Electrostatic potential water

Z1, P Cieplak, W D Cornell and P A Kolhnan 1993. A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based 5thod for Deriving Atomic Charges - The RESP Model. Journal of Physical Chemistry 97 10269-10280. sen H C, J P M Postma, W F van Gunsteren and J Hermans 1981. Interaction Models for Water in lation to Protein Hydration. In Pullman B (Editor). Intermolecular Forces. Dordrecht, Reidel, I. 331-342. 

FIGURE 13.5 Isosurface plots, (a) Region of negative electrostatic potential around the water molecule. (A) Region where the Laplacian of the electron density is negative. Both of these plots have been proposed as descriptors of the lone-pair electrons. This example is typical in that the shapes of these regions are similar, but the Laplacian region tends to be closer to the nucleus. 

The orientational structure of water near a metal surface has obvious consequences for the electrostatic potential across an interface, since any orientational anisotropy creates an electric field that interacts with the metal electrons. Hydrogen bonds are formed mainly within the adsorbate layer but also between the adsorbate and the second layer. Fig. 3 already shows quite clearly that the requirements of hydrogen bond maximization and minimization of interfacial dipoles lead to preferentially planar orientations. On the metal surface, this behavior is modified because of the anisotropy of the water/metal interactions which favors adsorption with the oxygen end towards the metal phase. 

FIGURE 19.3 The free W energies of ionization of ethanol and acetic acid in water. The electrostatic potential maps of ethoxide and acetate ion show the concentration of negative charge in ethoxide versus dispersal of charge in acetate. The color ranges are equal in both models to allow direct comparison. 

Electrostatic potential map for hydronium+3 water molecules shows most positively-charged regions (in blue) and less positively-charged regions (in red). 

Examine electrostatic potential maps for free hydronium and for hydronium complexed to three and nine water molecules hydronium+3 water and hydronium+9 water, respectively). What happens to the positive charge as more and more water molecules are involved Rationalize your result. 

Display electrostatic potential maps for water, ethanol, formic acid and propanoic acid, and examine the value of the electrostatic potential at the most electron-poor site. What causes a larger change in electrostatic potential, switching the alkyl group for H, or changing the structure of the acidic functional group ... 

Experimental reactivity patterns are based on solution behavior which are influenced by interactions between solvent and reacting molecules (especially ions). Compare electrostatic potential maps of 2-methyl-2-propyl cation and dimethylhydroxy cation. Identify sites that might form strong hydrogen bonds with water. Which ion will be better stabilized by its interaction with water ... 

Compare and contrast the electrostatic potential map of a typical detergent with that of a typical soap (stearate). Which part of each molecule will be most water soluble (hydrophilic) Draw a Lewis structure that describes each molecule s water-soluble group (make sure you indicate all necessary formal charges and lone pairs). Which part(s) of each molecule will be most grease soluble (lipophilic) What kinds of atoms and bonds are found in these groups ... 

The previous calculation assumed that the solvation energy of ammonium was equal the solvation energy of a single water molecule times the number of water binding sites. Is this a valid assumption Compare the electrostatic potential maps of ammonium ion and ammonium ion+water. For which are the exposed hydrogens more acidic Did the calculation underestimate or overestimate the difference in solvation energies ... 

What properties oibenzyltriethylammonium ion make it soluble in diverse solvents Examine its electrostatic potential map and atomic charges. Which groups facilitate water solubility Explain. Which groups facilitate chloroform solubility Explain. 

As the corrosion rate, inclusive of local-cell corrosion, of a metal is related to electrode potential, usually by means of the Tafel equation and, of course, Faraday s second law of electrolysis, a necessary precursor to corrosion rate calculation is the assessment of electrode potential distribution on each metal in a system. In the absence of significant concentration variations in the electrolyte, a condition certainly satisfied in most practical sea-water systems, the exact prediction of electrode potential distribution at a given time involves the solution of the Laplace equation for the electrostatic potential (P) in the electrolyte at the position given by the three spatial coordinates (x, y, z). 

Figure 27.1 A soap micelle solubilizing a grease particle in water. An electrostatic potential map of a fatty acid carboxylate shows how the negative charge is located in the head group.

Walden, Paul, 360 Walden inversion. 359-360 Wang resin, solid-phase peptide synthesis and. 1037 Water, acid-base behavior of, 50 dipole moment of, 39 electrostatic potential map of. 53 nucleophilic addition reactions of, 705-706 pKaof, 51-52... 

By covalently attaching reactive groups to a polyelectrolyte main chain the uncertainty as to the location of the associated reactive groups can be eliminated. The location at which the reactive groups experience the macromolecular environment critically controls the reaction rate. If a reactive group is covalently bonded to a macromolecular surface, its reactivity would be markedly influenced by interfacial effects at the boundary between the polymer skeleton and the water phase. Those effects may vary with such factors as local electrostatic potential, local polarity, local hydrophobicity, and local viscosity. The values of these local parameters should be different from those in the bulk phase. 

Besides the electrostatic potential effect on reactivity, functionalized polyelectrolytes have a variety of interesting features worthy of study. If a polyelectrolyte is covalently modified with highly hydrophobic functional groups, it provides an unusual opportunity to study the chemical reactions of normally otherwise water insoluble functional groups in aqueous solution. Furthermore, a structural organization via hydrophobic interactions may occur in aqueous solution [25 — 31], which is of general scientific importance and is worth studying for its own sake. 

The reactivity modification or the reaction rate control of functional groups covalently bound to a polyelectrolyte is critically dependent on the strength of the electrostatic potential at the boundary between the polymer skeleton and the water phase ( molecular surface ). This dependence is due to the covalent bonding of the functional groups which fixes the reaction sites to the molecular surface of the polyelectrolyte. Thus, the surface potential of the polyion plays a decisive role in the quantitative interpretation of the reactivity modification on the molecular surface. 

Fig. 1.1 An electrostatic potential map of a water molecule [Scanned from Silberberg (2006, 4th edition)]...

As the particle moves relative to the electrolyte solution, the layer of water mol-ecnles that is directly adjacent to the particle surface is strongly bonnd and will be pnlled along. The thickness of this bonnd layer is approximately one or two diameters of a water molecule. We shall write x, for the x-coordinate of this layer s outer boundary, which is the slip plane. The electrostatic potential at this plane relative to the potential in the bulk solution is designated by the Greek letter and called the zeta potential or electrokinetic potential of the interface discussed. This potential is a very important parameter characterizing the electrokinetic processes in this system. 

Haeberlein, M., Brinck, T. Prediction of water-octanol partition coefficients using theoretical descriptors derived from the molecular surface area and the electrostatic potential. J. Chem. Soc. 

Brinck, T., J. S. Murray, and P. Politzer. 1993. Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients Expressed in Terms of Solute Molecular Surface Areas and Electrostatic Potentials. J. Org. Chem. 58, 7070. 

Fig. 2.2. Average electrostatic potential mc at the position of the methane-like Lennard-Jones particle Me as a function of its charge q. mc contains corrections for the finite system size. Results are shown from Monte Carlo simulations using Ewald summation with N = 256 (plus) and N = 128 (cross) as well as GRF calculations with N = 256 water molecules (square). Statistical errors are smaller than the size of the symbols. Also included are linear tits to the data with q < 0 and q > 0 (solid lines). The fit to the tanh-weighted model of two Gaussian distributions is shown with a dashed line. Reproduced with permission of the American Chemical Society...

Consider the case of an ion in water. The force field for the ion may be described using a Lennard-Jones and electrostatic potential with charge q. Assume that we... 

---