transfer occurs only from the conduction band. The decay of the unpolarized emission (when both the electron and the hole are trapped) is unaffected by the presence of the 2,2 -bipyridine, indicating that electron transfer docs not take place from trap states in the WS2 case. Comparison of the polarized emission kinetics in the presence and absence of the electron acceptor indicates that electron transfer does occur from the conduction band. Specifically, this comparison reveals that the presence of 2,2 -bipyridine significantly shortens the slower decay component of the polarized... [Pg.198]

The triplet-triplet interaction, postulated to explain increased quantum yield of thin film organic LEDs, has been well known in EF of organic single crystals [2,21,41], One of the most spectacular manifestation of this type excitonic interactions is spatial distribution of EL emission (see Sec. 3.3). Interestingly, the EL light output resulting from the free-trapped carrier recombination (Oel) with respect to that underlain by free carriers recombination (Oel) does not depend on the trap depth [2]... [Pg.10]

Deep centres are often present in photoconductors and they can trap the photo-generated carriers. The statistical trapping (recombination or capture) and subsequent release (generation or emission) of these carriers leads to an extra source of noise called generation-recombination (g-r) noise. The presence of this noise depends on the purity of the material used as a photoconductor, but in some cases, it is inherent to the deliberate technological process as recombination centres can be added to reduce the time constant of the detector for specific applications. The time constant r of a single trap is related to its capture and emission time constants rc and re by r 1 = r 1 + t"1, and when the g-r noise arises from a trap with a definite value of r, the observed noise spectrum has a Lorentzian dependence on the modulation frequency /, peaking at /o = l/2nr. [Pg.109]

Therefore, the more pronounced green emission from PFO containing fluorenone defects results from a combination of efficient energy transfer, charge carrier trapping and relatively easy injection (from the electrodes) of carriers into the fluorenone traps. [Pg.176]

The photo-generated charge carriers trapped in shallow states turmel from one trap to another and recombine with opposite type of charge carrier. The emission from the recombination in shallow traps appears at a lower wavelength than deep traps. The broad emission band represents the superposition of wide distribution of traps distance (Spanhel and Anderson, 1991). [Pg.122]

It has been concluded from DC oonductioo measurements [76,88] that the aforementioned charge carriers are generated by emission from the electrodes and from trapped ionk iropuritks within the materials, and that they are conducted to the bulk of the material and their final residenoe by a bopping process along the polymerk chains. [Pg.249]

The net carrier concentration, shown in Fig. 7.8, was obtained at a frequency of 100 kHz. DLTS spectra were recorded using reverse- and forward-bias modes in the temperature range of 80-350 K. In the re verse-bias mode, the devices were reverse biased from -1.2V to -0.2V, with a pulse width of 1 ms. Two hole (majority-carrier) trap levels were found in all the devices. These levels were designated as Hi at I iv+0.26 and H2, for which an activation energy could not be resolved. Upon minority-carrier injection (forward-bias mode), DLTS showed two additional electron (minority-carrier) traps, which are labeled Ei (Ec-0.1eV) and E2 (Ec-0.83eV) in Table 7.1. The spectra were measured at an emission time of 465.2 s and the width of the... [Pg.216]


See other pages where Emission from trapped carriers is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.5577]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.5576]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.351]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 ]




SEARCH



Carrier traps

Emissions from

© 2024 chempedia.info